Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 2.1
5-Year Impact Factor – 2.2
Scopus CiteScore – 3.4 (CiteScore Tracker 3.4)
Index Copernicus  – 161.11; MEiN – 140 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2019, vol. 28, nr 9, September, p. 1229–1235

doi: 10.17219/acem/105379

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Effectiveness of subcutaneously administered methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Przemysław Kotyla1,C,D,F, Bogdan Batko2,E,F, Zbigniew Zuber3,E,F, Agnieszka Almgren-Rachtan4,B,C,F, Jerzy Chudek5,A,C,D,E,F, Eugeniusz Józef Kucharz1,C,F

1 Department of Internal Medicine, Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Medical Faculty in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland

2 Department of Rheumatology, J. Dietl Specialist Hospital, Kraków, Poland

3 Department of Older Children with Subunits of Neurology and Rheumatology, St. Louis Regional Specialized Children’s Hospital, Kraków, Poland

4 Department of Pharmacovigilance, Europharma M. Rachtan Co. Ltd., Katowice, Poland

5 Department of Pathophysiology and Department of Internal Medicine and Oncological Chemotherapy, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland


Background. Subcutaneous methotrexate (sMTX) administration is considered more effective than the oral route due to better bioavailability and a lower rate of adverse drug reactions (ADRs); however, clinical data supporting this hypothesis is scarce.
Objectives. The aim of the study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of sMTX in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA), including a subset classified as an early stage of RA.
Material and Methods. A post-marketing, multicenter, open-label, non-randomized, non-interventional study enrolled 771 adult patients with active RA treated with sMTX (Metex®) for 2–6 weeks. The evaluation of therapy effectiveness (DAS28-ESR or DAS28-CRP) and monitoring of ADRs was an element of routine patient management. Therapy effectiveness was scored as the achievement of remission or response (according to European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)).
Results. Among 761 (98.7%) patients that continued sMTX (after 25–31 weeks), clinical response was achieved by 69.5%, remission by 19.2% and low disease activity by 34.2%. Patients aged >60 years were less likely to achieve both remission (odds ratio (OR) = 0.61 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.39–0.93)) and clinical response (OR = 0.82 (95% CI = 0.71–0.95)), while overweight/obese patients (OR = 1.11 (95% CI = 1.00–1.24)) and those with early RA had greater chance to reach a clinical response (OR = 1.18 (95% CI = 1.03–1.34)). There were 16 ADRs (no serious or severe). In addition, at least 2-fold increase in alanine transaminase (ALT) activity was noted in 10 patients (1.3%).
Conclusion. After 6-month therapy with sMTX, about 70% of patients with RA achieve a clinical response, and remission was observed in 20%. Younger age, overweight/obesity and an early stage of the disease are factors increasing therapy effectiveness; sMTX is well tolerated.

Key words

methotrexate, rheumatoid arthritis, tolerance, subcutaneous, response rate

References (21)

  1. Alamanos Y, Voulgari PV, Drosos AA. Incidence and prevalence of rheumatoid arthritis, based on the 1987 American College of Rheumatology criteria: A systematic review. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006;36(3):182–188.
  2. Verschueren P, De CD, Corluy L, et al. Methotrexate in combination with other DMARDs is not superior to methotrexate alone for remission induction with moderate-to-high-dose glucocorticoid bridging in early rheumatoid arthritis after 16 weeks of treatment: The CareRA trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015;74(1):27–34.
  3. Smolen JS, Landewe R, Breedveld FC, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2013 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(3):492–509.
  4. Singh JA, Saag KG, Bridges SL Jr, et al. 2015 American College of Rheumatology Guideline for the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2016;68(1):1–26.
  5. Smolen JS, Breedveld FC, Burmester GR, et al. Treating rheumatoid arthritis to target: 2014 update of the recommendations of an international task force. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(1):3–15.
  6. Quinn MA, Emery P. Window of opportunity in early rheumatoid arthritis: Possibility of altering the disease process with early intervention. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2003;21(5:Suppl 31):Suppl-7.
  7. Aletaha D, Neogi T, Silman AJ, et al. 2010 Rheumatoid arthritis classification criteria: An American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism collaborative initiative. Arthritis Rheum. 2010;62(9):2569–2581.
  8. Sheehy C, Evans V, Hasthorpe H, Mukhtyar C. Revising DAS28 scores for remission in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(2):269–272.
  9. Bijlsma JW, Welsing PM, Woodworth TG, et al. Early rheumatoid arthritis treated with tocilizumab, methotrexate, or their combination (U-Act-Early): A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, strategy trial. Lancet. 2016;388(10042):343–355.
  10. Muller RB, von KJ, Haile SR, Schiff MH. Effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of subcutaneous methotrexate in early rheumatoid arthritis: A retrospective analysis of real-world data from the St. Gallen cohort. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2015;45(1):28–34.
  11. Moreland LW, O’Dell JR, Paulus HE, et al. A randomized comparative effectiveness study of oral triple therapy versus etanercept plus methotrexate in early aggressive rheumatoid arthritis: The treatment of Early Aggressive Rheumatoid Arthritis Trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2012;64(9):2824–2835.
  12. van Vollenhoven RF, Ernestam S, Geborek P, et al. Addition of infliximab compared with addition of sulfasalazine and hydroxychloroquine to methotrexate in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis (Swefot trial): 1-year results of a randomised trial. Lancet. 2009;374(9688):459–466.
  13. Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Rheumatoid arthritis therapy reappraisal: Strategies, opportunities and challenges. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015;11(5):276–289.
  14. Schiff MH, Jaffe JS, Freundlich B. Head-to-head, randomised, crossover study of oral versus subcutaneous methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: Drug-exposure limitations of oral methotrexate at doses >/=15 mg may be overcome with subcutaneous administration. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(8):1549–1551.
  15. Hazlewood GS, Thorne JC, Pope JE, et al. The comparative effectiveness of oral versus subcutaneous methotrexate for the treatment of early rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016;75(6):1003–1008.
  16. Braun J, Kastner P, Flaxenberg P, et al. Comparison of the clinical efficacy and safety of subcutaneous versus oral administration of methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: Results of a six-month, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled, phase IV trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58(1):73–81.
  17. Scott DG, Claydon P, Ellis C. Retrospective evaluation of continuation rates following a switch to subcutaneous methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis patients failing to respond to or tolerate oral methotrexate: The MENTOR study. Scand J Rheumatol. 2014;43(6):470–476.
  18. Borchers AT, Keen CL, Cheema GS, Gershwin ME. The use of methotrexate in rheumatoid arthritis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2004;34(1):465–483.
  19. Kromann CB, Lage-Hansen PR, Koefoed M, Jemec GB. Does switching from oral to subcutaneous administration of methotrexate influence on patient reported gastro-intestinal adverse effects? J Dermatolog Treat. 2015;26(2):188–190.
  20. Hameed B, Jones H. Subcutaneous methotrexate is well tolerated and superior to oral methotrexate in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Int J Rheum Dis. 2010;13(4):e83–e84.
  21. Stavropoulos-Kalinoglou A, Metsios GS, Panoulas VF, et al. Underweight and obese states both associate with worse disease activity and physical function in patients with established rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2009;28(4):439–444.