Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
5-Year IF – 2.0, IF – 1.9, JCI (2024) – 0.43
Scopus CiteScore – 4.3
Q1 in SJR 2024, SJR score – 0.598, H-index: 49 (SJR)
ICV – 161.00; MNiSW – 70 pts
Initial editorial assessment and first decision within 24 h

ISSN 1899–5276 (print), ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2024, vol. 33, nr 7, July, p. 717–728

doi: 10.17219/acem/171537

Publication type: original article

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:


Fang L, Zheng M, He F. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiseptic molecular actions of gedunin against lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis in experimental rats. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2024;33(7):717–728. doi:10.17219/acem/171537

Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiseptic molecular actions of gedunin against lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis in experimental rats

Liyun Fang1,A,D,F, Mao Zheng2,B, Fengying He2,C,F

1 Department of Pediatrics, The Affiliated Hospital of Northwest University, Xi’an No.3 Hospital, China

2 Department of Emergency, Xi’an Children’s Hospital (Xi’an Jiaotong University Affiliated Children’s Hospital), China

Graphical abstract


Graphical abstracts

Abstract

Background. Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction without effective therapeutic options. Lipopolysaccharide (LPS), a bacterial endotoxin, is known to induce sepsis. It is associated with oxidative stress, inflammation and multiple organ failure. Gedunin (GN) is a tetranortriterpenoid isolated from the Meliaceae family. Gedunin possesses numerous pharmacological properties, including antibacterial, anti-inflammatory, antiallergic, and anticancer activities. However, the molecular anti-inflammatory mechanism of GN in sepsis has not been established.

Objectives. The aim of the study was to explore the antioxidant and anti-inflammatory molecular actions underlying the antiseptic activity of GN in an LPS-induced rat model.

Materials and methods. Rats were randomized into 4 sets: group 1 (control) was given 1 mL of dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) by gavage, group 2 rats were treated with LPS (100 μg/kg body weight (BW), intraperitoneally (ip.)), group 3 rats were given LPS (100 μg/kg BW, ip.)+GN (50 mg/kg BW in DMSO), and rats in the group 4 were given GN (50 mg/kg BW in DMSO) alone. We studied hepatic markers, inflammatory cytokines and antioxidants using specific biochemical kits and analyzed their statistical significance. Histopathology of liver, lungs and kidney tissues was also explored. The mRNA levels and conducted protein investigations were performed using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) and western blot, respectively.

Results. Our findings revealed that GN significantly (p < 0.05) inhibited oxidative stress, lipid peroxides, toxic markers, pro-inflammatory cytokines, and histological changes, thereby preventing multi-organ impairment. Additionally, GN attenuated the HMGβ1/NLRP3/NF-κB signaling pathway and prevented the degradation of Iκβα.

Conclusions. Gedunin is a promising natural antiseptic agent for LPS-induced sepsis in rats.

Key words: oxidative stress, sepsis, lipopolysaccharide, gedunin, HMGβ1/NLRP3/NF-κB pathway

Background

Sepsis is triggered by microorganisms or microbial toxins, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Lipopolysaccharide, an endotoxin of Gram-negative bacteria, causes a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS).1, 2 In the USA, 700,000 sepsis cases with more than 200,000 deaths occur annually and the condition contributes to 10% of deaths.3 Sepsis is the invasion of microbes or endotoxins into cells and body fluids and it activates the inflammatory pathways.4 The healing process is initiated by an inflammatory response. However, high doses of endotoxin cause imbalances in reactive oxygen species (ROS), inflammatory cytokines and homeostasis, which lead to organ dysfunction.5 Lipopolysaccharide triggers the discharge of strong pro-inflammatory intermediaries, causing cardiac disorders, multiple organ disorders, tremors, and death.6, 7 Sepsis induces a drop in general vascular function, leading to multiple organ failure.8 Almost half of the patients with septic shock develop acute renal failure (ARF) and require dialysis.9 Sepsis leads to hemodynamic fluctuations such as hypotension, drop in renal blood flow, and local renal ischemia causing ARF.10 Moreover, the condition causes tissue impairment, multiple organ dysfunction, acute lung disease, septic shock, and death.11, 12 Due to its critical nature, sepsis attracts the attention of clinicians and researchers. Thus, both in-vitro and in-vivo experiments are being conducted to find new antiseptic agents.13

An endotoxin, LPS, has been used to prompt sepsis in the experimental rat model.14 Lipopolysaccharide activates the inflammatory cascade by stimulating macrophage and monocyte cell membrane receptors. This triggers nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) signaling pathways, which in turn stimulate the discharge of cytokines, pro-inflammatory intermediaries and ROS from leukocytes, plasma and blood cells.15 The key cytokines, namely interleukin (IL)-1β, tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) and IL-6, are significant controllers in the inflammatory reaction during sepsis. The TNF-α is a primary mediator of septic shock. It is released instantly after infection and causes the pathological progression of septic shock. In reaction to cytokines, ROS are produced from neutrophils and phagocytic cells, which trigger oxidative stress.16 The free radicals produce malondialdehyde (MDA) and impair biomolecules. This leads to various chronic illnesses, namely osteoporosis, atherosclerosis, cancer, and arthritis.15, 17 Unrestrained inflammation and extreme oxidative stress are the prominent signs of sepsis that culminate in multiple organ failures and mortality.18 Due to an excess of free radicals, oxidative stress is  rummaged by antioxidant guard systems, including catalase (CAT), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px).19 Hence, sepsis can be treated with antibiotics, antioxidants, corticosteroids, and anti-inflammatory mediators.

