Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
5-Year IF – 2.0, IF – 1.9, JCI (2024) – 0.43
Scopus CiteScore – 4.3
Q1 in SJR 2024, SJR score – 0.598, H-index: 49 (SJR)
ICV – 161.00; MNiSW – 70 pts
Initial editorial assessment and first decision within 24 h

ISSN 1899–5276 (print), ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Ahead of print

doi: 10.17219/acem/207254

Publication type: original article

Thematic category: Basic sciences; dermatology

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:


Julanon N, Chaowattanapanit S, Choonhakarn C, et al. Regulatory T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells in drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms VS maculopapular drug eruption: A serological pilot study [published online as ahead of print on February 23, 2026]. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2026. doi:10.17219/acem/207254

Regulatory T cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells in drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms VS maculopapular drug eruption: A serological pilot study

Narachai Julanon1,B,C,D,E,F, Suteeraporn Chaowattanapanit1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Charoen Choonhakarn1,B,C,E,F, Rachot Wongjirattikarn1,B,C,E,F, Thapphan Chakrit2,B,C,E,F, Kanin Salao2,3,B,C,E,F, Kittisak Sawanyawisuth1,B,C,E,F

1 Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

2 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand

3 Department of Physiology, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore

Graphical abstract


Graphical abstracts

Highlights


• Regulatory T (Treg) cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cell (pDC) levels were significantly reduced during the acute phase of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome and maculopapular drug eruption compared with healthy controls.
• Regulatory T cells progressively increased during disease resolution, whereas pDCs continued to decline throughout the recovery phase.
• Following steroid withdrawal in drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, both Treg cell and pDC levels showed a gradual increase.
• Dynamic changes in Treg cell and pDC levels suggest their involvement in immune regulation and inflammatory modulation in drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome and maculopapular drug eruption.

Abstract

Background. Regulatory T (Treg) cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) are involved in the pathogenesis of drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS).

Objectives. To compare circulating Treg cells and pDCs at different stages among patients with DRESS/DIHS, patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE), and healthy subjects, and to assess circulating Treg cells and pDCs at post-steroid cessation in DRESS/DIHS.

Materials and methods. This was a cross-sectional study that enrolled adult patients diagnosed with DRESS/DIHS and MPE. Blood samples were obtained from the patients at the initial presentation (acute phase), 1 week later (subacute phase), during the 3rd week (resolution phase), and post-steroid cessation for DRESS/DIHS. Healthy subjects’ blood samples were also taken. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated for flow cytometry analysis.

Results. A total of 22 patients participated in this study: patients with DRESS/DIHS (n = 9), patients with MPE (n = 8), and healthy subjects (n = 5). During the acute stage of DRESS/DIHS and MPE, the mean percentage of Treg cells and pDCs significantly decreased compared to healthy subjects. However, Treg cells showed a progressive increase towards the resolution phase in both conditions, while pDCs continued to decrease towards the resolution phase. Following steroid discontinuation in DRESS/DIHS, both Treg cells and pDCs showed a progressive increase in number.

Conclusions. Treg cells and pDCs play a role in DRESS/DIHS and MPE pathogenesis, evidenced by the fluctuation in their percentages at each stage of both conditions. However, increased circulating Treg cells may crucially mitigate inflammation in both conditions.

Key words: regulatory T cells, plasmacytoid dendritic cells, drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome, drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, maculopapular drug eruption

Background

Drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS) is a severe, delayed-type hypersensitivity reaction. It is characterized by high fever, widespread skin eruptions that are typically morbilliform but may also be pleomorphic, lymphadenopathy, hematologic abnormalities such as atypical lymphocytosis in the early stage and eosinophilia in the later stage, and multiorgan involvement, with liver enzyme elevation being the most common manifestation. Delayed diagnosis can result in significant morbidity and a mortality rate of up to 7%. The diagnosis of DRESS is established using the European RegiSCAR scoring system, which includes 7 clinical features. A score greater than 5 indicates a definite diagnosis of DRESS.1 The pathogenesis of DRESS is complex and not fully understood. However, several mechanisms have been proposed, including genetic predisposition associated with specific human leukocyte antigen alleles that affect drug metabolism, reactivation of human herpesviruses (HHVs) – particularly HHV-6, cytomegalovirus, and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) – and dysregulation of the immune response mediated by T cells, all of which are thought to play central roles in the development of DRESS/DIHS.2

