Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 2.1 (5-Year IF – 2.0)
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) (2023) – 0.4
Scopus CiteScore – 3.7 (CiteScore Tracker 3.8)
Index Copernicus  – 171.00; MNiSW – 70 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2018, vol. 27, nr 3, March, p. 335–341

doi: 10.17219/acem/65484

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Air-conducted and skull-tap cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in determining nerve division involvement in vestibular schwannoma patients

Magdalena Lachowska1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Paulina Glinka1,B,C, Kazimierz Niemczyk1,E,F

1 Department of Otolaryngology, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland

Abstract

Background. Air-conducted and skull-tap cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (AC-cVEMP and Tap-cVEMP) have been shown to be very promising tools in clinical practice. They are noninvasive, easy to obtain and – importantly – they require little time and the cost of the instruments is low.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of the combined use of ACand Tap-cVEMPs as a diagnostic tool for advanced assessment of vestibular schwannoma in determining tumor origin, and to investigate whether the results are helpful for a surgeon as an additional source of information about the tumor before surgery.
Material and Methods. ACand Tap-cVEMPs were acquired (with EMG-based biofeedback) from the sternocleidomastoid muscles (SCM) of 30 vestibular schwannoma patients just before surgery. The results were compared to the surgical information about nerve bundle involvement in the tumor and the size of the tumor obtained from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
Results. On the tumor side, abnormal corrected amplitude asymmetry ratios were detected in 73.33% of the patients, abnormalities in P1-latencies in 70% of the patients, and both in 90% of the patients. The cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potential (cVEMP) results indicated the affected nerve division to be the inferior in 23.33% of the patients, the superior in 20% of the patients, and both in 46.67% of the patients. No cVEMP abnormalities were found in 10% of cases. The combined results of both ACand Tap-cVEMP were significantly compatible with the surgical information about the tumor origin. The number of abnormalities was significantly correlated with the tumor size.
Conclusion. The information provided by the combined application of ACand Tap-cVEMPs might be useful for a surgeon in presurgical planning, providing more detailed information about the tumor and the affected nerve division in the internal auditory canal. It is not a diagnostic replacement for MRI in vestibular schwannoma patients; however, in our opinion, ACand Tap-cVEMPs may serve as additional sources of information about the tumor before the surgery.

Key words

vestibular schwannoma, cerebellopontine angle tumor, sternocleidomastoid muscle, vestibular nerve, unilateral hearing loss

References (24)

  1. Silverstein H. Cochlear and vestibular gross and histologic anatomy (as seen from postauricular approach). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1984;92(2):207–211.
  2. Schefter RP, Harner SG. Histologic study of the vestibulocochlear nerve. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1986;95(2 Pt 1):146–150.
  3. Rubinstein D, Sandberg EJ, Cajade-Law AG. Anatomy of the facial and vestibulocochlear nerves in the internal auditory canal. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1996;17(6):1099–1105.
  4. Sterkers O, Martin C, Arnold W. Vestibular schwannoma. In: Anniko M, Bernal-Sprekelsen M, Bonkowsky V, Bradley P, Iurato S, eds. Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery – European Manual of Medicine. Leipzig: Springer Verlag; 2010:92–97.
  5. Young ED, Fernandez C, Goldberg JM. Responses of squirrel monkey vestibular neurons to audio-frequency sound and head vibration. Acta Otolaryngol. 1977;84(5–6);352–360.
  6. Murofushi T, Curthoys IS. Physiological and anatomical study of click-sensitive primary vestibular afferents in the guinea pig. Acta Otolaryngol. 1997;117(1):66–72.
  7. Townsend GL, Cody DT. The averaged inion response evoked by acoustic stimulation: Its relation to the saccule. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1971;80(1):121–131.
  8. Murofushi T, Halmagyi GM, Yavor RA, Colebatch JG. Absent vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in vestibular neurolabyrinthitis. An indicator of inferior vestibular nerve involvement? Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(8):845–848.
  9. Murofushi T, Matsuzaki M, Mizuno M. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in patients with acoustic neuromas. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(5):509–512.
  10. Brantberg K, Tribukait A. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to laterally directed skull taps. J Vestib Res. 2002;12(1):35–45.
  11. Brantberg K, Tribukait A, Fransson PA. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to skull taps for patients with vestibular neuritis. J Vestib Res. 2003;13(2–3):121–130.
  12. Brantberg K, Mathiesen T. Preservation of tap vestibular evoked myogenic potentials despite resection of the inferior vestibular nerve. J Vestib Res. 2004;14(4):347–351.
  13. Yavuz E, Lachowska M, Pierchała K, Morawski K, Niemczyk K, Delgado RE. Clinical use of skull tap vestibular evoked myogenic potentials for the diagnoses of the cerebellopontine angle tumor patients. BioMed Res Int. 2014;2014:135457. doi:10.1155/2014/135457
  14. Colebatch JG. Properties of rectified averaging of an evoked-type signal: Theory and application to the vestibular-evoked myogenic potential. Exp Brain Res. 2009;199(2):167–176.
  15. McCaslin DL, Jacobson GP, Hatton K, Fowler AP, DeLong AP. The effects of amplitude normalization and EMG targets on cVEMP interaural amplitude asymmetry. Ear Hear. 2013;34(4):482–490.
  16. van Tilburg MJ, Herrmann BS, Guinan JJ Jr, Rauch SD. Normalization reduces intersubject variability in cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Otol Neurotol. 2014;35(8):222–227.
  17. Papathanasiou ES, Murofushi T, Akin FW, Colebatch JG. International guidelines for the clinical application of cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials: An expert consensus report. Clin Neurophysiol. 2014;125(4):658–666.
  18. Welgampola MS, Colebatch JG. Vestibulocollic reflexes: Normal values and the effect of age. Clin Neurophysiol. 2001;112(11):1971–1979.
  19. Tsutsumi T, Tsunoda A, Noguchi Y, Komatsuzaki A. Prediction of the nerves of origin of vestibular schwannomas with vestibular evoked myogenic potentials. Am J Otol. 2000;21(5):712–715.
  20. Brantberg K, Westin M, Löfqvist L, Verrecchia L, Tribukait A. Vestibular evoked myogenic potentials in response to lateral skull taps are dependent on two different mechanisms. Clin Neurophysiol. 2009; 120(5):974–979.
  21. Kushiro K, Zakir M, Ogawa Y, Sato H, Uchino Y. Saccular and utricular inputs to sternocleidomastoid motoneurons of decerebrate cats. Exp Brain Res. 1999;126(3):410–416.
  22. Todd NP, Rosengren SM, Colebatch JG. A source analysis of short-latency vestibular evoked potentials produced by air- and bone-conducted sound. Clin Neurophysiol. 2008;119(8):1881–1894.
  23. Lin KL, Chen CM, Wang SJ, Young YH. Correlating vestibular schwannoma size with vestibular-evoked myogenic potential results. Ear Hear. 2014;35(5):571–576.
  24. Taylor RL, Kong J, Flanagan S, et al. Prevalence of vestibular dysfunction in patients with vestibular schwannoma using video head-impulses and vestibular-evoked potentials. J Neurol. 2015;262(5): 1228–1237.
© Wroclaw Medical University