Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 1.736
5-Year Impact Factor – 2.135
Index Copernicus  – 168.52
MEiN – 70 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2016, vol. 25, nr 2, March-April, p. 327–333

doi: 10.17219/acem/58893

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

The Impact of Selected Fluoridated Toothpastes on Dental Erosion in Profilometric Measurement

Katarzyna Fita1,B,C, Urszula Kaczmarek1,A,C,D,E,F

1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Pedodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland


Background. Some fluoridated toothpastes, available commercially, are described to have a protective effect against dental erosion.
Objectives. To evaluate the influence of the selected marketed toothpastes on the human enamel exposed to acid beverages.
Material and Methods. Enamel specimens from extracted human teeth were prepared (n = 40). Specimens were randomly divided into 10 experimental groups, 4 specimens each, which were subjected to acid challenge for 10 min using orange juice (pH 3.79) or Pepsi Cola (pH 2.58) and then immersed for 2 min into a slurry of five marketed toothpastes with distilled water (1 : 3 w/w). The tested toothpastes contained 1450 or 5000 ppm fluoride, CPP-ACP with 900 ppm fluoride, 1450 ppm fluoride with potassium nitrate 5%, all of them as sodium fluoride, and 700 ppm fluoride as amine and sodium fluoride with 3500 ppm SnCl2. Enamel roughness (Ra parameter) by contact profilometer at baseline and after exposure onto soft drinks and slurry was measured.
Results. Exposure to both beverages caused a similar increase of enamel surface roughness. After the specimens immersion into slurries of toothpastes with 1450 or 5000 ppm fluoride, 1450 ppm fluoride with potassium nitrate 5% and CPP-ACP with 900 ppm fluoride the significant decrease of Ra values were found, reaching the baseline values. However, toothpaste with 700 ppm fluoride and 3500 ppm SnCl2 did not cause any fall in Ra value, probably due to other mechanism of action.
Conclusion. Within the limitation of the study we can conclude that the sodium fluoride toothpastes are able to restore the surface profile of enamel exposed shortly to acidic soft drinks.

Key words

dental erosion, fluoridated toothpastes, profilometry

References (29)

