Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
5-Year IF – 2.0, IF – 1.9, JCI (2024) – 0.43
Scopus CiteScore – 4.3
Q1 in SJR 2024, SJR score – 0.598, H-index: 49 (SJR)
ICV – 161.00; MNiSW – 70 pts
Initial editorial assessment and first decision within 24 h

ISSN 1899–5276 (print), ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2015, vol. 24, nr 6, November-December, p. 965–971

doi: 10.17219/acem/26940

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Prognostic Implications of Discordant Results of Myocardial Perfusion Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography and Exercise ECG Test in Patients with Stable Angina

Ewelina Kowalczyk1,B,C,D,E,F, Dominika Filipiak-Strzecka1,B,C,E, Piotr Hamala1,B,C,E, Nina Śmiech1,B,C, Jarosław D. Kasprzak1,A,C,E,F, Jacek Kuśmierek2,A,C,E,F, Anna Płachcińska2,A,C,E,F, Piotr Lipiec1,A,C,E,F

1 Department of Cardiology, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

2 Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Lodz, Poland

Abstract

Background. ECG exercise treadmill test (ExT) and myocardial perfusion SPECT (single photon emission computed tomography) study are widely used for the non-invasive evaluation of patients with coronary artery disease (CAD).
Objectives. To assess long-term prognosis in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease (CAD), in whom ECG exercise treadmill test (ExT) and myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) provided discordant results are lacking.
Material and Methods. Four hundred eighty three patients with suspected or known stable CAD underwent 99mTc-methoxyisobutylisonitrile SPECT and ExT. SPECT was considered positive (+) if inducible or mixed perfusion defects were detected. ExT was evaluated using widely accepted criteria. Based on the results of both examinations the patients were divided into 4 subgroups: group 1 – SPECT (+) and ExT (+), group 2 – SPECT (+) and ExT (–), group 3 – SPECT (–) and ExT (+), group 4 – SPECT (–) and ExT (–).
Results. After a mean follow-up of 59 ± 7 months, major cardiac events (cardiac death and nonfatal myocardial infarction combined) and revascularizations were more prevalent in groups 1 and 2 than in groups 3 and 4. However, the statistical significance (p ≤ 0.01) was reached only for the following differences: in major cardiac events – group 1 vs group 3 and group 1 vs group 4; in revascularizations – group 1 vs. group 3, group 1 vs. group 4 and group 2 vs group 4 and in cardiac hospitalizations – group 1 vs. group 4 and group 2 vs. group 4.
Conclusion. Positive myocardial perfusion SPECT result is associated with similar clinical outcome irrespectively of ExT result in long-term follow-up.

Key words

prognosis, coronary artery disease, myocardial perfusion SPECT, exercise test

References (22)

