Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
5-Year IF – 2.0, IF – 1.9, JCI (2024) – 0.43
Scopus CiteScore – 4.3
Q1 in SJR 2024, SJR score – 0.598, H-index: 49 (SJR)
ICV – 161.00; MNiSW – 70 pts
Initial editorial assessment and first decision within 24 h

ISSN 1899–5276 (print), ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2019, vol. 28, nr 10, October, p. 1367–1375

doi: 10.17219/acem/109343

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Pupil autoregulation impairment as an early marker of glaucomatous damage

Marta Anna Szmigiel1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Joanna Wiktoria Przeździecka-Dołyk1,2,A,B,C,D,E,F, Jacek Olszewski1,C,E,F, Henryk Kasprzak1,A,C,D,E,F

1 Department of Optics and Photonics, Faculty of Fundamental Problems of Technology, Wroclaw University of Science and Technology, Poland

2 Department and Clinic of Ophthalmology, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland

Abstract

Background. Glaucoma, a degenerative and progressive disease, leads to structural and functional changes in the optic nerve head and retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), while the vasculature of the iris stays intact.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine whether the coherence level associated with pupil geometry and peripheral arterial pulsation can be the basis for differentiating glaucoma and glaucoma-suspected patients from a control group.
Material and Methods. This is an investigator-initiated, single-center prospective cohort study. Patients with diagnosed glaucoma (glaucoma group – GG) or glaucoma suspects (glaucoma suspects group – GSG), as well as healthy participants (control group – CG), were prospectively enrolled in the study. Glaucoma-diagnosed patients and glaucoma suspects who converted to glaucoma within 5 years were included. All patients underwent a full ophthalmological examination that included measurements of the thicknesses of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) and the ganglion cell complex (GCC) along with other parameters. A custom-made pupilometer was synchronized with a pulsometer to simultaneously record an image of the pupil and the peripheral arterial pulsation signal. All readings were processed with a script developed by the researchers. The main indicator of an increased influence of the vascular structures of the iris on pupil geometry in the patients and CG were the coherence levels (levC) between parameters describing the pupillary shape and peripheral arterial pulsation.
Results. Differences in the median value of the levCpS, levCpε and levCpθ parameters between the GG and GSG compared to the CG were found (p < 0.001). During the follow-up period, a larger decrease was observed in RNFL thickness and GCC thickness in the GSG than in the GG (p < 0.05). Strong correlations were found between levCpS and RNFL and GCC loss among the GSG group (p < 0.001), while in the GG this parameter correlated with RNFL and GCC thickness (p < 0.001).
Conclusion. This is the first attempt to relate changes in the neuronal signaling pathways in glaucoma to the vascular-dependent changes of pupil geometry. The findings presented herein suggest that this approach can be used to determine which glaucoma suspects have autonomic system impairment in the eye, increasing their probability of glaucoma conversion.

Key words

glaucoma, retinal nerve fiber layer, pupil, ganglion cell complex, peripheral arterial pulsation

References (28)