Oxidative stress is crucial in sepsis-associated transience and multi-organ impairment.16, 18 Many researchers have been attentive to anti-cytokines, drug targets and antioxidants to control the pathophysiology of sepsis-prompted acute lung injury (ALI).13, 19 The high mobility group box (HMGβ1) protein plays a vital part in the development and evolution of sepsis-prompted lung damage.20 The HMGβ1 is stimulated by immune cells, such as macrophages, dendritic cells and mononuclear cells, and induced by inflammatory cytokines and endotoxins.21 Hence, the restraint of HMGβ1 discharge mitigates SIRS and sepsis-induced organ injury.22 A previous study on the activation of inflammatory caspases and processing of pro-IL-β also highlighted the key role of NOD-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) inflammasomes in inflammation.23 Increased NLRP3 expression causes the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, immune cell gathering, and augmented stimulation of the adaptive immune reaction.23, 24 Hou et al.25 described that NLRP3 facilitated the increased secretion of HMGβ1 in lung injury. Thus, drugs targeting the inhibition of HMGβ1 and NLPR3 have a possible role in the treatment of sepsis and associated lung failure. Potent antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities might reduce the severity of sepsis. Isik et al.26 demonstrated that sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is the accepted approach to stage the clinically negative axilla, and the incidence of lymphedema (LE) after SLNB is about 5%. Furthermore, the authors hypothesized that patients undergoing axillary excision of >5 lymph nodes (LNs) were at an increased risk of developing LE.

Gedunin (GN) is the main tetranortriterpenoid sequestered from the neem tree. Gedunin is identified to restrain the stress-prompted chaperone heat shock protein, Hsp90.27 Blocking Hsp90 produces a multi-directed beneficial method since Hsp90 proteins are associated with numerous transcription factors and kinases, particularly NF-κB.28 The Hsp90 regulators diminish inflammation in various experimental models, such as atherosclerosis, uveitis and lung inflammation.29, 30 Gedunin can restrain prostate gland, ovary and colon cancer cell proliferation.31, 32 It also subdues articular inflammation in a zymosan-induced acute articular inflammation model.33 Gedunin affixes to MD-2, damages TLR4/MD-2/CD14 pathways, and reduces LPS-stimulated inflammatory reactions in macrophages in silico and surface plasmon resonance studies.34 However, the anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and in-vivo antiseptic efficacy of GN in LPS-induced sepsis has not yet been evaluated.

Objectives

Hence, the current research explores the molecular actions underlying the antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antiseptic activity of GN in the LPS-induced rat model.

Materials and methods

Chemicals

Gedunin, LPS, dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO), antibodies, antibiotics, and all the biochemicals were obtained from Gibco (Carlsbad, USA). The antibodies for western blot analysis were acquired from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, USA).

Trial animals

A total of 40 Wistar albino male rats weighing 225–250 g were obtained from Xi’an Yifengda Biotechnology Co., Ltd (XI’an, China). Rats were housed in aseptic polypropylene cages under fixed laboratory circumstances. The animals were nourished with a regular pellet diet ad libitum. Rats were adapted for 7 days before the experiments. The trial was approved by the of Xi’an Zhongkai Animal Experiments Medical Research Ethics Committee (approval No. 4894).

Experimental design

The animals were randomized into 4 sets of 10 rats each. Group 1 was the control group and was given 1 mL of DMSO for 10 days by gavage. The rats in the group 2 were given a single dosage of LPS (100 μg/kg body weight (BW), intraperitoneally (ip.)). Group 3 rats were administered LPS (100 μg/kg b.w., i.p.)+GN (50 mg/kg b.w. in DMSO). The rats in the group 4 were treated with GN (50 mg/kg b.w. in DMSO) alone. A single intraperitoneal dose of LPS was injected, and 1 mL of GN was given daily for 10 days by alimentation. After the experiment, all animals were anesthetized and euthanized by cervical dislocation.

Sample preparation

The blood of the rats was drawn through cardiac puncture and centrifuged at 4,000 rpm. The serum was separated and preserved at −80°C. The residual serum was recollected at 4°C to estimate hepatic markers. Tissues (liver, kidney and lung) were dissected and divided into 2 parts. One portion was kept at −80°C for antioxidant assessments. The second part of the tissues was fixed in 10% formalin for histopathological assessment.35

Biochemical assessments

For biochemical analyses, tissues of the rats’ liver, kidney and lung were washed with deionized ice-cold water. One gram of tissue sample was treated with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS, pH: 7.2, 1:9 ratio) and was homogenized. Afterward, the homogenate was centrifuged for 1 h, and the supernatant was analyzed. Malondialdehyde, CAT, SOD, and GSH-Px were determined by the kits acquired from Elabscience (Wuhan, China). Cytokine levels were quantified by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) kit (Cayman Chemical, Ann Arbor, USA) as per the manufacturer’s protocol. Toxicity markers (aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT)) were assayed using kits delivered by Cayman Chemical, according to the manufacturer’s instruction.

Histopathological analysis

Liver, kidney and lung tissues were preserved with formaldehyde (10%), fixed in paraffin blocks, cut into slices, and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E). Successively, stained tissues were identified for histological changes and inflammation under a light microscope (model CX33; Olympus Corp., Tokyo, Japan).

Determination of mRNA levels by qRT-PCR

The total RNA of lung tissue was sequestered using TRIzol® reagent (Abcam, Waltham, USA), according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The isolated RNA was converted to cDNA through reverse transcription by using a high-capacity cDNA Reverse Transcription Kit (Beyotime Biotechnology). FastStart SYBR Green Master Mix (Abcam) was used to explore the cDNAs. The band intensity was scrutinized with 1.5% agarose gel electrophoresis. Finally, the band intensity was measured by Image J v. 1.48 software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, USA). The fold variations were calculated using the 2−ΔΔCt formula. The used real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) primer sequences are as follows (Table 1):

Western blotting analysis

Hepatic tissue was dissected 12 h after the induction of sepsis.33 The tissues were cleaned twice with PBS and lysed with a cold lysis buffer consisting of 0.01% protease inhibitor. Then, these were preserved on ice for half an hour. The lysate was cold (4°C) and centrifuged for 10 min at 13,000 rpm, and the resulting solution was passed through sodium dodecyl-sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) (10%) and shifted electrophoretically to the polyvinylidene difluoride (PVDF) film. Then, 5% of fat-free milk was used to block the membrane. Next, it was conserved with the primary antibodies, namely IRAK-1 (sc-5288), TRAF-6 (sc-8409), Iκβα (sc-1643), MyD88 (sc-74532), and β-actin (sc-69879), followed by horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibodies (1:500 dilution). The β-actin was utilized as a reference. The membrane was reviewed using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) (Millipore, Burlington, USA).

