Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
2018, vol. 27, nr 7, July, p. 963–969
doi: 10.17219/acem/70795
Publication type: original article
Language: English
Download citation:
PIK3CA mutation in gastric cancer and the role of microsatellite instability status in mutations of exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene
1 Unit of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, University of Siena, Italy
2 Department of Surgical Oncology, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
3 Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology Unit, San Donato Hospital, Arezzo, Italy
4 Department of Medical, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Italy
5 Department of Pathology, Hospital Department of University of Siena, Italy
Abstract
Background. A better understanding of molecular gastric cancer (GC) entities may help in tailored treatments of that neoplasm. The PIK3CA mutation is one of the most important in many cancers.
Objectives. We performed a comparison of clinical and pathological data of the PIK3CA mutation in GC patients.
Material and Methods. The analysis was done on 472 patients operated on in 1 center. Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used for the screening of PIK3CA (exon 9 and 20). For microsatellite instability (MSI) we used 5 quasi-monomorphic mononucleotide repeats − BAT-26, BAT-25, NR-24, NR-21, and NR-27. The clinical and pathological data was analyzed.
Results. PIK3CA mutation was observed in 10 out of 472 GC patients (2.1%). Nine out of 10 were MSI (9 of 111 MSI patients – 8.1%). Half of the 10 patients had mutations in exon 9 and the other half in exon 20. A majority of patients with the PIK3CA mutation had MSI (p < 0.001). The 5-year survival of MSI patients with the PIK3CA mutation was 40% and without the mutation, 70.4% (p = 0.309). For patients with the mutation in exon 9, the 5-year survival was 0%, and for those with the mutation in exon 20, 80% (p = 0.031). The Cox proportional hazards regression analysis did not show that PIK3CA is statistically correlated with a worse overall survival.
Conclusion. PIK3CA mutation in GC is a rare finding. It is strongly associated with the MSI molecular subgroup, presenting a worse outcome than other MSI patients. A completely different outcome is associated with the mutation in exon 9 compared to the mutation in exon 20, with the latter being more favorable.
Key words
gastric cancer, PIK3CA, mutation, microsatellite instability, exon
References (30)
- Cristescu R, Lee J, Nebozhyn M, et al. Molecular analysis of gastric cancer identifies subtypes associated with distinct clinical outcomes. Nat Med. 2015;21(5):449–456.
- Wadhwa R, Song S, Lee JS, Yao Y, Wei Q, Ajani JA. Gastric cancer-molecular and clinical dimensions. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013;10:643–655.
- Willems L, Tamburini J, Chapuis N, Lacombe C, Mayeux P, Bouscary D. PI3K and mTOR signaling pathways in cancer: New data on targeted therapies. Curr Oncol Rep. 2012;14:129–138.
- Lai K, Killingsworth MC, Lee CS. Gene of the month: PIK3CA. J Clin Pathol. 2015;68:253–257.
- Volinia S, Hiles I, Ormondroyd E, et al. Molecular cloning, cDNA sequence, and chromosomal localization of the human phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase p110 alpha (PIK3CA) gene. Genomics. 1994;24: 472–477.
- Day FL, Jorissen RN, Lipton L, et al. PIK3CA and PTEN gene and exon mutation-specific clinicopathologic and molecular associations in colorectal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2013;19(12):3285–3296.
- Whitehall VL, Rickman C, Bond CE, et al. Oncogenic PIK3CA mutations in colorectal cancers and polyps. Int J Cancer. 2012;131:813–820.
- Mao C, Yang ZY, Hu XF, Chen Q, Tang JL. PIK3CA exon 20 mutations as a potential biomarker for resistance to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies in KRAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Oncol. 2012;23:1518–1525.
- Tapia O, Riquelme I, Leal P, et al. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway is activated in gastric cancer with potential prognostic and predictive significance. Virchows Arch. 2014;465:25–33.
- Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network. Comprehensive molecular characterization of gastric adenocarcinoma. Nature. 2014;513(7517): 202–209.
- Isa N. Evidence based radiation oncology with existing technology. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2014;19(6):259–266.
