Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
2018, vol. 27, nr 3, March, p. 327–333
doi: 10.17219/acem/65066
Publication type: original article
Language: English
Download citation:
Mortality of patients with acute kidney injury requiring renal replacement therapy
1 Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care, School of Medicine in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland
2 Department of Science, Education and New Medical Technologies, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
3 Department of Cardiac Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Silesian Centre for Heart Diseases, Zabrze, Poland
Abstract
Background. Acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients has a deleterious impact on the prognosis, especially when renal replacement therapy (RRT) is required. This issue has not yet been investigated in the intensive care setting in Poland.
Objectives. The aim of the study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of AKI-RRT subjects, based on a large registry population.
Material and Methods. This observational multicenter study covered 100 demographic and clinical variables from the Silesian Registry of ICUs regarding 15,030 adult patients hospitalized between October 2011 and December 2014. The study group comprised 1,234 AKI individuals (8.2%) who required RRT. The primary outcome was ICU mortality. The length of ICU stay (LOS) was considered the secondary outcome. Observed mortality was compared to that predicted by the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II).
Results. The overall mortality of the patients in the registry was 43.9%; it was higher in AKI-RRT subjects than in non-AKI-RRT counterparts (69.4% vs 41.0%; p < 0.01). The median APACHE II score among AKI-RRT subjects was 26 (IQR: 20–32) points. The observed mortality among AKI-RRT patients was significantly higher than predicted by APACHE II, particularly in individuals with lower baseline risk (overall difference: 14.4%). Six patient-related variables independently predicted ICU mortality with moderate accuracy (area under the receiver operating characteristic, AUROC = 0.675; 95% CI 0.65–0.70). The ICU LOS of AKI-RRT subjects was longer than that of the controls (9.8 [IQR: 4.0–19] vs 5.7 [IQR: 2.1–12] days; p < 0.001).
Conclusion. The mortality of critically ill AKI patients requiring RRT was significantly higher than in the overall ICU population. APACHE II scores underestimate mortality, especially in low-risk AKI-RRT subjects, and therefore should not be used in prognostic models in this cohort.
Key words
acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy, intensive care unit, mortality
References (19)
- Nisula S, Kaukonen KM, Vaara ST, et al. Incidence, risk factors and 90-day mortality of patients with acute kidney injury in Finnish intensive care units: The FINNAKI study. Crit Care Med. 2013;39:420–428.
- Mehta RL, Pascual MT, Soroko S, et al. Spectrum of acute renal failure in the intensive care unit: The PICARD experience. Kidney Int. 2004;66:1613–1621.
- Ostermann M, Chang RW. Acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit according to RIFLE. Crit Care Med. 2007;35:1837–1843.
- Vesconi S, Cruz DN, Fumagalli R, et al. Delivered dose of renal replacement therapy and mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2009;13:R57.
- Uchino S, Bellomo R, Morimatsu H, et al. The beginning and ending supportive therapy for the kidney (B.E.S.T. kidney) investigators. Contin-uous renal replacement therapy: A worldwide practice survey. Intens Care Med. 2007;33:1563–1570.
- Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Acute Kidney Injury Work Group. KDIGO Clinical Practice Guideline for Acute Kidney Injury. Kidney Int Suppl. 2012;2:1–138.
- Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: A severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13:818–829.
- Elseviers MM, Lins RL, Van der Niepen P, et al. Renal replacement therapy is an independent risk factor for mortality in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2010;14:R221.
- Bagshaw SM, Uchino S, Kellum JA, et al. Association between renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients with severe acute kidney injury and mortality. J Crit Care. 2013;28:1011–1118.
- Śmiechowicz J. Prognostic scoring systems for mortality in intensive care units: the APACHE model. Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther. 2015;47:
- Clec’h C, Razafimandimby D, Laouisset M, Chemouni F, Cohen Y. Incidence and outcome of contrast-associated acute kidney injury in a mixed medical-surgical ICU population: A retrospective study. BMC Nephrol. 2013;4:14–31.
- Mehta RL, Kellum JA, Shah SV, et al. Acute kidney injury network. Report of an initiative to improve outcomes in acute kidney injury. Crit Care. 2007;11(2):R31.
- Payen D, de Pont AC, Sakr Y, Spies C, Reinhart K, Vincent JL. A positive fluid balance is associated with a worse outcome in patients with acute renal failure. Crit Care. 2008;12:R74.
- Xu J, Shen B, Fang Y, et al. Postoperative fluid overload is a useful predictor of the short-term outcome of renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery. Medicine. 2015;94(33):e1360.
- Piccinni P, Cruz DN, Gramaticopolo S, et al. Prospective multicenter study on epidemiology of acute kidney injury in the ICU: A critical care nephrology Italian collaborative effort (NEFROINT). Minerva Anestesiol. 2011;77:1072–1083.
- Uppalapati A, Kellum JA. The critically ill patient with acute kidney injury. In: Kellum JA, Bellomo R, Ronco C, eds. Continuous Renal Replace-ment Therapy. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 2010 [e-book].
- Lopes JA, Jorge S, Resina C, et al. Acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis: A contemporary analysis. Int J Infect Dis. 2009;13:176–181.
- Wang X, Jiang L, Wen Y, et al. Risk factors for mortality in patients with septic acute kidney injury in intensive care units in Beijing, China: A multicenter prospective observational study. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:172620. doi: 10.1155/2014/172620
- Beitland S, Moen H, Os I. Acute kidney injury with renal replacement therapy in trauma patients. Acta Anaesth Scand. 2010;54:833–840.