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were conducted using GraphPad Prism v. 8.0.1 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA) and SPSS v. 25 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA) software. The measurement data were reported as median and quartiles. The normality of the distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. All parameters had normal distribution for which we used a nonparametric test due to small sample sizes. The comparison among groups was performed using the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by Dunn’s test to compare variables among the groups. When the test standard had a value of p < 0.05, the difference was considered statistically significant.

Results

All variables had a normal distribution. Table 2 demonstrates the results of compared variables among the groups.

GN reduces hepatic toxicity enzyme markers

Hepatic toxicity serum enzymes (AST and ALT) were significantly elevated (p < 0.05) in LPS-treated septic rats compared to controls (Figure 1A,B). The hepatic enzyme levels were reduced in the LPS-treated GN group. Normal marker enzyme levels were detected in the GN alone-treated rats and control rats. Hence, GN may be effective in reducing liver damage.

GN alleviates pro-inflammatory cytokine levels

The serum cytokines, namely IL-6, IL-10, IL-1β, and TNF-α, were significantly elevated (p < 0.05) in LPS-induced sepsis animals (Figure 2A–D). The cytokine levels declined in the GN+LPS-prompted septic rats. Cytokine levels in control rats and GN alone-treated rats were similar.

Effect of GN on MDA and antioxidant enzymes in hepatic tissue

Malondialdehyde levels in liver tissue were significantly higher (p < 0.05), and antioxidant enzyme (SOD, CAT and GSH-Px) levels were lower in the LPS-induced sepsis animals compared to the control rats (Figure 3A–D). The GN+LPS-treated rats had significantly decreased (p < 0.05) MDA levels and increased antioxidant enzymes compared to the LPS alone-treated rats. The GN alone-treated rats had similar results to the control rats.

Effect of GN on MDA and antioxidant enzymes in kidney tissue

Malondialdehyde levels were significantly increased in kidney tissues (p < 0.05), and antioxidant enzyme (SOD, CAT and GSH-Px) levels were alleviated in the LPS-induced septic rats compared to the controls (Figure 4A–D). The GN+LPS-treated rats had significantly reduced (p < 0.05) MDA levels and enhanced antioxidant enzymes in comparison to the LPS alone-treated rats. The GN alone-treated rats displayed similar results as controls.

Effect of GN on MDA and antioxidant enzymes in lung tissue

Malondialdehyde levels in lung tissues were significantly increased (p < 0.05), and antioxidant enzyme (SOD, CAT and GSH-Px) levels were reduced in the LPS-induced septic rats in contrast to the control rats (Figure 5A–D). The GN+LPS-treated rats had significantly reduced (p < 0.05) MDA levels and augmented antioxidant enzymes as compared to the LPS alone-treated rats. The GN alone-treated rats presented similar results as controls.

Effect of GN on histopathological analysis of liver, kidney and lung tissues

Figure 6A–C exhibit the histopathological examination of the liver, kidneys and lungs in control and experimental rats. Histopathological damages and lesions were absent in the hepatic, kidney and lung tissues of control and GN alone-treated rats. Lipopolysaccharide caused severe inflammation and damage to hepatic tissues, as well as inter-alveolar septum condensing, hyperemia, and severe inflammation in the peri-bronchiolar and peri-vascular regions of the lungs. Moreover, it induced modest assembly of the hyaline cylinder in the lumen of renal tubules, mild relapse of tubular epithelium, and serious interstitial vessel hyperemia in renal tissues. The GN-treated septic rats demonstrated mild renal tubule lumens and extinct deterioration in the tubular hyperemia in comparison to the LPS-prompted septic rats. Only mild inflammation of hepatic tissue was present in the GN-supplemented septic rats. The GN group presented with condensed interstitial thickening and inflammation in the lungs in contrast to the LPS-stimulated sepsis animals.

GN alleviates mRNA expression of inflammatory mediators in lung tissues of LPS-induced septic rats

To assess whether GN (50 mg/kg BW) mitigated inflammation in lung tissues of septic rats, the HMGβ1, NF-κB, NLRP3, TNF-α, and IL-1β mRNA levels were evaluated (Figure 7A–E). The levels of HMGβ1, NF-κB, NLRP3, TNF-α, and IL-1β mRNA were significantly enhanced (p < 0.05) in the LPS-induced septic rats as compared to the control group. The administration of GN significantly attenuated (p < 0.05) these inflammatory mediators in contrast to the LPS-prompted septic rats (Figure 7).

GN attenuates the protein expression of IRAK-1, TRAF-6, MYD88, and Iκβα in hepatic tissues of LPS-induced septic rats

In the western blot analysis, we found that the protein levels of IRAK-1, TRAF-6 and MYD88 were augmented, whereas Iκβα levels declined in the hepatic tissues of LPS-prompted sepsis animals (Figure 8A–E). It was observed that GN reduced IRAK-1, TRAF-6 and MyD88 levels, and enhanced Iκβα protein levels in hepatic tissues. The stimulation of NF-κB is regulated by Iκβα proteins, and they inhibit NF-κB triggering. The Iκβα expression was suppressed in LPS-induced septic rats. Gedunin inhibited the degradation of Iκβα.

