Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 2.1
5-Year Impact Factor – 2.2
Scopus CiteScore – 3.4 (CiteScore Tracker 3.4)
Index Copernicus  – 161.11; MEiN – 140 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2013, vol. 22, nr 3, May-June, p. 439–447

Publication type: review article

Language: English

Usefulness Assessment Indices of Non-Carious Dental Defects with Consideration of Aetiological Factors and the Quality Criterion

Ocena przydatności wskaźników ubytków zębów pochodzenia niepróchnicowego z uwzględnieniem czynników etiologicznych oraz kryterium jakości

Marta Tanasiewicz1,A,C,E,F, Irena Zalewska2,B,C,D

1 Department of Conservative Dentistry with Endodontics, Medical University of Silesia, Bytom, Poland

2 NZOZ Dental-Lux, Katowice, Poland

Abstract

Abstract
Much attention is being paid in the current literature to the necessity of raising awareness of the problem of tooth wear. The aim of this paper is to discuss advantages, disadvantages and modifications of currently used tooth wear indices with particular attention drawn to the advantages of their use both in everyday practice and epidemiological research, as well as an attempt to make the choice of a wear index easier and better adjusted for the needs of a single patient or a group of patients. The paper compares index assessment attempts available in the current literature in the context of validity of criteria choices and reliability results. The role of supporting methods is stressed as they facilitate both diagnosis and storing of data on tooth wear, as well as usefulness of indices which comprise thera- peutic recommendations (Adv Clin Exp Med 2013, 22, 3, 439–447).
 

Streszczenie

Streszczenie
We współczesnym piśmiennictwie zwraca się uwagę na konieczność podniesienia świadomości co do wagi pro- blematyki starcia zębów. Celem pracy było omówienie wad, zalet i modyfikacji obecnie stosowanych wskaźników starcia ze zwróceniem uwagi na korzyści płynące z ich stosowania zarówno w codziennej praktyce, jak i badaniach epidemiologicznych, a także próba ułatwienia wyboru wskaźnika starcia najlepiej dostosowanego do potrzeb danej jednostki czy grupy pacjentów. W prezentowanej pracy poddano analizie obecne w piśmiennictwie oceny poszcze- gólnych wskaźników w kontekście trafności doboru kryteriów, czy wyników rzetelności. Podkreślono rolę metod pomocniczych, uławiających zarówno diagnostykę, jak i archiwizację danych dotyczących starcia oraz użyteczność zastosowanych wskaźników (Adv Clin Exp Med 2013, 22, 3, 439–447).
 

Key words

Key words: non-carious defects.

Słowa kluczowe

Słowa kluczowe: ubytki niepróchnicowe.

References (37)

