Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 1.736
5-Year Impact Factor – 2.135
Index Copernicus  – 168.52
MEiN – 70 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2014, vol. 23, nr 6, November-December, p. 977–985

Publication type: original article

Language: English

The Use of Light-Cured Resin as an Alternative Method of Occlusal Splints Manufacturing – In Vitro Study

Mieszko Więckiewicz1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Klaus W. Boening2,A,B,C,D,E,F, Gert Richter2,A,B,C,D,E,F, Włodzimierz Więckiewicz3,C,D,E,F

1 Division of Dental Materials, Faculty of Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

2 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Medicine, Dresden University of Technology, Germany

3 Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, Faculty of Dentistry, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland


Background. Temporomandibular disorders are very common nowadays. One of the methods to treat these problems is occlusal splint therapy. Modern materials should be introduced to this treatment.
Objectives. The aim of this paper was to evaluate the properties of light-activated urethane dimethacrylate and the quality of the bonds it creates with thermoforming foils.
Material and Methods. Thermoforming foils were covered with light-cured resin. A bond was formed between the materials using an adhesive. A coating lacquer was used on the resin as a final preparatory step. Three laboratory tests were run: dye penetrant inspection, a Vickers microhardness test and a linear polymerization shrinkage test. The materials were layered and then cured with a polymerizing lamp emitting light of a wavelength of 400 Nm, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All the occlusal splints were fitted to upper dental arch. The devices had been made in an articulator on specially prepared gypsum models. The results were analyzed statistically using a one-sided binomial test, Spearman’s rank-order correlation coefficient and the Friedman ANOVA (p = 0.05).
Results. In the dye penetrant inspection, only one sample out of sixty showed the effects of color penetration to the adhesive connection. The dye only penetrated the layer of lacquer coating the resin. The average value of the Vickers microhardness test with a load of F = 50 g applied to the material surface for 30 s was HV0.05 = 7.43 N/mm2. The average linear shrinkage of the resin observed after polymerization was 1.175%.
Conclusion. Light-cured resin and an adhesive connection between the resin and thermoforming foil do not show susceptibility even to strong dye. The maximum polymerization shrinkage occurs immediately after curing. The light-cured resin that was tested seems to be a good alternative method for occlusal splints manufacturing.

Key words

occlusal splints, light-cured resin, dye penetrant inspection, Vickers microhardness, polymerization shrinkage.

References (30)