Discussion

Septic shock is one of the stages of SIRS, which subsequently causes multiple organ failure. An endotoxin, LPS, is a powerful stimulator that activates macrophages or monocytes in order to produce assorted pro-inflammatory cytokines.1, 2 The LPS-prompted septic rat model behaves like a human disease.13, 14 Sepsis causes uneven immune reactions, oxidative stress and mitochondrial disorders.11, 12 Meanwhile, an immune reaction in sepsis is an exceptionally complex single antimicrobial remedy that appears to be enough to increase survival. Antioxidants play a defensive role in sepsis-associated inflammation and oxidative stress.13, 19 The efficacy of medications in sepsis treatment via LPS-triggered cytokines and stimulated signals has been reported.13, 14, 33, 34 Thus, we aimed to evaluate the anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of GN on an LPS-induced rat model. Gedunin significantly reduced cytokines, chemokines and pro-inflammatory mediators, and enhanced the antioxidant activities in our LPS-prompted septic rat model. Numerous studies have previously proposed that GN exerts anti-inflammatory and antioxidant activities in lung inflammation, acute articular inflammation and LPS-induced inflammation models.30, 33, 34

The generation of increased free radicals leads to oxidative damage. Extreme oxidative stress is a unique feature of LPS. Sustained vascular inflammation and oxidative stress due to LPS stimulation are distinctive features in sepsis.18 The antioxidant resistance is due to a variety of antioxidants: CAT, SOD and GSH-Px. Our study shows that LPS modifies the antioxidant enzymes and thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS), and GN treatment prevents oxidative stress. Increased TBARS formation and reduced antioxidant levels confirm LPS-induced lipid peroxidation. Gedunin treatment inhibited this peroxidation. This result is in agreement with previous studies which reported that GN, neem leaf and bark extract reversed elevated MDA levels and enhanced the antioxidant status.36, 37 Hence, GN could reduce oxidative stress and exert protection against free radicals generated by LPS-induced sepsis in rat models.

Numerous studies have indicated that inflammatory cytokines, particularly TNF-α, play a vital role in LPS-prompted sepsis and endotoxin shock.16 Tumor necrosis factor alpha, a pleiotropic cytokine, is responsible for multiple physiological functions and is released by various immune cells due to LPS triggers.38 The ELISA tests identified LPS serum cytokines in rats. Lipopolysaccharide enhanced the levels of inflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-10, IL-1β, and IL-6) and GN reduced them. These results establish that GN can constrain the secretion of inflammatory cytokines and block inflammatory reactions. Previous reports have also suggested that GN reduces inflammatory cytokines and inflammatory mediators in experimental animals.33, 34 The HMGβ1 functions as an extracellular signal molecule and has a role at the molecular level in inflammation, cell diversity, relocation, and metastasis.39 In an earlier study, an increase in HMGβ1 led to a subsequent increase in TNF-α, which resulted in the release of IL-6, reflecting co-activation between early inflammatory cytokines and HMGβ1.40 The HMGβ1 acts as a controller or modulator in the organ responses to sepsis. In the current trial, HMGβ1 was significantly augmented in the LPS-induced septic rats, and significantly reduced in the GN-treated animals. Thus, GN prevents the inflammatory reaction of sepsis in the lungs by attenuating HMGβ1 and thus protects against lung damage. To the best of our knowledge, the action of GN on HMGβ1 has not been previously explored. Our study is the first one to reveal the impact of GN on HMGβ1.

Recently, it has been discovered that HMGβ1 amplifies TLR-facilitated activation of NF-κB.41 Nuclear factor kappa B plays a crucial role in controlling the gene transcription of pro-inflammatory cytokines.42 Preceding trials have explored the pathways of NF-κB stimulation and signal transduction in the pathophysiology of sepsis. The NF-κB, a transcription element, prompts an upsurge of cytokines (IL-6 and TNF-α) to initiate inflammation and apoptosis.43, 44 The multi-protein signaling complexes, such as inflammasomes, promote the stimulation of caspases and IL-1β. The NLRP3 is a renowned inflammasome that is associated with autoimmune disorders. It is also a key target for anti-inflammatory treatments.45 Control of HMGB1 improves inflammation and sepsis-promoted lung damage by restraining NLRP3 through the NF-κB pathways.46 Our findings demonstrate that GN causes anti-inflammatory action in septic lungs by subduing NF-κB activation, which results in reduced levels of HMGβ1, NLRP3 and pro-inflammatory cytokines. Thus, due to its anti-inflammatory and anti­oxidant properties, GN protects against lung impairment.

Sepsis causes hyper-expression of inflammatory moderator systems to produce cytokines. The NF-κB stimulation is key to those principal systems.47 The suppression of NF-κB reduces acute inflammatory changes and organ impairment in sepsis. In the current research, we proposed that GN could mitigate hepatic phosphorylated NF-κBp65. Earlier reports found that MRP-8 openly interrelates with TLR-4/MD-2 and persuades NF-κB stimulation.48 The MRP8 promotes MyD88 intracellular translocation and the initiation of IRAK-1 and NF-κB that subsequently upregulates TNF-α expression.48 Our study documents that GN diminishes MyD88, IRAK-1 and NF-κBp65 adaptor protein expressions. Hence, the protective effect of GN could be mediated by the suppression of other inflammatory molecules involved in the NF-κB pathway. Nevertheless, further investigations over a longer period of time should assess if there are any side effects associated with GN treatment before human use.

Limitations

The current study showed that GN significantly reduced cytokines, chemokines and pro-inflammatory mediators, and enhanced the antioxidant activities in the LPS-prompted septic rat model. However, one should note that except for IL-6, none has found its way from bench to bedside. Interestingly, GN is the promising candidate to control the sepsis, but further clinical research is needed.

Conclusions

In summary, this study demonstrates for the first time that GN could mitigate ROS in organs (liver, kidneys and lungs), and it could reduce pro-cytokines, lessen hepatic toxicity, reduce tissue damage, and enhance antioxidant activity in the LPS-induced septic rat model. We also discovered that GN treatment alleviated the MyD88, IRAK-1, TRAF-6, and NF-κB protein levels and subdued Iκβα degradation in the LPS-induced septic rat model through its anti-inflammatory effects. While these results may be due to the powerful antioxidant properties of GN, they may also be caused by the repression of the intensified inflammation cascade. This suppression prevents serious impairment by attenuating HMGβ1, NF-κB and NLRP3 levels and averts a cytokine storm. Our findings imply that GN is a potential remedy for sepsis due to its anti-inflammatory and antioxidant properties. Further research is required to confirm the antiseptic activity of GN on various signaling pathways in an in vivo model.