Regulatory T (Treg) cells and plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) have been reported to play a role in the pathogenesis of DRESS/DIHS. Treg cells are essential for regulating and suppressing immune responses to self-antigens, promoting peripheral tolerance, preventing autoimmunity, and limiting chronic inflammatory diseases.3, 4 A previous study showed that Treg cells expand during the acute stage of DRESS/DIHS but decrease in both number and function during the resolution phase.5 These findings suggest a prolonged onset of clinical features, HHV reactivation and the potential development of autoimmunity following recovery from DRESS/DIHS. In contrast, pDCs play a crucial role in antiviral immunity and are also involved in the development of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases.6 Previous studies demonstrated that the number of circulating pDCs decreases around the time of viral reactivation in DRESS/DIHS compared with other drug eruptions.7, 8 These findings further support the role of viral reactivation in the pathogenesis of DRESS/DIHS.

Objectives

There are limited studies investigating circulating Treg cells and pDCs in DRESS/DIHS at different time points. This study aimed to identify alterations in circulating Treg cells and pDCs at different disease stages in patients with DRESS/DIHS, patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE), and healthy subjects, as well as to assess circulating Treg cells and pDCs after steroid cessation in DRESS/DIHS.

Materials and methods

Study design

This was a cross-sectional study conducted from October 2019 to December 2022 at Khon Kaen University’s Srinagarind Hospital in Thailand.

Participants

Adult patients aged 18 years or older diagnosed with DRESS/DIHS and/or MPE were recruited. Patients who had received systemic steroids or immunosuppressive drugs before enrollment were excluded. DRESS/DIHS was defined according to the diagnostic criteria established by the European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions (RegiSCAR) group, including fever >38.5°C, lymphadenopathy, skin rash suggestive of DRESS/DIHS, eosinophilia or atypical lymphocytosis, internal organ involvement, disease duration >15 days, and exclusion of other potential causes.2 Maculopapular drug eruption, also referred to as exanthematous drug eruption, was defined as widespread erythematous macules and papules symmetrically distributed over the trunk and extremities, without systemic symptoms or internal organ involvement.

Variables

Demographic data and baseline characteristics, including age, sex, disease onset and duration, RegiSCAR score, and culprit medication, were recorded. Medical comorbidities were also documented and classified as immune abnormalities (such as HIV infection, adult-onset immunodeficiency, and autoimmune diseases) or non-immune abnormalities. Blood samples were obtained at different stages: at the initial presentation (acute phase or visit 1), 1 week later (subacute phase or visit 2), during the 3rd week (resolution phase or visit 3), and after discontinuation of systemic steroids in patients with DRESS/DIHS (visit 4). Blood samples were also collected from 5 healthy subjects as normal controls. Patients with DRESS/DIHS received prednisolone at a dose of 0.5–1 mg/kg/day after the first blood sample was obtained. Patients with MPE were treated with topical corticosteroids and antihistamines. The percentages of Treg cells and pDCs were evaluated by flow cytometry using a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences, Franklin Lakes, USA).

Peripheral blood mononuclear cells isolation

A total of 6 mL of venous whole blood was collected from each participant by venipuncture and placed into sodium heparin tubes (cat. No. 367874; BD Biosciences). The whole blood was then diluted with ×1 phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) at a 1:1 ratio. Following dilution, peripheral blood mononuclear cells were isolated using Ficoll–Paque PLUS (density = 1.077 g/mL; cat. No. 71-7167-00 AG; GE Healthcare, Chicago, USA) at a 4:3 ratio and centrifuged at 400 × g for 40 min at 20°C without braking. Subsequently, peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were collected into a new sterile 15 mL centrifuge tube using a sterile plastic dropper. The isolated PBMCs were gently washed twice with 7 mL of 1× PBS and centrifuged for 10 min at 22°C at 500 × g and 260 × g (for platelet removal), respectively. The supernatant was discarded, and the PBMCs were then resuspended in 1 mL of freezing medium consisting of 90% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 10% dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO; cat. No. A3672; PanReac AppliChem, Chicago, USA). Cryopreserved cells from all subjects were stored at −80°C until use.