  1. Parihar JKS. Glaucoma: The ‘black hole’ of irreversible blindness. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016;72(1):3–4.
  2. World Health Organization. Vision impairment and blindness. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/blindness-and-visual-impairment. Accessed February 23, 2019.
  3. Gracitelli CPB, Duque-Chica GL, Moura AL, et al. Relationship between daytime sleepiness and intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells in glaucomatous disease. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:5317371.
  4. Kuze M, Morita T, Fukuda Y, Kondo M, Tsubota K, Ayaki M. Electrophysiological responses from intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells are diminished in glaucoma patients. J Optom. 2017;10(4):226–232.
  5. Gracitelli CPB, Duque-Chica GL, Moura AL, et al. A positive association between intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells and retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in glaucoma. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2014;55(12):7997–8005.
  6. Hattar S, Liao HW, Takao M, Berson DM, Yau KW. Melanopsin-containing retinal ganglion cells: Architecture, projections, and intrinsic photosensitivity. Science. 2002;295(5557):1065–1070.
  7. Berson DM, Dunn FA, Takao M. Phototransduction by retinal ganglion cells that set the circadian clock. Science. 2002;295(5557):1070–1073.
  8. Rukmini AV, Milea D, Baskaran M, et al. Pupillary responses to high-irradiance blue light correlate with glaucoma severity. Ophthalmology. 2015;122(9):1777–1785.
  9. El-Danaf RN, Huberman AD. Characteristic patterns of dendritic remodeling in early-stage glaucoma: Evidence from genetically identified retinal ganglion cell types. J Neurosci. 2015;35(6):2329–2343.
  10. Kelbsch C, Maeda F, Strasser T, et al. Pupillary responses driven by ipRGCs and classical photoreceptors are impaired in glaucoma. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016;254(7):1361–1370.
  11. Kankipati L, Girkin CA, Gamlin PD. The post-illumination pupil response is reduced in glaucoma patients. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011;52(5):2287–2292.
  12. Wyatt HJ. The form of the human pupil. Vision Res. 1995;35(14):2021–2036.
  13. Nowak W, Hachoł A, Kasprzak H. Time-frequency analysis of spontaneous fluctuation of the pupil size of the human eye. Optica Applicata. 2008;38(2):469–480.
  14. Gooley JJ, Ho Mien I, St Hilaire MA, et al. Melanopsin and rod-cone photoreceptors play different roles in mediating pupillary light responses during exposure to continuous light in humans. J Neurosci. 2012;32(41):14242–14253.
  15. Winn B, Whitaker D, Elliott DB, Phillips NJ. Factors affecting light-adapted pupil size in normal human subjects. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1994;35(3):1132–1137.
  16. Yoshida H, Mizuta H, Gouhara T, Suzuki Y, Yana K, Okuyama F. Statistical properties of simultaneously recorded fluctuations in pupil diameter and heart rate. Proceedings of 17th International Conference of the Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (IEEE 1995), Montreal, Canada:165–166.
  17. Yoshida, H, Yana K, Okuyama F, Tokoro T. Time-varying properties of respiratory fluctuations in pupil diameter of human eyes. Methods Inf Med. 1994;33(1):46–48.
  18. Al Abdi RM, Alhitary AE, Abdul Hay EW, Al-Bashir AK. Objective detection of chronic stress using physiological parameters. Med Biol Eng Comput. 2018;56(12):2273–2286.
  19. Szmigiel M, Kasprzak H. Distribution of parameters of elliptic approximation of the human pupil. Optica Aplicata. 2015;45(1):41–50.
  20. Welch P. The use of fast Fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics. 1967;15(2):70–73.
  21. Szmigiel MA, Kasprzak H, Klysik A. Dependences between kinetics of the human eye pupil and blood pulsation. In: Applications of Digital Image Processing XXXIX, International Society for Optics and Photonics, August 29 – September 1, 2016, San Diego, USA, art. 99712V, s. 1–9; SPIE Proceedings Series, vol. 9971.
  22. Gordon MO, Beiser JA, Brandt JD, et al. The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: Baseline factors that predict the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. Arch Ophthalmol. 2002;120(6):714–720.
  23. Calcagini G, Censi F, Lino S, Cerutti S. Spontaneous fluctuations of human pupil reflect central autonomic rhythms. Methods Inf Med. 2000;39(2):142–145.
  24. Hammel N, Belghith A, Weinreb RN, Medeiros FA, Mendoza N, Zangwill LM. Comparing the rates of retinal nerve fiber layer and ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer loss in healthy eyes and in glaucoma eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2017;178:38–50.
  25. Kim YK, Ha A, Na KI, Kim HJ, Jeoung JW, Park KH. Temporal relation between macular ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer loss and peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(7):1056–1064.
  26. Lee WJ, Kim YK, Park KH, Jeoung JW. Trend-based analysis of ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer thickness changes on optical coherence tomography in glaucoma progression. Ophthalmology. 2017;124(9):1383–1391.
  27. Miki A, Medeiros FA, Weinreb RN, et al. Rates of retinal nerve fiber layer thinning in glaucoma suspect eyes. Ophthalmology. 2014;121(7):1350–1358.
  28. Sehi M, Zhang X, Greenfield DS, et al. Retinal nerve fiber layer atrophy is associated with visual field loss over time in glaucoma suspect and glaucomatous eyes. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013;155(1):73–82.e1.
© Wroclaw Medical University