  1. Imfeld T: Dental erosion. Definition, classification and links. Eur J Oral Sci 1996, 104, 151–155.
  2. Bartlett D: Intrinsic factors. Monogr Oral Sci 2006, 20, 119–139.
  3. Lussi A, Jaeggi T: Chemical Factors. Monogr Oral Sci 2006, 20, 77–87.
  4. Fejerskov O, Kidd E: Dental caries. Blackwell Munksgaard, Oxford 2008, 2nd ed., 209–231.
  5. Hara AT, Lussi A, Zero DT: Biological factors. Monogr Oral Sci 2006, 20, 88–99.
  6. Zero DT, Lussi A: Behavioral factors. Monogr Oral Sci 2006, 20, 100–105.
  7. Larsen MJ, Nyvad B: Enamel erosion by some soft drinks and orange juices relative to their pH, buffering effect and contents of calcium phosphate. Caries Res 1999, 33, 81–87.
  8. Hemingway CA, Parker DM, Addy M, Barbour ME: Erosion of enamel by non-carbonated soft drinks with and without toothbrushing abrasion. Br Dent J 2006, 201, 447–450.
  9. Rees J, Loyn T, McAndrew R: The acidic and erosive potential of five sports drinks. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2005, 13, 186–190.
  10. Murrell S, Marshall TA, Moynihan PJ, Qian F, Wefel JS: Comparison of in vitro erosion potentials between beverages available in the United Kingdom and the United States. J Dent 2010, 38, 284–289.
  11. Jaeggi T, Lussi A: Prevalence, incidence and distribution of erosion. Monogr Oral Sci 2006, 20, 44–65.
  12. Khambe D, Eversole SL, Mills T, Faller RV: Protective effects of SnF2 – Part II. Deposition and retention on pellicle-coated enamel. Int Dent J 2014, 64, Suppl 1, 11–15.
  13. Attin T, Weiss K, Becker K, Buchalla W, Wiegand A: Impact of modified acidic soft drinks on enamel erosion. Oral Dis 2005, 11, 7–12.
  14. Ganss C, Schlueter N, Klimek J: Retention of KOH-soluble fluoride on enamel and dentine under erosive conditions – a comparison of in vitro and in situ results. Arch Oral Biol 2007, 52, 9–14.
  15. Moretti MJ, Agulhas AC, Sasami KT, Deblem AC, Martinson CC: Effect of different fluoride concentrations of experimental dentifrices on enamel erosion and abrasion. Caries Res 2010, 44, 135–140.
  16. Austin RS, Rodriguez JM, Dunne S, Moazzez R, Bartlett DW: The effect of increasing sodium fluoride concentrations on erosion and attrition of enamel and dentine in vitro. J Dent 2010, 38, 782–787.
  17. Rios D, Magalhães AC, Polo RO, Wiegand A, Attin T, Buzalaf MA: The efficacy of a highly concentrated fluoride dentifrice on bovine enamel subjected to erosion and abrasion. J Amer Dent Assoc 2008, 139, 1652–1656.
  18. Hara AT, Barlow AP, Eckert GJ, Zero DT: Novel in-situ longitudinal model for the study of dentifrices on dental erosion-abrasion. Eur J Oral Sci 2014, 122, 161–167.
  19. Magalhães AC, Rios D, Moino AL, Wiegand A, Attin T, Buzalaf MA: Effect of different concentrations of fluoride in dentifrices on dentin erosion subjected or not to abrasion in situ/ex vivo. Caries Res 2008, 42, 112–116.
  20. Kato MT, Lancia M, Sales-Peres SH, Buzalaf MA: Preventive effect of commercial desensitizing toothpastes on bovine enamel erosion in vitro. Caries Res 2010, 44, 85–89.
  21. German University 2011.
  22. Cooley WE: Reactions of tin (II) and fluoride ions with etched enamel. J Dent Res 1961, 40, 1199–1210.
  23. Jordan TH, Wei SH, Bromberger SH, King JC: Sn3-F3-PO4: the product of the reaction between stannous fluoride and hydroxyapatite. Arch Oral Biol 1971, 16, 241–216.
  24. Baig AA, Faller RV, Yan J, Ji N, Lawless M, Eversole SL: Protective effects of SnF2 – Part I. Mineral solubilisation studies on powdered apatite. Int Dent J 2014, 64, Suppl 1, 4–10.
  25. Faller RV, Eversole SL, Saunders-Burkhardt K: Protective benefits of a stabilised stannous-containing fluoride dentifrice against erosive acid damage. Int Dent J 2014, 64, Suppl 1, 29–34.
  26. Eversole SL, Saunders-Burkhardt K, Faller RV: Erosion protection comparison of stabilised SnF2, mixed fluoride active and SMFP/arginine-containing dentifrices. Int Dent J 2014, 64, Suppl 1, 22–28.
  27. Faller RV, Eversole SL: Protective effects of SnF2 – Part III. Mechanism of barrier layer attachment. Int Dent J 2014, 64, Suppl 1, 16–21.
  28. Hooper S, Seong J, Macdonald E, Claydon N, Hellin N, Barker ML, He T, West NX: A randomised in situ trial, measuring the anti-erosive properties of a stannous-containing sodium fluoride dentifrice compared with a sodium fluoride/potassium nitrate dentifrice. Int Dent J 2014, 64, Suppl 1, 35–42.
  29. Bellamy PG, Harris R, Date RF, Mussett AJ, Manley A, Barker ML, Hellin N, West NX: In situ clinical evaluation of a stabilised, stannous fluoride dentifrice. Int Dent J 2014, 64 Suppl 1, 43–50.