Cell surface markers and intracellular cytokine staining

Isolated PBMCs were gently thawed at 37°C and then stimulated with 100 ng/mL phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA; cat. No. P1585; Sigma-Aldrich, Burlington, USA) and 1 µg/mL ionomycin calcium salt (cat. No. I-0634; Sigma-Aldrich). Simultaneously, the cells were incubated with 3 µg/mL brefeldin A (eBioscience, San Diego, USA) at 37°C for 2 h. Subsequently, the cells were washed with R10 medium (RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS; cat. No. 31800105; Gibco, Waltham, USA) and centrifuged at 400 × g for 10 min. The stimulated PBMCs were then stained with multicolor fluorochrome-conjugated monoclonal antibodies: anti-human CD45 phycoerythrin-cyanine 7 (PE-Cy7; HI30; eBioscience), anti-human CD3 allophycocyanin-eFluor® 780 (APC-eFluor® 780; OKT3; eBioscience), anti-human CD4 eFluor® 450 (RPA-T4; eBioscience), and anti-human CD123 phycoerythrin (PE; 6H6; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). Incubation was carried out for 15 min on ice in the dark. Intracellular staining was performed sequentially after surface staining. Cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde and permeabilized using fixation and permeabilization buffer (cat. No. 130-090-47; Miltenyi Biotec, Bergisch Gladbach, Germany) for 10 min on ice in the dark. Subsequently, the cells were stained with anti-human FoxP3 peridinin–chlorophyll–cyanine 5.5 (PerCP-Cy5.5; PCH101; eBioscience) for 30 min, followed by washing with staining buffer (×1 PBS containing 2% FBS). Finally, the samples were analyzed using a BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer (BD Biosciences). The analysis was performed at the Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand.

Gating strategy

Lymphocytes were identified using forward scatter (FSC) and side scatter (SSC). Subsequently, singlet cells were identified based on forward scatter area (FSC-A) and forward scatter height (FSC-H). CD45+ expression was then gated on singlet lymphocytes. Treg cells were identified based on the expression of CD3+ and CD4+, together with intracellular FoxP3. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells were gated as CD3CD123+ cells.

Statistical analyses

With respect to baseline characteristics, numerical variables were presented as medians with the 1st and 3rd quartiles (Q1–Q3) and the minimum–maximum range, as the number of subjects in each group was fewer than 10. Comparisons of numerical variables between 2 groups were performed using the Mann–Whitney U test, whereas differences among three groups were assessed using the Kruskal–Wallis test. Categorical variables were reported as numbers (percentages). The Fisher–Freeman–Halton test was used to assess differences in proportions among 2 or 3 groups.

For the percentages of Treg cells and pDCs, a generalized estimating equation (GEE) model with the following parameters was applied: 1) family, Gaussian; 2) link function, identity; and 3) correlation structure, exchangeable. This model was used to compare the 3 study populations (DRESS/DIHS, MPE and healthy subjects) across 4 visits (visits 1–4). In addition, a subgroup analysis according to immune status was performed for patients with DRESS/DIHS and MPE. The mean (standard deviation (SD)) percentages of Treg cells and pDCs were reported because these variables followed a normal distribution and were analyzed using a GEE model. The regression coefficient, its 95% confidence interval (95% CI), z-value, and p-value for the percentages of Treg cells and pDCs were also reported. Model adequacy was assessed by examining residual plots across the 3 study groups to evaluate the presence of systematic bias, heteroscedasticity or outliers. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata v. 18.0 (StataCorp, College Station, USA). A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Baseline characteristics of the patients and healthy subjects

A total of 22 participants were included in this study: patients with DRESS/DIHS (n = 9), patients with MPE (n = 8) and healthy subjects (n = 5). The baseline characteristics of the participants are presented in Table 1. The DRESS/DIHS group differed significantly from the MPE group in terms of disease onset duration. Among the participants, 4 patients with DRESS/DIHS and 5 patients with MPE had immune abnormalities.

The percentage of Treg cells in DRESS/DIHS, with MPE and healthy subjects at different time points

The mean percentages of Treg cells in patients with DRESS/DIHS, with MPE and healthy subjects at different time points are presented in Table 2.

In the acute stage (visit 1), the mean percentage of Treg cells was significantly lower in DRESS/DIHS compared to healthy subjects (β = −2.10, 95% CI: −3.44 to −0.75, z = −3.05, p = 0.002) and also significantly lower in MPE compared to healthy subjects (β = −2.10, 95% CI: −3.47 to −0.72, z = −2.99, p = 0.003), as shown in Figure 1 and Table 3.

In the subacute phase (visit 2), the mean percentage of Treg cells significantly increased in DRESS/DIHS compared to the acute stage (β = 2.16, 95% CI: 0.97–3.35, z = 3.56, p < 0.001) and significantly increased in MPE compared to the acute stage (β = 3.27, 95% CI: 2.01–4.53, z = 5.09, p < 0.001).