  1. ESC Guidelines on the management of stable angina pectoris: full text. Eur Heart J 2006, 27, 1341–1381.
  2. Gibbons RJ, Abrams J, Chatterjee K, Daley J, Deedwania PC, Douglas JS: ACC/AHA 2002 guideline update for the management of patients with chronic stable angina: a report of the American College of Cardiology/ /American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Update the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of Patients with Chronic Stable Angina). The American College of Cardiology 2002 (Available online: www.acc.org).
  3. Schinkel AFL, Bax JJ, Geleijnse ML, Boersman E, Elhendy A, Roelandt JR: Noninvasive evaluation of ischaemic heart disease: myocardial perfusion imaging or stress echocardiography? Eur Heart J 2003, 24, 789–800.
  4. McNeer JF, Margolis JR, Lee KL, Kisslo JA, Peter RH, Kong Y: The role of the exercise test in the evaluation of patients for ischemic heart disease. Circulation 1978, 57, 64–70.
  5. Underwood SR, Anagnostopolus C, Cerqueira M, Ell PJ, Flint EJ, Harbinson M: Myocardial perfusion scintygraphy: the evidence. A consensus conference organized by British Cardiac Society, endorsed by the Royal College of Physicans of London and Royal College of Radiologist, Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2004, 31, 261–289.
  6. Stratmann HG, Williams GA, Wittry MD, Chaitman BR, Miller DD: Exercise technetium-99m sestamibi tomography for cardiac risk stratification of patients with stable chest pain. Circulation 1994, 89, 615–622.
  7. Olmos LI, Dakik H, Gordon R, Dunn K, Verani MS, Quiñones MA: Long-term prognostic value of exercise echocardiography compared with exercise 201 Tl, ECG, and clinical variables in patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Circulation 1998, 98, 2679–2686.
  8. Vanzetto G, Ormezzano O, Fagret D, Comet M, Denis B, Machecourt J: Long-term additive prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical and exercise stress test in low to intermediate risk patients. Circulation 1999, 100, 1521–1527.
  9. Zerahn B, Jensen BV, Nielsen KM, Møller S: Increased prognostic value of combined myocardial perfusion imaging and exercise electrocardiography in patients with with coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol 2000, 7, 616–622.
  10. Iskander S, Iskandarian AE: Risk assessment using single photon emission computed tomographic 99mTc sestamibi imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998, 32, 57–62.
  11. Boyne TS, Koplan BA, Parsons WJ, Smith WH, Watson DD, Beller GA: Predicting adverse outcome with exercise SPECT technetium-99m-sestamibi imaging in patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 1997, 79, 270–274.
  12. Thomas GS, Miyamoto MI, Morello AP 3rd, Majmundar H, Thomas JJ, Sampson CH: Technetium 99m sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging predicts clinical outcome in the community outpatient setting. The Nuclear Utility in the Community (NUC) Study. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004, 43, 213–223.
  13. Schinkel AFL, Boiten HJ, van der Sijde JN, Ruitinga PR, Sijbrands EJ, Valkema R: Prediction of 9-year cardiovascular outcomes by myocardial perfusion imagining in patients with normal exercise electrocardiographic testing. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging 2012, 13, 900–904.
  14. Razei G, Tavakoli A, Seifollahi S, Amoiei M, Javadi H, Assadi M: One-year prognosis of patients with normal myocardial perfusion imaging using technetium-99m sestamibi in suspected coronary artery disease: a singlecenter experience of 1,047 patients. Perfusion 2011, 26, 309–314.
  15. Ueyama T, Takehana K, Maeba H, Iwasaka T: Prognostic value of normal stress-only technetium-99m myocardial perfusion imaging protocol – comparison with standard stress-rest protocol. Circ J 2012, 76, 2386–2391.
  16. Duvall WL, Wijetunga MN, Klein TM, Razzouk L, Godbold J, Henzlova MJ: The prognosis of a normal stressonly Tc-99m myocardial perfusion imaging study. J Nucl Cardiol 2010, 17, 370–377.
  17. Elhendy A, Schinkel A, Bax JJ, van Domburg RT, Poldermans D: Long-term prognosis after a normal exercise stress Tc-99m sestamibi SPECT study. J Nucl Cardiol 2003, 10, 261–266.
  18. Schinkel AFL, Boiten HJ, van der Sijde JN, Ruitinga PR, Sijbrands EJ, Valkema R: 15-Year outcome after normal exercise 99m-Tc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging: What is the duration of low risk after a normal scan? J Nucl Cardiol 2012, 19, 901–906.
  19. Supariwala A, Uretsky S, Singh P, Memon S, Khokhar SS, Waver-Pinzon O: Synergistic effect of coronary artery disease risk factors on long-term survival in patients with normal exercise SPECT studies. J Nucl Cardiol 2011, 18, 207–214.
  20. Sicari R, Nihoyannopoulos P, Evangelista A, Kasprzak J, Lancellotti P, Voigt JU: European Association of Echocardiography. Stress echocardiography expert consensus statement: European Association of Echocardiography (EAE) (a registered branch of the ESC). Eur J Echocardiogr 2008, 9, 415–437.
  21. Wejner-Mik P, Lipiec P, Kasprzak JD: Real-time myocardial perfusion stress echocardiography for the assessment of prognosis in patients with suspected ischemic heart disease. Pol Przegl Kard 2012, 14, 13–17.
  22. Cohen Y, Acio E, Heo J, Hughes E, Narula J, Iskandrian AE: Comparison of the prognostic value of qualitative versus quantitative stress tomographic perfusion imaging. Am J Cardiol 1999, 83, 945–948.