Supplementary data

The supplementary materials are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8297655. The package contains the following files:

Supplementary Table 1. Results of normality test as presented in Figure 1.

Supplementary Table 2. Results of normality test as presented in Figure 2.

Supplementary Table 3. Results of normality test as presented in Figure 3.

Supplementary Table 4. Results of normality test as presented in Figure 4.

Supplementary Table 5. Results of normality test as presented in Figure 5.

Supplementary Table 6. Results of normality test as presented in Figure 7.

Supplementary Table 7. Results of normality test as presented in Figure 8.

Supplementary Fig. 1. Results of the Kruskal–Wallis test as presented in Figure 1.

Supplementary Fig. 2. Results of the Kruskal–Wallis test as presented in Figure 2.

Supplementary Fig. 3. Results of the Kruskal–Wallis test as presented in Figure 3.

Supplementary Fig. 4. Results of the Kruskal–Wallis test as presented in Figure 4.

Supplementary Fig. 5. Results of the Kruskal–Wallis test as presented in Figure 5.

Supplementary Fig. 6. Results of the Kruskal–Wallis test as presented in Figure 7.

Supplementary Fig. 7. Results of the Kruskal–Wallis test as presented in Figure 8.

Tables


Table 1. Primer list

Gene

Primer sequences

HMGB1

F: 5’-TTGTGCAAACTTGCCGGGAGGA-3’
R: 5’-ACTTCTCCTTCAGCTTGGCAGC-3’

NLRP3

F: 5’-GGAGGAGGAGGAAGAGGAGATA-3’
R: 5’-AGGACTGAGAAGATGCCACTAC-3’

NF-κB

F: 5’-GATCACACAGGCCGGACAAT-3’
R: 5’-CTCGGCTACACTCAGATCG-3’;

IL-1β

F: 5’-CCTGTGTGATGAAAGACGGC-3’
R: 5’-TATGTCCCGACCATTGCTGT-3’

TNF-α

F: 5’- AGCCCACGTCGTAGCAAACCACCAA-3’,
R: 5’-AACACCCATT CCCTTCAC-AGAGCAAT-3’

β-actin

F: 5’-CCACCATGTACCCAGGCATT-3’
R: 5’-AGGGTGTAAAACGCAGCTCA-3’

Table 2. Comparison of the study groups

Variables

Group 1 (control) (n = 6)

Group 2 (n = 6)

Group 3 (n = 6)

Group 4 (n = 6)

p-value*

AST_Serum

108.26 (98.47–117.95)

204.4 (185.91–222.69)

140.47 (127.76–153.04)

109.15 (99.28–118.92)

<0.001

ALT_Serum

58.38 (53.10–63.60)

96.85 (88.09–105.51)

70.96 (64.55–77.31)

59.04 (53.70–64.32)

<0.001

IL-1β_Serum

255.23 (232–278)

597 (543–650)

418 (380–455)

262 (238–285)

<0.001

IL-10_Serum

105 (95–114)

243 (221–264)

160 (145–174)

102 (93–111)

<0.001

TNF-α_Serum

50 (45–54)

310 (282–338)

171 (155–1.86)

55 (50–59)

<0.001

IL-6_Serum

1570 (1428–1711)

3682 (3348–4011)

2521 (2293–2747)

1555 (1415–1695)

<0.001

MDA_Liver

0.51 (0.41–0.56)

0.77 (0.70–0.84)

0.54 (0.49–0.59)

0.47 (0.43–0.51)

0.001

SOD_Liver

0.19 (0.17–0.21)

0.09 (0.08–0.1)

0.16 (0.15–0.17)

0.18 (0.16–0.20)

<0.001

GSH-Px_Liver

95 (86–103)

52 (47–56)

72 (65–78)

95 (86–1.03)

<0.001

CAT_Liver

1.2 (1.09–1.31)

0.93 (0.85–1.01)

1.07 (0.97–1.17)

1.19 (1.08–1.30)

0.001

MDA_Kidney

0.60 (0.55–0.65)

0.75 (0.68–0.82)

0.62 (0.56–0.68)

0.52 (0.47–0.57)

0.001

SOD_Kidney

0.19 (0.17–0.21)

0.11 (0.10–0.12)

0.15 (0.14–0.16)

0.18 (0.16–0.20)

<0.001

GSH-Px_Kidney

87 (79–95)

56 (51–61)

80 (73–87)

85 (77–92)

0.002

CAT_Kidney

0.56 (0.51–0.61)

0.32 (0.29–0.35)

0.52 (0.47–0.57)

0.55 (0.50–0.60)

0.003

MDA_Lung

0.73 (0.66–0.80)

1.19 (1.08–1.30)

0.87 (0.79–0.95)

0.71 (0.65–0.77)

<0.001

SOD_Lung

0.17 (0.15–0.19)

0.08 (0.07–0.09)

0.13 (0.12–0.14)

0.16 (0.15–0.17)

<0.001

GSH-Px_Lung

57 (52–62)

25 (23–27)

42 (39–46)

56 (51–61)

<0.001

CAT_Lung

0.70 (0.64–0.76)

0.28 (0.25–0.31)

0.48 (0.44–0.52)

0.69 (0.63–0.75)

<0.001

HMGβ1_Lung

1 (0.91–1.09)

3.6 (3.28–3.92)

2.59 (2.36–2.82)

1.48 (1.35–1.61)

<0.001

NLRP3_Lung

1 (0.91–1.09)

7.21 (6.56–7.86)

4.14 (3.77–4.51)

1.75 (1.59–1.91)

<0.001

NF-κB_Lung

1 (0.91–1.09)

6.43 (5.85–7.01)

3.50 (3.19–3.82)

2.37 (2.16–2.58)

<0.001

IL-1β_Lung

1 (0.91–1.09)

8.90 (8.10–9.70)

3.86 (3.51–4.21)

1.95 (1.77–2.13)