In the resolution phase (visit 3), the mean percentage of Treg cells showed a tendency to increase in the resolution phase compared to the subacute phase in DRESS/DIHS (β = 0.82, 95% CI: −0.37 to 2.00, z = 1.35, p = 0.178). No significant difference between the subacute and the resolution phases in MPE was observed (β = −0.04, 95% CI: −1.30 to 1.22; z = −0.06, p = 0.949).

In the post-steroid cessation period in DRESS/DIHS (visit 4), the mean percentage of Treg cells showed a further increase compared to the resolution phase (β = 1.17, 95% CI: −0.05 to 2.39, z = 1.88, p = 0.060). The mean percentage of Treg cells was significantly higher after steroid discontinuation compared with healthy controls (β = 2.05, 95% CI: 0.67 to 3.42, z = 2.92, p = 0.003). No significant differences were detected between the DRESS/DIHS and MPE groups during the acute phase (β = 0.003, 95% CI: −1.17 to 1.18, z = 0.01, p = 0.996), subacute phase (β = −1.11, 95% CI: −2.28 to 0.06, z = −1.85, p = 0.064), or resolution phase (β = −0.25, 95% CI: −1.42 to 0.92, z = −0.42, p = 0.673).

The percentage of Treg cells in DRESS/DIHS and MPE with and without immune abnormalities

In patients with DRESS/DIHS, a consistent increase in the percentage of Treg cells was observed from visit 1 to visit 4 in both patients with and without immune abnormalities, as shown in Figure 2 and Table 4. No significant differences were observed between patients with and without immune abnormalities at any visit (visit 1: β = −0.98, 95% CI: −2.48 to 0.52, z = −1.28, p = 0.200; visit 2: β = 0.84, 95% CI: −0.66 to 2.34, z = 1.10, p = 0.271; visit 3: β = 0.59, 95% CI: −0.91 to 2.08, z = 0.77, p = 0.444; visit 4: β = −0.53, 95% CI: −2.02 to 0.97, z = −0.69, p = 0.491), as shown in Table 5.

In patients with MPE, the percentage of Treg cells increased from the acute to the subacute phase in both patients with and without immune abnormalities (Figure 3, Table 4). During the resolution phase, the percentage of Treg cells increased in patients with immune abnormalities but decreased in those without immune abnormalities; however, this difference did not reach statistical significance (β = 1.34, 95% CI: −0.29 to 2.97, z = 1.61, p = 0.106; Figure 3, Table 5).

The percentage of pDCs in DRESS/DIHS, MPE, and healthy subjects at different time points

The mean percentages of pDCs in patients with DRESS/DIHS, with MPE, and in healthy subjects at different time points are shown in Table 2.

In the acute stage, the mean percentage of pDCs was significantly lower in patients with DRESS/DIHS than in healthy subjects (β = −0.67, 95% CI: −0.83 to −0.52, z = −8.64, p < 0.001) and was also significantly lower in patients with MPE than in healthy subjects (β = −0.66, 95% CI: −0.72 to −0.41, z = −7.11, p < 0.001), as shown in Figure 4 and Table 6.

In the subacute phase, the mean percentage of pDCs was significantly lower than in the acute stage in patients with MPE (β = −0.15, 95% CI: −0.28 to −0.01, z = −2.11, p = 0.035), as shown in Table 6. However, no significant difference was detected in the DRESS/DIHS group (β = −0.04, 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.09, z = −0.58, p = 0.559).

In the resolution phase, the mean percentage of pDCs showed a tendency to increase compared with the subacute phase in both DRESS/DIHS and MPE (β = 0.02, 95% CI: −0.11 to 0.15, z = 0.33, p = 0.738 and β = 0.05, 95% CI: −0.09 to 0.18, z = 0.71, p = 0.480, respectively; Table 6).

In the post-steroid cessation period in DRESS/DIHS, the mean percentage of pDCs was significantly higher after discontinuation of systemic steroids compared with the resolution phase (β = 0.49, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.62, z = 7.30, p < 0.001). However, the mean percentage of pDCs remained significantly lower after discontinuation of systemic steroids compared with healthy controls (β = −0.20, 95% CI: −0.36 to −0.04, z = −2.52, p = 0.012). No significant differences in the percentages of pDCs between the DRESS/DIHS and MPE groups were detected in the acute (β = −0.11, 95% CI: −0.24 to 0.03, z = −1.58, p = 0.115), subacute (β = −0.0003, 95% CI: −0.13 to 0.13, z = 0.00, p = 0.996), or resolution phases (β = −0.03, 95% CI: −0.16 to 0.11, z = −0.39, p = 0.696).