  1. Smith BG, Robb ND: The prevalence of tooth wear in 1007 dental patients. J Oral rehabil 1996, 23, 232–239.
  2. Johansson A, Haraldson T, Omar R, Kiliavidis S, Carlsson GE: A system for assessing the severity and progression of occlusal tooth wear. J Oral rehabil 1993, 20, 125–131.
  3. Smith BG, Knight JK: An Index for measuring the wear of teeth. Br Dent J 1984, 156, 435–438.
  4. Van’t Spijker A, Rodriguez JM, Kreulen CM, Bronkhorst EM, Bartlett DW, Van’t Creugers NH: Prevalence of tooth wear in adults. Int J Prosthodont 2009, 22, 35–42.
  5. Donachie MA, Walls AW: Assessment of tooth wear in an ageing population. J Dent 1995, 23, 157–164.
  6. Bartlett D: The implication of laboratory research on tooth wear and erosion. Oral Dis 2005, 11, 3–6.
  7. Lussi A: Dental erosion – clinical diagnosis and case history taking. Eur J Oral Sci 1996, 104, 191–198.
  8. Borcic J, Anic I, Urek MM, Ferreri S: The prevalence of non-carious cervical lesions in permanent dentition. J Oral rehabil 2004, 31, 117–123.
  9. Bishop K, Kelleher M, Briggs P, Joshi R: Wear now? An update on the etiology of tooth wear. Quintessence Int 1997, 28, 305–313.
  10. de Carvalho Sales-Peres M, Goya S, de Araujo JJ, Sales-Peres A, Lauris JR, Buzalat-Carvalho MA: Prevalence of dental wear among 12-year-old Brazilian adolescents using a modification of the tooth wear index. Public Health 2008, 122(9), 942–948.
  11. Bartlett D, Dugmore C: Pathological or physiological erosion – is there a relationship to age? Clin Oral Invest 2008, 12 (Suppl. 1), 527–531.
  12. Al-Dlaigan YH, Shaw L, Smith A: Dental erosion in a group of British 14-year-old school children. Part I: Prevalence and influence of differing socioeconomic backgrounds. Br Dent J 2001, 190, 145–149.
  13. Lewis KJ, Smith BG: The relationship of erosion and attrition in extensive tooth tissue loss. Case reports. Br Dent J 1973, 135, 400–404.
  14. Bartlett DW: retrospective long-term monitoring of tooth wear using study models. Br Dent J 2003, 22, 194(4), 211–213.
  15. Ganss C, Klimek J, Giese K: Dental erosion in children and adolescents – a cross-sectional and longitudinal investigation using study models. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2001, 29, 264–271.
  16. Berg-Beckhoff G, Kutchmann M, Bardehle D: Methodological considerations concerning the development of oral dental erosion indexes: literature survey, validity and reliability. Clin Oral Invest 2008, 12(Suppl. 1), 551–558.
  17. Donachie MA, Walls AW: The tooth wear index: a flawed epidemiological tool in an ageing population group. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1996, 24, 152–158.
  18. Bardsley PF, Taylor S, Milosević A: Epidemiological studies of tooth wear and dental erosion in 14-year-old children in North West England. Part 1: The relationship with water fluoridation and social deprivation. Br Dent J 2004, 197, 413–416.
  19. Fares J, Shirodaria S, Chiu K, Ahmad N, Sherriff M, Bartlett D: A new index of tooth wear. reproduricity and application to a sample of 18- to 30-year-old university students. Caries res 2009, 43, 119–125.
  20. Steele JG, Walls AW: Using partial recording to asses tooth wear in older adults. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000, 28, 18–25.
  21. Hooper SM, Meredith N, Jagger DC: The development of a new index for measurement of incisal/occlusal tooth wear. J Oral rehabil 2004, 31, 206–212.
  22. Silness J, Berge M, Johannessen G: Prevalence, pattern and severity of incisal wear in dental students. Acta Odontol Scand 1994, 52, 178–181.
  23. Lussi A, Schaffner M, Hotz P, Suter P: Dental erosion in a population of Swiss adults. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 1991, 19, 286–290.
  24. Holbrook WP, Ganss C: Is diagnosing exposed dentine a suitable tool for grading erosive loss? Clin Oral Invest 2008, 12(Suppl. 1), 533–539.
  25. Bardsley PF: The evolution of tooth wear indices. Clin Oral Invest 2008, 12(Suppl. 1), 515–519.
  26. Linkosalo E, Markkanen H: Dental erosions in relationship in lactovegetarian diet. Scand J Dent res 1985, 93, 436–441.
  27. Arnadottir IB, Saemundsson SR, Holbrook WP: Dental erosion in Icelandic teenagers in relation to dietary and lifestyle factors. Acta Odontol Scand 2003, 61, 25–28.
  28. Eccles JD: Dental erosion of nonindustrial origin. A clinical survey and classification. J Prosthet Dent 1979, 42, 649–653.
  29. Xhonga FA, Valdmanis S: Geographic comparisons of the incidence of dental erosion in a two centre sudy. J Oral rehabil 1983, 10, 269–277.
  30. Larsen IB, Westergaard J, Stoltze K, Larsen AI, Gyntelberg F, Holmstrup P: A clinical index for evaluating and monitoring dental erosion. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol 2000, 28, 211–217.
  31. Bartlett D, Ganss C, Lussi A: Basic erosive wear examination (BEWE): a new scoring system for scientific and clinical needs. Clin Oral Invest 2008, 12(Suppl. 1), 565–568.
  32. Mulic A, Tveit AB, Wang NJ, Hove LH, Espelid I, Skaare AB: reliability of two clinical scoring systems for dental erosive wear. Caries res 2010, 44, 294–299.
  33. Young A, Amaechi BT, Dugmore C, Holbrook P, Nunn J, Schiffner U, Lussi A, Ganss C: Current erosion indices – flawed or valid? Summary. Clin Oral Invest 2008, 12(Suppl. 1), 559–563.
  34. Ganss C, Klimek J, Lussi A: Accuracy and consistency of the visual diagnosis of exposed dentine on worn occlusal/incisal surfaces. Caries res 2006, 40, 208–212.
  35. Lussi A, Jaeggi T: Erosion – diagnosis and risk factors. Clin Oral Invest 2008, 12(Suppl. 1), 55–513.
  36. Oilo G, Dahl BL, Hatle G, Gad AL: An index for evaluating wear of teeth. Acta Odontol Scand 1987, 45, 361–365.
  37. Schlueter N, Ganss C, De Sanctis S, Klimek J: Evaluation of a profilometrical method for monitoring erosive tooth wear. Eur J Oral Sci 2005, 113, 505–511.
© Wroclaw Medical University