  1. de Kanter RJ, Truin GJ, Burgersdijk RC, Van‘t Hof MA, Battistuzzi PG, Kalsbeek H, Kayser AF: Prevalence in the Dutch adult population and a meta-analysis of signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder. J Dent Res 1993, 72, 11, 1509–1518.
  2. Poveda Roda R, Bagán JV, Díaz Fernández JM, Hernández Bazán S, Jiménez Soriano Y: Review of temporomandibular joint pathology. Part I: Classification, epidemiology and risk factors. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Buca 2007, 12, 4, 292–298.
  3. LeResche L: Epidemiology of temporomandibular disorders: implications for the investigation of etiologic factors. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1997, 8, 3, 291–305.
  4. Okeson JP: Long-term treatment of disk-interference disorders of the temporomandibular joint with anterior repositioning occlusal splints. J Prosthet Dent 1988, 60, 5, 611–616.
  5. Ramfjord SP, Ash MM: Reflections on the Michigan occlusal splint. J Oral Rehabil 1994, 21, 5, 491–500.
  6. Dao TT, Lavigne GJ: Oral Splints: the Crutches for Temporomandibular Disorders and Bruxism? Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 1998, 9, 3, 345–361.
  7. Fayed MM, El-Mangoury NH, El-Bokle DN, Belal AI: Occlusal splint therapy and magnetic resonance imaging. World J Orthod 2004, 5, 2, 133–140.
  8. Noriyuki N, Masahiko F, Tomohiro I, Kazunobu K, Toshihiko M: Effects of jaw clenching while wearing an occlusal splint on awareness of tiredness, bite force, and EEG power spectrum. J Prosthot Res 2009, 53, 3, 120–125.
  9. Karolyi M: Beobachtungen über Pyorrhea Alveolaris. Oesterr-Ung Vierteljahrschr Zahnheilk 1901, 17, 279–283.
  10. Tandon R, Gupta S, Kumar Agarwal S: Denture base materials: From past to future. Indian J Dent Sci 2010, 2, 2, 33–39.
  11. Seppäläinen AM, Rajaniemi R: Local neurotoxicity of methyl-meth-acrylate among dental technicians. Am J Ind Med 1984, 5, 6, 471–477.
  12. Magdaleno F, Ginestal E: Side effects of stabilization occlusal splints: a report of three cases and literature review. Cranio 2010, 28, 2, 128–135.
  13. dos Santos Jr J, Gurklis M: Immediate fabrication of occlusal bitesplints using visible light-cured material. Compend Contin Educ 1994, 15, 2, 228–232.
  14. Danesh G, Lippold C, Joos U, Meyer U: Technical and clinical assessment of the use of a new material-based splint in orthognathic surgery. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006, 35, 9, 796–799.
  15. Terai H, Shimahara M: Intermaxillary fixation using thermoforming plate. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002, 60, 9, 1092–1094.
  16. Lightdon Splint. Technical Data Sheet. Unna, Germany 2010.
  17. Lightdon Splint. Safety Data Sheet. Unna, Germany 2007.
  18. European Norm EN ISO 6507-1, 2005.
  19. Pazinatto FB, Campos BB, Costa LC, Atta MT: Effect of the number of thermocycles on microleakage of resin composite restorations. Pesqui Odontol Bras 2003, 17, 4, 337–341.
  20. Arias VG, Campos IT, Pimenta LAF: Microleakage Study of Three Adhesive Systems. Braz Dent J 2004, 15, 3, 194–198.
  21. Mali P, Deshpande S, Singh A: Microleakage of restorative materials: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2006, 24, 1, 15–18.
  22. Al-Boni R, Raja OM: Microleakage evaluation of silorane based composite versus methacrylate based composite. J Conserv Dent 2010, 13, 3, 152–155.
  23. Koyuturk AE, Kusgoz A, Ulker M, Yesilyurt C: Effects of mechanical and thermal aging on microleakage of different fissure sealants. Dent Mater J 2008, 27, 6, 795–801.
  24. Danesh G, Lippold C, Ziebura T, Reinhardt KJ, Schafer E, Ehmer U: In vitro investigations on suitability of light-cured resins for interocclusal splints: part II: Surface Hardness. J Orofac Orthop 2006, 67, 2, 138–147.
  25. Chuenarrom C, Benjakul P, Daosodsai P: Effect of indentation load and time on Knoop and Vickers Microharness Tests for enamel and dentin. Mater Res 2009, 12, 4, 473–476.
  26. Cattani-Lorente M, Godin Ch, Bouillaguet S, Meyer JM: Linear polymerization shrinkage of new restorative composite resins. Eur Cells Mater 2003, 5, 1, 40–41.
  27. Arora S, Khindaria SK, Garg S, Mittal S: Comparative evaluation of linear dimensional changes of four commercially available heat cure acrylic resins. Contemp Clin Dent 2011, 2, 3, 182–187.
  28. Inoue K, Howashi G, Kanetou T, Masumi S, Ueno O, Fujii K: Effect of light intensity on linear shrinkage of photo-activated composite resins during setting. J Oral Rehabil 2005, 32, 1, 22–27.
  29. Toledano M, Osorio R, Osorio E, Fuentes V, Prati C, Garcia-Godoy F: Sorption and solubility of resin-based restorative dental materials. J Dent 2003, 31, 1, 43–50.
  30. Danesh G, Lippold C, Mischke KL, Varzideh B, Reinhardt KJ, Dammaschke T, Schäfer E: Polymerization characteristics of lightand auto-curing resins for individual splints. Dent Mater 2006, 22, 5, 426–433.