Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 2.1
5-Year Impact Factor – 2.2
Scopus CiteScore – 3.7 (CiteScore Tracker 3.3)
Index Copernicus  – 161.11; MNiSW – 70 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2014, vol. 23, nr 1, January-February, p. 9–16

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Morphometry of Human Musculus Gluteus Maximus in Foetal Period

Alicja Kędzia1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Małgorzata Janeczko1,B,D, Katarzyna Miśkiewicz1,B,D, Krzysztof Dudek2,B,C,D

1 Department of Normal Anatomy, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

2 Institute of Machines Design and Operation, Wroclaw University of Technology, Poland


Background. Magnus gluteal muscle (musculus gluteus maximus) belongs to the group of lower limb girdle muscles. It is one of the biggest muscles in human organism and is located mostly superficially in gluteal region. Literature provides discussion concerning its role in movement such as walking, running and climbing as well as plastic surgery in reconstructive operations of trochanter. Magnus gluteal muscle plays an important role in orthopaedic surgery.
Objectives. The goal of the study was to analyse the human magnus gluteal muscle in the foetal period.
Material and Methods. The analysis was carried out on 154 muscles originating from human foetuses (including 30 females – 39%) belonging to the collection of Normal Anatomy Dept. of Wroclaw Medical University. The body length was assessed with the use of vertex-tuberal (v-tub) length and it was included in the range 107–205 mm, which corresponds with the period 17–30 weeks of foetal life. The survey incorporated the following methods: anthropological, preparational and image acquisition which was acquired with the use of high-resolution digital camera. In order to take computer measurements, the following systems were exploited: Image J and Scion for Windows. Statistical analysis was carried out with the use of STATISTICA package v. 9 (t-Student test).
Results. The magnus gluteal muscle was analysed in respect to sexual dimorphism and symmetry. On the basis of elicited parameters, the model of muscle increase in foetal period was defined. The following measurements were taken: v-tub, vertex-plantare (v-pl), body mass, muscle particular sides lengths and distance between corresponding measurement points. In every muscle, the lengths of four sections forming the circumference as well as the area were measured.
Conclusion. No difference was observed in foetal magnus gluteal muscle sexual dimorphism or symmetry (p > 0.05). The correlation diagram was used to calculate the muscle weekly increase in foetal period. The results suggest that lesions and pathologies in the region of magnus gluteal muscle are acquired in post foetal period.

Key words

human musculus gluteus maximus, prenatal period, morphometry.

References (19)

  1. Kirici Y, Ozan H: Double gluteus maximus muscle with associated variations in the gluteal region. Surg Radiol Anat 1999, 21, 397–400.
  2. Lieberman DE, Raichlen DA, Pontzer H, Bramble DM: The human gluteus maximus and its role in running. J Exp Biol 2006, 209, 2143–2155.
  3. Reiman MP, Bolgla LA, Loudon JK: A literature review of studies evaluating gluteus maximus and gluteus medius activation during rehabilitation exercises. Physiother Theory Pract 2012, 28, 257–68. Epub 2011 Oct 18.
  4. Whiteside LA: Treating abductor deficiency: a transference technique. Orthopedics 2011, 34, e470-472. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20110714-34.
  5. Whiteside LA: Surgical technique: Transfer of the anterior portion of the gluteus maximus muscle for abductor deficiency of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 70, 503–510.
  6. Ikenaga M, Miyazaki M, Yasui M, Mishima H: A case of total pelvic exenteration and reconstruction of perianal skin defect using a VY advancement of bilateral gluteus maximus musculocutaneous flaps for anal canal cancer associated with anal fistula. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 2010, 37, 2650–2652.
  7. Kim JT, Kim YH, Naidu S: Perfecting the design of the gluteus maximus perforator-based island flap for coverage of buttock defects. Plast Reconstr Surg 2010, 125, 1744–1751.
  8. Anderin C, Martling A, Lagergren J, Ljung A: Short term outcome after gluteus maximus myocutaneous flap reconstruction of the pelvic floor following extra-levator abdominoperineal excision of the rectum. Colorectal Dis 2011, 8, doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02848.x. [Epub ahead of print)
  9. Carnevale A, del Castillo V, Sotillo AG, Larrondo J: Congenital absence of gluteal muscles. Report of two sibs. Clin Genet 1976, 10, 135–138.
  10. Kolaczkowski Z, Tobola S: The gluteus maximus muscle in the human fetus. Folia Morphol (Warsz) 1970, 29, 135–140.
  11. Kędzia A, Ziajkiewicz M, Seredyn A, Dudek K: Computer morphometric analysis of the Palmaris longus muscle in fetal period. Adv Clin Exp Med 2009, 18, 5, 437–447.
  12. Kędzia A, Wałek E, Podleśny K, Dudek K: Musculus sartorius metrology in the fetal period. Adv Clin Exp Med 2011, 20, 5, 567–574.
  13. Image J: Image Processing and Analysis in Java,
  14. [Scion) –
  15. Bardeen CR, Lewis WH: Development of the limbs, body-wall and back in man. Amer J Anat 1901, 1, 1–37.
  16. Stickland NC: Muscle development in the human fetus as exemplified by m. sartorius: a quantitative study. J Anat 1981, 132, 557–579.
  17. Hewer EE. The development of muscle in the human foetus. J Anat 1927, 62, 72–78.
  18. Matar N, Quilichini J, Bosc R, Benjoar MD: Breast reconstruction with superior gluteal artery perforator (SGAP) flap without intraoperative setup change. About eight cases. Ann Chir Plast Esthet 2010, 55, 539–546. Epub 2010 Oct 16.
  19. Granzow JW, Levine JL, Chiu ES, Allen RJ: Breast reconstruction with gluteal artery perforator flaps. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2006, 59, 614–621. Epub 2006 Mar 22.