- Polom W, Markuszewski M, Rho YS, Matuszewski M. Usage of invisible near infrared light (NIR) fluorescence with indocyanine green (ICG) and methylene blue (MB) in urological oncology. Part 1. Cent European J Urol. 2014;67(2):142–148.
- Subhash VV, Yeo MS, Tan WL, Yong WP. Strategies and advancements in harnessing the immune system for gastric cancer immunotherapy. J Immunol Res. 2015;308574. doi: 10.1155/2015/308574
- Alocci D, Mariethoz J, Horlacher O, Bolleman JT, Campbell MP, Lisacek F. Property Graph vs RDF triple store: A comparison on glycan substructure search. PLoS One. 2015;10(12):e0144578. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0144578
- Mereiter S, Magalhães A, Adamczyk B, et al. Glycomic analysis of gastric carcinoma cells discloses glycans as modulators of RON receptor tyrosine kinase activation in cancer. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016; 1860(8):1795–1808.
- Beghelli S, de Manzoni G, Barbi S, et al. Microsatellite instability in gastric cancer is associated with better prognosis in only stage II cancers. Surgery. 2006;139:347–356.
- Corso G, Pedrazzani C, Marrelli D, Pascale V, Pinto E, Roviello F. Correlation of microsatellite instability at multiple loci with long‐term survival in advanced gastric carcinoma. Arch Surg. 2009;144:722–727.
- Marrelli D, Polom K, Pascale V, et al. Strong prognostic value of microsatellite instability in intestinal type non-cardia gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23(3):943–950.
- Velho S, Oliveira C, Ferreira A, et al. The prevalence of PIK3CA mutations in gastric and colon cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:1649–1654.
- Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, et al. A National Cancer Institute workshop on microsatellite instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: Development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58(22):5248–5257.
- Sukawa Y, Yamamoto H, Nosho K, et al. Alterations in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-v-Akt pathway in gastric cancer. World J Gastroenterol. 2012;18(45): 6577–6586. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v18.i45.6577
- Fang WL, Huang KH, Lan YT, et al. Mutations in PI3K/AKT pathway genes and amplifications of PIK3CA are associated with patterns of recurrence in gastric cancers. Oncotarget. 2016;7(5):6201–6220. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.6641
- Catasus L, Gallardo A, Cuatrecasas M, Jaime P. PIK3CA mutations in the kinase domain (exon 20) of uterine endometrial adenocarcinomas are associated with adverse prognostic parameters. Mod Pathol. 2008;21:131–139.
- Kalinsky K, Jacks LM, Heguy A, Patil S, Prat J. PIK3CA mutation associates with improved outcome in breast cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2009; 15:5049–5059.
- Janku F, Garrido-Laguna I, Petruzelka LB, Stewart DJ, Kurzrock R. Novel therapeutic targets in non-small cell lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2011;6:1601–1612.
- Warneke VS, Behrens HM, Haag J, et al. Prognostic and putative predictive biomarkers of gastric cancer for personalized medicine. Diagn Mol Pathol. 2013;22(3):127–137. doi: 10.1097/PDM0b013e318284188e
- Barbi S, Cataldo I, De Manzoni G, et al. The analysis of PIK3CA mutations in gastric carcinoma and metaanalysis of literature suggest that exon-selectivity is a signature of cancer type. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16:29–32.
- Kostakis GC, Papadogeorgakis N, Koumaki V, Kamakari S, Koumaki D, Alexandridis C. Absence of hotspot mutations in exons 9 and 20 of the PIK3CA gene in human oral squamous cell carcinoma in the Greek population. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2010;109:e53–58. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2010.01.015
- Fenic I, Steger K, Gruber C, Arens C, Woenckhaus J. Analysis of PIK3CA and Akt/protein kinase B in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oncol Rep. 2007;18:253–259.
- Seiwert, TY, Zuo Z, Keck MK, et al. Integrative and comparative genomic analysis of HPV-positive and HPV-negative head and neck squamous cell carcinomas. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(3):632–641. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-13-3310