<0.001

TNF-α_Lung

1 (0.91–1.09)

1.20 (1.09–1.31)

1.01 (0.92–1.10)

0.95 (0.86–1.04)

0.005

IRAK-1_Lung

1 (0.91–1.09)

1.64 (1.49–1.79)

1.29 (1.17–1.41)

0.95 (0.86–1.04)

<0.001

TRAF6_Lung

1 (0.91–1.09)

1.53 (1.39–1.67)

1.22 (1.11–1.33)

1.08 (0.98–1.1۸)

<0.001

Iκβα_Lung

1 (0.91–1.09)

0.28 (0.25–0.31)

0.60 (0.55–0.65)

0.95 (0.86–1.04)

<0.001

MyD88_Lung

1 (0.91–1.09)

1.16 (1.06–1.26)

1 (0.91–1.09)

0.82 (0.75–0.89)

0.001

AST – aspartate aminotransferase; ALT – alanine transaminase; IL – interleukin, TNF-a – tumor necrosis factor alpha; MDA – malondialdehyde; SOD – superoxide dismutase; GSH-Px – glutathione peroxidase; CAT – catalase; NLRP3 – NOD-like receptor protein 3; HMGβ1 – high mobility group box protein 1; NF-κB – nuclear factor kappa B; *p-value was generated from Kruskal–Wallis test. Data were presented as median (Q1 and Q3). There was a significant difference among all groups in Dunn’s test.

Figures


Fig. 1. Gedunin (GN) alleviates hepatic toxicity marker enzymes. Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (A) and alanine transaminase (ALT) (B) in the serum of a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced septic rat model. The data were generated from the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc tests
group I – the control group; group II – LPS-treated rats; group III – LPS+GN-treated rats; group IV – GN alone-treated rats; #p < 0.01 compared to group II; *p < 0.05 compared to group III.
Fig. 2. Gedunin (GN) lessens pro-inflammatory cytokines. Interleukin-1 beta (IL-1β) (A), interleukin-10 (IL-10) (B), tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) (C), and interleukin-6 (IL-6) (D) levels in the serum of the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-prompted septic rat model. The data were generated from the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc tests
group I – the control group; group II – LPS-treated rats; group III – LPS+GN-treated rats; group IV – GN alone-treated rats; #p < 0.01 compared to group II; *p < 0.05 compared to group III.
Fig. 3. Influence of gedunin (GN) on malondialdehyde (MDA) (A), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (B), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) (C), and catalase (CAT) (D) activity in hepatic tissues in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced septic rat model. The data were generated from the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc tests
group I – the control group; group II – LPS-treated rats; group III – LPS+GN-treated rats; group IV – GN alone-treated rats; #p < 0.01 compared to group II; *p < 0.05 compared to group III.
Fig. 4. Influence of gedunin (GN) on malondialdehyde (MDA) (A), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (B), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) (C), and catalase (CAT) (D) activity in kidney tissues in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced septic rat model. The data were generated from the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc tests
group I – the control group; group II – LPS-treated rats; group III – LPS+GN-treated rats; group IV – GN alone-treated rats; #p < 0.01 compared to group II; *p < 0.05 compared to group III.
Fig. 5. Influence of gedunin (GN) on malondialdehyde (MDA) (A), superoxide dismutase (SOD) (B), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) (C), and catalase (CAT) (D) activity in lung tissues in a lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced septic rat model. The data were generated from the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc tests
group I – the control group; group II – LPS-treated rats; group III – LPS+GN-treated rats; group IV – GN alone-treated rats; #p < 0.01 compared to group II; *p < 0.05 compared to group III.
Fig. 6. A. Effect of gedunin (GN) on the histopathology of hepatic tissues in the lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-induced septic rat model. Control rats revealed normal histology of hepatic tissues. The hepatic tissues of LPS-induced septic rats displayed severe inflammation and hepatic impairments. The LPS+GN-treated rats exhibited only mild inflammation of liver tissues. Normal liver histology was detected in the GN-alone treated group (stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), magnification (×40), scale bar = 50 μm); B. Effect of GN on the histopathology of kidney tissues in the LPS-prompted septic rat model. Control rats represented normal histology of kidney tissues. The LPS-induced renal tissue revealed a modest gathering of hyaline cylinders in the lumen, minor relapses of tubular epithelium, and serious interstitial vessel hyperemia. The LPS+GN-treated septic rats had mild renal tubule lumens and extinct degeneration in the tubular hyperemia. Normal renal histology can be viewed in the GN alone-treated group (stained with H&E, magnification (×40), scale bar = 50 μm); C. Influence of GN on the histopathology of lung tissues in the LPS-prompted septic rat model. Control rats showed normal histology of lung tissues. The LPS-induced lung tissue represents interalveolar septum condensing, hyperemia, severe inflammation in the peri-bronchiolar and peri-vascular region, and moderate inflammation of the interalveolar septum. The lung tissues of the LPS+GN-treated rats revealed condensed interstitial thickening and inflammation, noticing only mild inflammation. Normal lung histology can be viewed in the GN alone-treated group (stained with H&E, magnification (×40), scale bar = 50 μm)
group I – the control group; group II – LPS-treated rats; group III – LPS+GN-treated rats; group IV – GN alone-treated rats.
Fig. 7. Influence of gedunin (GN) on mRNA levels in lung tissues in the LPS-prompted septic rat model. The mRNA expression levels of high-mobility group box 1 (HMGβ1) (A), nucleotide-binding domain (NOD)-like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3) (B), nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) (C), interleukin-1β (IL-1β) (D), and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) (E) were measured using real-time quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). The data were generated from the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc tests
group I – the control group; group II – LPS-treated rats; group III – LPS+GN-treated rats; group IV – GN alone-treated rats; #p < 0.01 compared to group II; *p < 0.05 compared to group III.
Fig. 8. A. This representative photograph shows the comparative protein expression in western blots. The band intensities were quantified by densitometry and normalized to the respective β-actin loading controls. Related protein expression of interleukin-1 receptor-associated kinase 1 (IRAK-1) (B), tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 6 (TRAF-6) (C), inhibitory protein κΒα (Iκβα) (D), and myeloid differentiation primary response 88 (MyD88) (E) were assessed with western blots. The data were generated from the nonparametric Kruskal–Wallis and Dunn’s post-hoc tests
group I – the control group; group II – LPS-treated rats; group III – LPS+GN-treated rats; group IV – GN alone-treated rats; #p < 0.01 compared to group II; *p < 0.05 compared to group III.

