Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 2.1
5-Year Impact Factor – 2.2
Scopus CiteScore – 3.4 (CiteScore Tracker 3.4)
Index Copernicus  – 161.11; MEiN – 140 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2019, vol. 28, nr 9, September, p. 1153–1159

doi: 10.17219/acem/104530

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Perforator artery response to tissue expansion: An experimental study in rabbits

Omer Kokacya1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Cengiz Eser1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Erol Kesiktas1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Eyuphan Gencel1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Huseyin Tugsan Balli2,A,B,C,D,E,F, Arbil Acikalin3,A,B,C,D,E,F

1 Department of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey

2 Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey

3 Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Çukurova University, Adana, Turkey


Background. The reconstruction of defects is a major area of interest in plastic surgery. Tissues are expanded to extend the tissue surface area and to prepare more reliable perforator flaps.
Objectives. Because expanded perforator flaps have become more popular, the aim of this study is to determine the response of the perforator artery to tissue expansion.
Material and Methods. We used a rabbit S1 perforator (first perforator branch of the thoracodorsal arteries) flap model. In 12 New Zealand White rabbits, left flaps were used as the experimental group (n = 12) and right flaps were used as the control group (n = 12). Both flaps were constructed in the dorsal skin. The experimental group was further divided into 3 subgroups according to expansion volume: 150 mL (n = 4), 200 mL (n = 4) and 250 mL (n = 4). We evaluated the responses of the perforator arteries to tissue expansion using the resistivity index (RI), the pulsatility index (PI), vessel diameter (D), histopathological examinations, and angiography.
Results. After 3 weeks of expansion, the perforator artery diameter had increased (p = 0.002) and the RI had decreased (p = 0.031) in the experimental group. The perforator artery diameter (p = 0.006) and RI had increased (p = 0.003) in the control group. No significant changes were observed in the PI in either group (p > 0.05) and no significant differences in post-expansion measurements were observed between experimental subgroups (p > 0.05).
Conclusion. Suprafascial expansion of a perforator flap leads to an increase in diameter and a decrease in the RI of the perforator artery. The decrease in RI may indicate increased flap perfusion.

Key words

perforator artery, tissue expansion, experimental, rabbit, Doppler indices

References (18)

  1. Angel MF, Khazanchi RK, O’Brien BM. The anatomy of the subscapular artery and its effects on flap design in the rabbit. Ann Plast Surg. 1990;24(2):152–155.
  2. Guerra AB, Gill PS, Trahan CG, et al. Comparison of bacterial inoculation and transcutaneous oxygen tension in the rabbit S1 perforator and latissimus dorsi musculocutaneous flaps. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2005;21(2):137–143.
  3. Hallock GG. Doppler sonography and color duplex imaging for planning a perforator flap. Clin Plast Surg. 2003;30(3):347–357.
  4. Giunta R, Geisweid A, Feller A. The value of preoperative Doppler sonography for planning free perforator flaps. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(7):2381–2386.
  5. Blondeel PN, Beyens G, Verhaeghe R, et al. Doppler flowmetry in the planning of perforator flaps. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51(3):202–209.
  6. Arya R, Griffiths L, Figus A, King D, Ramakrishnan V, Griffiths M. Post-operative assessment of perfusion of Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator (DIEP) free flaps via Pulsatility Index (PI) using a portable colour Doppler sonogram device. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2013;66(7):931–936.
  7. Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt K, Hamdi M, Monstrey SJ. Perforator flap terminology: Update 2002. Clin Plast Surg. 2003;30(3):343–346.
  8. Blondeel PN, Van Landuyt KH, Monstrey SJ, et al. The “Gent” consensus on perforator flap terminology: Preliminary definitions. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112(5):1378–1383.
  9. Hocaoğlu E, Emeklı U, Çızmecı O, Uçar A. Suprafascial pre-expansion of perforator flaps and the effect of pre-expansion on perforator artery diameter. Microsurgery. 2014;34(3):188–196.
  10. Shang Z, Zhao Y, Ding H, Liu B, Cao D, Wang B. Repair of hand scars by a dilated deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2011;45(2):102–108.
  11. Ogino A, Onishi K. Vascular waveform analysis of flap-feeding vessels using color Doppler ultrasonography. Plast Surg Int. 2014;2014:249670.
  12. Radmehr A, Jandaghi AB, Hashemi TA, Shakiba M. Serial resistive index and pulsatility index for diagnosing renal complications in the early posttransplant phase: Improving diagnostic efficacy by considering maximum values. Exp Clin Transplant. 2008;6(2):161–167.
  13. Stark GB, Hong C, Futrell JW. Rapid elongation of arteries and veins in rats with a tissue expander. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80(4):570–578.
  14. Cherry GW, Austad E, Pasyk K, McClatchey K, Rohrich RJ. Increased survival and vascularity of random-pattern skin flaps elevated in controlled, expanded skin. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1983;72(5):680–687.
  15. Kim KH, Hong C, Futrell JW. Histomorphologic changes in expanded skeletal muscle in rats. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1993;92(4):710–716.
  16. Mutaf M, Tasaki Y, Fujii T. Expansion of venous flaps: An experimental study in rats. Br J Plast Surg. 1998;51(5):393–401.
  17. Taylor GI, Palmer J. The vascular territories (angiosomes) of the body: Experimental study and clinical applications. Br J Plast Surg. 1987;40(2):113–141.
  18. Taylor GI, Minabe T. The angiosomes of the mammals and other vertebrates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1992;89(2):181–215.