Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine
2018, vol. 27, nr 12, December, p. 1711–1716
doi: 10.17219/acem/75724
Publication type: original article
Language: English
Download citation:
The use of direct immunofluorescence and nested polymerase chain reaction in diagnosing perinatal infections of Chlamydia trachomatis
1 Department of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
2 1st Department and Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Medicine, Wroclaw Medical University, Poland
Abstract
Background. Chlamydia infection is the most frequently reported infectious, sexually transmitted disease (STD). Generally, Chlamydia trachomatis (C. trachomatis) infection of neonates is the result of perinatal exposure to the mother’s infected cervix.
Objectives. The aim of the study was to estimate the frequency of infection caused by C. trachomatis in newborn infants. In this study of C. trachomatis perinatal infection, 107 infants born at the Wroclaw Medical University Clinic of Gynecology and Obstetrics (Poland) were tested to investigate whether C. trachomatis was present in swabs taken from the eyes and throats of children.
Material and Methods. Each specimen was tested using the direct immunofluorescence test (DIF) and the nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method.
Results. The presence of C. trachomatis, irrespective of the origin of the swabs (ocular or from the throat), was confirmed in 62 newborns, amounting to 57.6% of the tested population. The occurrence of C. trachomatis in ocular swabs was confirmed in 35 children (32.7%). In the material taken from the throat, there were 48 newborns considered chlamydia-positive (44.9%). In the specimens taken from both the ocular and pharyngeal locations, there was a higher proportion of positive results while using the nested-PCR method in comparison to the DIF test. The specificity of the DIF method with reference to the nested-PCR was 67.9% for ocular swabs. In the material taken from the throat, the sensitivity of the DIF method with reference to the nested-PCR was 75.0% and the specificity was 62.1%.
Conclusion. Because of the importance of perinatal infections, it is recommended to perform a study among a larger group of patients in order to gain more reliable results.
Key words
Chlamydia trachomatis, infection, newborn
References (15)
- World Health Organization. Baseline report on global sexually transmitted infection surveillance. WHO; 2012. http://www.who.int/reproductivehealth/publications/rtis/9789241505895/en/.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually Transmitted Disease Surveillance 2013. Atlanta, GA: Department of Health and Human Services; 2014.
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Recommendations for the laboratory-based detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae – 2014. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2014;63(RR-02):1–19.
- Workowski KA, Berman S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2010. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2010;59(RR-12):1–110.
- Choroszy-Król I, Frej-Mądrzak M, Jama-Kmiecik A, Bober T, Sarowska J. Characteristics of the Chlamydia trachomatis species: Immunopathology and infections. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2012;21(6):799–808.
- Frej -Mądrzak M, Krzemińska I, Choroszy-Król I. Zakażenia chlamydialne u dzieci. Forum Zakażeń. 2011;2(3):41–44.
- Wilkowska-Trojniel M. Udział zakażenia Chlamydia trachomatis w niepowodzeniach ciążowych u kobiet w regionie północno-wschodniej Polski. Akademia Medyczna w Białymstoku, Poland; 2007.
- World Health Organization. Global Strategy for the Prevention and Control of Sexually Transmitted Infections: 2006–2015. WHO; 2007. http://www.who.int/hiv/pub/toolkits/stis_strategy%5B1%5Den.pdf.
- Nitsch-Osuch A, Wardyn KA, Choroszy-Król I. Zakażenia wywołane patogenami atypowymi w praktyce lekarskiej. Wrocław, Poland: Górnicki Wydawnictwo Medyczne; 2007:11–22.
- Pawlikowska M, Deptuła W. Choroby u ludzi spowodowane chlamydiami i chlamydofilami. Postepy Hig Med Dosw. 2007;61:708–717.
- Frej -Mądrzak M, Teryks-Wołyniec D, Jama-Kmiecik A, Sarowska J, Gosciniak G, Choroszy-Król I. Zakażenia układu moczowo-płciowego oraz spojówek Chlamydia trachomatis u dorosłych i dzieci w latach 2012–2013. Family Medicine & Primary Care Review. 2014;16(3):225–227.
- Di Bartolomeo S, Mirta DH, Janer M, et al. Incidence of Chlamydia trachomatis and other potential pathogens in neonatal conjunctivitis. Int J Infect Dis. 2001;5(3):139–143.
- Khoshdel A, Taheri S, Khadivi R, et al. Incidence and bacteriological profile of neonatal conjunctivitis in Hajar Hospital, Shahrekord, Iran. Iran J Pathol. 2012;7(2):86–91.
- Bekler C, Kultursay N, Ozacar T, Sayiner A, Yalaz M, Akisu M. Chlamydial infections in term and preterm neonates. Jpn J Infect Dis. 2012;65:1–6.
- Yu J, Wu S, Li F, Hu L. Vertical transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis in Chongqing, China. Curr Microbiol. 2009;58(4):315–320.