References (48)

  1. Xu J, Lu C, Liu Z, Zhang P, Guo H, Wang T. Schizandrin B protects LPS-induced sepsis via TLR4/NF-κB/MyD88 signaling pathway. Am J Transl Res. 2018;10(4):1155–1163. PMID:29736208.
  2. Alamili M, Bendtzen K, Lykkesfeldt J, Rosenberg J, Gögenur I. Effect of melatonin on human nighttime endotoxaemia: Randomized, double-blinded, cross-over study. In Vivo. 2014;28(6):1057–1063. PMID:25398799.
  3. Schrier RW, Wang W. Acute renal failure and sepsis. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(2):159–169. doi:10.1056/NEJMra032401
  4. Thimmulappa RK. Nrf2 is a critical regulator of the innate immune response and survival during experimental sepsis. J Clin Invest. 2006;116(4):984–995. doi:10.1172/JCI25790
  5. Kolac UK, Ustuner MC, Tekin N, Ustuner D, Colak E, Entok E. The anti-inflammatory and antioxidant effects of Salvia officinalis on lipopolysaccharide-induced inflammation in rats. J Med Food. 2017;20(12):1193–1200. doi:10.1089/jmf.2017.0035
  6. Epstein FH, Parrillo JE. Pathogenetic mechanisms of septic shock. N Engl J Med. 1993;328(20):1471–1477. doi:10.1056/NEJM199305203282008
  7. Opal SM. Endotoxins and other sepsis triggers. Contrib Nephrol. 2010;167:14–24. doi:10.1159/000315915
  8. Doi K. Role of kidney injury in sepsis. J Intensive Care. 2016;4(1):17. doi:10.1186/s40560-016-0146-3
  9. Kellum JA, Lameire N, for the KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: A KDIGO summary (part 1). Crit Care. 2013;17(1):204. doi:10.1186/cc11454
  10. Gomez H, Ince C, De Backer D, et al. A unified theory of sepsis-induced acute kidney injury: Inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, bioenergetics, and the tubular cell adaptation to injury. Shock. 2014;41(1):3–11. doi:10.1097/SHK.0000000000000052
  11. Alberti C, Brun-Buisson C, Burchardi H, et al. Epidemiology of sepsis and infection in ICU patients from an international multicentre cohort study. Intensive Care Med. 2002;28(2):108–121. doi:10.1007/s00134-001-1143-z
  12. Ozdulger A, Cinel I, Koksel O, et al. The protective effect of N-acetylcysteine on apoptotic lung injury in cecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis model. Shock. 2003;19(4):366–372. doi:10.1097/00024382-200304000-00012
  13. Cadirci E, Ugan RA, Dincer B, et al. Urotensin receptors as a new target for CLP induced septic lung injury in mice. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2019;392(2):135–145. doi:10.1007/s00210-018-1571-8
  14. Caroff M, Karibian D. Structure of bacterial lipopolysaccharides. Carbohydr Res. 2003;338(23):2431–2447. doi:10.1016/j.carres.2003.07.010
  15. Entok E, Ustuner MC, Ozbayer C, et al. Anti-inflammatuar and anti-oxidative effects of Nigella sativa L.: 18FDG-PET imaging of inflammation. Mol Biol Rep. 2014;41(5):2827–2834. doi:10.1007/s11033-014-3137-2
  16. Schulte W, Bernhagen J, Bucala R. Cytokines in sepsis: Potent immunoregulators and potential therapeutic targets. An updated view. Mediators Inflamm. 2013;2013:165974. doi:10.1155/2013/165974
  17. Halliwell B, Gutteridge JMC. Oxygen toxicity, oxygen radicals, transition metals and disease. Biochem J. 1984;219(1):1–14. doi:10.1042/bj2190001
  18. Steven S, Dib M, Roohani S, Kashani F, Münzel T, Daiber A. Time response of oxidative/nitrosative stress and inflammation in LPS-induced endotoxaemia: A comparative study of mice and rats. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(10):2176. doi:10.3390/ijms18102176
  19. Devasagayam TPA, Tilak JC, Boloor KK, Sane KS, Ghaskadbi SS, Lele RD. Free radicals and antioxidants in human health: Current status and future prospects. J Assoc Physicians India. 2004;52:794–804. PMID:15909857.
  20. Lan KC, Chao SC, Wu HY, et al. Salidroside ameliorates sepsis-induced acute lung injury and mortality via downregulating NF-κB and HMGB1 pathways through the upregulation of SIRT1. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):12026. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-12285-8
  21. Wang H, Ward MF, Sama AE. Targeting HMGB1 in the treatment of sepsis. Exp Opin Ther Targets. 2014;18(3):257–268. doi:10.1517/14728222.2014.863876
  22. Wang H, Bloom O, Zhang M, et al. HMG-1 as a late mediator of endotoxin lethality in mice. Science. 1999;285(5425):248–251. doi:10.1126/science.285.5425.248
  23. Martinon F, Burns K, Tschopp J. The inflammasome. Mol Cell. 2002;10(2):417–426. doi:10.1016/S1097-2765(02)00599-3
  24. Keller M, Rüegg A, Werner S, Beer HD. Active caspase-1 is a regulator of unconventional protein secretion. Cell. 2008;132(5):818–831. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2007.12.040
  25. Hou L, Yang Z, Wang Z, et al. NLRP3/ASC-mediated alveolar macrophage pyroptosis enhances HMGB1 secretion in acute lung injury induced by cardiopulmonary bypass. Lab Invest. 2018;98(8):1052–1064. doi:10.1038/s41374-018-0073-0
