Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 1.727
Index Copernicus  – 166.39
MEiN – 70 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2015, vol. 24, nr 1, January-February, p. 129–137

doi: 10.17219/acem/35476

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Validation of the Polish Version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14

Katarzyna Skośkiewicz-Malinowska1,A,B,C,D,F, Urszula Kaczmarek1,A,E,F, Marek Ziętek2,E,F, Barbara Malicka1,A,B,C,D

1 Department of Conservative Dentistry and Pedodontics, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

2 Department of Periodontology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland


Background. The Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14) is an example of a specific questionnaire used for assessing the quality of life in relation to oral health.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to validate the Polish version of the original English Short-Form OHIP-14 questionnaire.
Material and Methods. The Polish version of the OHIP-14 instrument had been prepared in accordance with generally accepted standards. The main study was conducted among a group of 150 subjects of both genders, aged from 35 to 91 who were randomly selected. Statistical analysis was made by STATISTICA software using the Cronbach alpha reliability test, Mann-Whitney U test, multiple comparison post-hoc test – LSD and Spearman`s correlation coefficient.
Results. The total OHIP-14 score was 8.72 ± 13.39, out of which the highest value was for item 4 (uncomfortable to eat 0.89 ± 1.19). The value of the alpha Cronbach coefficient was above 0.9 for all 14 items of the OHIP-14 instrument indicating excellent internal consistency. Positive relationships between all items of the matrix of the inter-items correlation coefficients were found. The value of coefficients ranged from 0.56 to 0.90 at a significance level of p < 0.01. Construct validity was supported by the fact that oral health condition was correlated with total OHIP score. It was observed that there is a correlation between the quality of life evaluated with the OHIP-14 test and dental condition, dental needs, wearing removable dentures and self-assessment of general health and oral health condition.
Conclusion. The obtained data indicated the reliability and validity of OHIP-14 instrument for the assessment of oral health-related quality of life for in Polish adult population.

Key words

quality of life, elderly, validation, OHIP-14, oral health-related quality of life.

References (30)

  1. O’Boyle CA: Measuring the quality of later life. Phil Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1997, 29, 352, 1871–1879.
  2. Slade GD: Oral health related quality of life is important for patients, but what about populations? Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2012, 40, 2, 39–43.
  3. Murariu A, Hanganu C: Oral Health and Qualty of Life Among 45- to 64-year-old Patients Attending a Clinic in Iasi, Romania. OHDMBSC 2009, 7, 2, 7–11.
  4. Schipper H: Quality of life: principles of the clinical paradigm. J Psychosocial Oncol 1990, 8, 2–3, 171–185.
  5. Saxena S, Carlson D, Billington R: WHOQOL Group: World Health Organisation Quality Of Life, The WHO quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL-Bref): The importance of its items for cross-cultural research. Qual Life Res 2001, 10, 8, 711–721.
  6. Yang Y, Longworth L, Brazier J: An assessment of validity and responsiveness of generic measures of health-related quality of life in hearing impairment. Qual Life Res 2013, 22, 10, 2813–2828.
  7. Brennan DS, Spencer AJ: Dimensions of the health related quality of life measured by EQ-5D+ and OHIP 14. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2004, 13, 2, 35–43.
  8. Bernabe E, de Oliveira CM, Sheiham A: Comparison of the discriminative ability of a generic and a conditionspecific OHRQoL measure in adolescents with and without normative need for orthodontic treatment. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2008, 21, 6, 64–70.
  9. Slade GD, Spencer AJ: Development and evaluation of the Oral Health Impact Profile. Community Dent Health 1994, 11, 1, 3–11.
  10. Locker D: Measuring oral health: a conceptual framework. Community Dent Health 1988, 5, 1, 3–18.
  11. Slade GD: Derivation and validation of a short-form oral health impact profile. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1997, 25, 4, 284–290.
  12. Allen F, Locker D: A modified short version of the oral health impact profile for assessing health-related quality of life in edentulous adults. Int J Prosthodont 2002, 15, 5, 446–450.
  13. Rener-Sitar K, Petricevic N, Celebic A, Marion L: Psychometric Properties of Croatian and Slovenian Short Form of Oral Health Impact Profile Questionnaires. Croat Med J 2008, 49, 4, 536–544.
  14. Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D: Crosscultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol 1993, 46, 1417–1432.
  15. Cronbach LJ: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 1951, 16, 3, 297–334.
  16. Corridore D, Campus G, Guerra F, Ripari F, Sale S, Ottolenghi L: Validation of the Italian version of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 (OHIP-14). Ann Stomatol (Roma) 2014, 4, 3–4, 239–243.
  17. Papagiannopoulou V, Oulis CJ, Papaioannou W, Antonogeorgos G, Yfantopoulos J: Validation of a Greek version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) for use among adults. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2012, 14, 10, 2–10.
  18. Ekanayake L, Perera I: Validation of a Sinhalese translation of the Oral Health Impact Profile-14 for use with older adults. Gerodontology 2004, 20, 2, 95–99.
  19. Ostberg AL, Hall-Lord ML: Oral health-related quality of life in older Swedish people with pain problems. Scand J Caring Sci 2011, 9, 25, 510–516.
  20. Montero-Martin J, Bravo-Perez M, Albaladejo-Martinez A, Hernandez-Martin LA, Rosel-Gallardo EM: Validation the Oral Health Impact Profil (OHIP-14sp) for adults in Spain. Med Oral Patol Cir Bucal 2009, 1, 14, 44–50.
  21. Slusanschi O, Moraru R, Garneata L, Mircescu G, Cuculescu M, Preoteasa E: Validation of a Romanian version of the short form of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) for use in an urban adult population. Oral Health Prev Dent 2013, 11, 3, 235–242.
  22. Navabi N, Nakhaee N, Mirzadeh A: Validation of a Persian Version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP 14). Iran J Public Health 2010, 39, 4, 135–139.
  23. Kushnir D, Zusman SP, Robinson PG: Validation of a Hebrew version of the Oral Health Impact Profile 14. J Public Health Dent 2004, 64, 2, 71–75.
  24. Khalifa N, Allen PF, Abu-Bakr NH, Abdel-Rahman ME: Psychometric properties and performance of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP-14s-ar) among Sudanese adults. J Oral Sci 2013, 55, 2, 123–132.
  25. Ide R, Yamamoto R, Mizoue T: The Japanese version of the Oral Health Impact Profile (OHIP)-validation among young and middle-aged adults. Community Dent Health 2006, 9, 23, 158–163.
  26. Slade GD, Sanders AE: The paradox of better subjective oral health in older age. J Dent Res 2011, 90, 1279–1285.
  27. Roumani T, Oulis CJ, Papagiannopoulou V, Yfantopoulos J: Validation of a Greek version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP-14) in adolescents. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent 2010, 11, 5, 247–252.
  28. Silva ME, Villac EL, Magalhaes CS, Ferreira EF: Impact of tooth loss in quality of life. Cien Saude Colet 2010, 5, 15, 841–850.
  29. Ulinski KG, do Nascimento MA, Lima AM, Benetti AR, Poli-Frederico RC, Fernandes KB, Fracasso ML, Maciel SM: Factors related to oral health-related quality of independent brazilian elderly. Int J Dent 2013, 2013, 705047.
  30. Motallebnejad M, Hadian H, Mehdizadeh S, Hajiahmadi M: Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the oral health impact profile (OHIP)-14. Caspian J Intern Med 2011, 2, 4, 314–320.