  26. Isik A, Soran A, Grasi A, Barry N, Sezgin E. Lymphedema after sentinel lymph node biopsy: Who is at risk? Lymph Res Biol. 2022;20(2):160–163. doi:10.1089/lrb.2020.0093
  27. Brandt GEL, Schmidt MD, Prisinzano TE, Blagg BSJ. Gedunin, a novel Hsp90 inhibitor: Semisynthesis of derivatives and preliminary structure−activity relationships. J Med Chem. 2008;51(20):6495–6502. doi:10.1021/jm8007486
  28. Wax S, Piecyk M, Maritim B, Anderson P. Geldanamycin inhibits the production of inflammatory cytokines in activated macrophages by reducing the stability and translation of cytokine transcripts. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(2):541–550. doi:10.1002/art.10780
  29. Madrigal-Matute J, López-Franco O, Blanco-Colio LM, et al. Heat shock protein 90 inhibitors attenuate inflammatory responses in atherosclerosis. Cardiovasc Res. 2010;86(2):330–337. doi:10.1093/cvr/cvq046
  30. Ferraris FK, Moret KH, Figueiredo ABC, Penido C, Henriques MDGMO. Gedunin, a natural tetranortriterpenoid, modulates T lymphocyte responses and ameliorates allergic inflammation. Int Immunopharmacol. 2012;14(1):82–93. doi:10.1016/j.intimp.2012.06.002
  31. Uddin SJ, Nahar L, Shilpi JA, et al. Gedunin, a limonoid from Xylocarpus granatum, inhibits the growth of CaCo-2 colon cancer cell line in vitro. Phytother Res. 2007;21(8):757–761. doi:10.1002/ptr.2159
  32. Kamath SG, Chen N, Xiong Y, et al. Gedunin, a novel natural substance, inhibits ovarian cancer cell proliferation. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2009;19(9):1564–1569. doi:10.1111/IGC.0b013e3181a83135
  33. Conte F, Ferraris F, Costa T, et al. Effect of gedunin on acute articular inflammation and hypernociception in mice. Molecules. 2015;20(2):2636–2657. doi:10.3390/molecules20022636
  34. Borges PV, Moret KH, Maya-Monteiro CM, et al. Gedunin binds to myeloid differentiation protein 2 and impairs lipopolysaccharide-induced Toll-like receptor 4 signaling in macrophages. Mol Pharmacol. 2015;88(5):949–961. doi:10.1124/mol.115.098970
  35. Koc F, Tekeli MY, Kanbur M, Karayigit MÖ, Liman BC. The effects of chrysin on lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis in rats. J Food Biochem. 2020;44(9). doi:10.1111/jfbc.13359
  36. Basir S, Shailey S. Strengthening of antioxidant defense by Azadirachta indica in alloxan-diabetic rat tissues. J Ayurveda Integr Med. 2012;3(3):130. doi:10.4103/0975-9476.100174
  37. Mazumdar S, Marar T, Devarajan S, Patki J. Functional relevance of gedunin as a bona fide ligand of NADPH oxidase 5 and ROS scavenger: An in silico and in vitro assessment in a hyperglycemic RBC model. Biochem Biophys Rep. 2021;25:100904. doi:10.1016/j.bbrep.2020.100904
  38. Goetz F. Tumor necrosis factors. Dev Comp Immunol. 2004;28(5):487–497. doi:10.1016/j.dci.2003.09.008
  39. Muller S. The double life of HMGB1 chromatin protein: Architectural factor and extracellular signal. EMBO J. 2001;20(16):4337–4340. doi:10.1093/emboj/20.16.4337
  40. Sun J, Shi S, Wang Q, Yu K, Wang R. Continuous hemodiafiltration therapy reduces damage of multi-organs by ameliorating of HMGB1/TLR4/NFκB in a dog sepsis model. Int J Clin Exp Pathol. 2015;8(2):1555–1564. PMID:25973040.
  41. McCauley MJ, Rueter EM, Rouzina I, Maher LJ, Williams MC. Single-molecule kinetics reveal microscopic mechanism by which high-mobility group B proteins alter DNA flexibility. Nucl Acids Res. 2013;41(1):167–181. doi:10.1093/nar/gks1031
  42. Tergaonkar V. NFκB pathway: A good signaling paradigm and therapeutic target. Int J Biochem Cell Biol. 2006;38(10):1647–1653. doi:10.1016/j.biocel.2006.03.023
  43. Ha T, Xia Y, Liu X, et al. Glucan phosphate attenuates myocardial HMGB1 translocation in severe sepsis through inhibiting NF-κB activation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2011;301(3):H848–H855. doi:10.1152/ajpheart.01007.2010
  44. Kaplan KA, Odabasoglu F, Halici Z, et al. Alpha-lipoic acid protects against indomethacin-induced gastric oxidative toxicity by modulating antioxidant system. J Food Sci. 2012;77(11):H224–H230. doi:10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02920.x
  45. Jo EK, Kim JK, Shin DM, Sasakawa C. Molecular mechanisms regulating NLRP3 inflammasome activation. Cell Mol Immunol. 2016;13(2):148–159. doi:10.1038/cmi.2015.95
  46. Yu R, Jiang S, Tao Y, Li P, Yin J, Zhou Q. Inhibition of HMGB1 improves necrotizing enterocolitis by inhibiting NLRP3 via TLR4 and NF-κB signaling pathways. J Cell Physiol. 2019;234(8):13431–13438. doi:10.1002/jcp.28022
  47. Liu SF, Malik AB. NF-κB activation as a pathological mechanism of septic shock and inflammation. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2006;290(4):L622–L645. doi:10.1152/ajplung.00477.2005
  48. Vogl T, Tenbrock K, Ludwig S, et al. Mrp8 and Mrp14 are endogenous activators of Toll-like receptor 4, promoting lethal, endotoxin-induced shock. Nat Med. 2007;13(9):1042–1049. doi:10.1038/nm1638