The percentage of pDCs in DRESS/DIHS and MPE with and without immune abnormalities

In patients with DRESS/DIHS, the percentage of pDCs decreased in those with immune abnormalities during the subacute to resolution phase, while the percentage of pDCs tended to increase in patients without immune abnormalities. The percentage of pDCs increased significantly after systemic steroids cessation in both groups compared to the resolution phase (β = 0.60, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.76, z = 7.34, p < 0.001 for immune abnormalities; β = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.25 to 0.54, z = 5.41, p < 0.001 for without immune abnormalities; Figure 5, Table 4). No significant differences were detected between the 2 groups at any visit (visit 1: β = 0.09, 95% CI: −0.07 to 0.25, z = 1.05, p = 0.293; visit 2: β = −0.10, 95% CI: −0.26 to 0.06, z = −1.20, p = 0.231; visit 3: β = −0.09, 95% CI: −0.25 to 0.07, z = −1.10, p = 0.271; visit 4: β = 0.11, 95% CI: −0.05 to 0.27, z = 1.41, p = 0.160), as shown in Table 7.

In patients with MPE, the percentage of pDCs decreased in both groups during the subacute phase. During the resolution phase, the percentage of pDCs increased in patients with immune abnormalities but decreased in those without immune abnormalities. At the final visit, the percentage of pDCs was significantly higher in patients with immune abnormalities than in patients without immune abnormalities (β = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.37, z = 2.19, p = 0.029; Figure 6, Table 7).

To assess model adequacy, residuals for Treg cells and pDCs from the GEE model were plotted against the control, MPE and DRESS/DIHS groups (Supplementary Fig. 1–4). Across all 3 groups, the residuals were approximately centered around 0, with no evidence of systematic bias. The spread of residuals was relatively consistent across groups, although a few outliers were observed.

Discussion

The pathogenesis of DRESS/DIHS remains complex and incompletely understood. Dysregulation of the immune response, particularly T cell-mediated immunity, plays a crucial role in the onset and progression of the disease. This study demonstrated a significant reduction in the mean percentages of Treg cells and pDCs during the acute stage of both DRESS/DIHS and MPE compared with healthy subjects. However, Treg cells showed a progressive increase toward the resolution phase in both conditions, whereas pDCs continued to decrease toward the resolution phase. After discontinuation of systemic steroids in DRESS/DIHS, both Treg cells and pDCs demonstrated a progressive increase. Nevertheless, Treg cell levels were significantly higher than those in the control group, while pDC levels remained significantly lower than those in the control group. No significant differences were observed in Treg cells or pDCs between patients with and without immune abnormalities in both DRESS/DIHS and MPE, except for pDCs during the resolution phase in MPE. These findings enhance our understanding of the immunological alterations associated with DRESS/DIHS, highlighting the dynamic changes in Treg cells and pDCs across different stages of the disease and its treatment.

Treg cells play a crucial role in maintaining immunological tolerance to both self and foreign antigens, preventing autoimmunity and controlling inflammation.3, 4 In a previous study, significantly increased frequencies of Treg cells were observed during the acute stage of DRESS/DIHS compared with healthy controls and the resolution phase; however, this pattern was not observed in  toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) or MPE.5 In contrast, our study revealed a significant reduction in the number of Treg cells during the acute stage of both DRESS/DIHS and MPE compared with healthy subjects and the resolution phase. Moreover, no significant differences in Treg cell numbers were observed between patients with DRESS/DIHS or MPE who had immune abnormalities and those without. This discrepancy may be attributable to differences in the ethnic backgrounds of the study populations, which could influence immune response development. During acute inflammation, various soluble mediators, such as cytokines, acute-phase proteins, and chemokines, are released, promoting the migration of inflammatory cells to the site of inflammation.9 Previous studies have shown that Treg cells are significantly more abundant in the skin lesions of patients with DRESS/DIHS compared with those with TEN, graft-versus-host disease, and MPE.5, 10 Another recent study demonstrated that Treg cells become highly migratory during the first 3 days of skin inflammation, leading to increased Treg abundance in the dermis. Subsequently, Treg levels return to baseline by day 6.11 This migratory behavior may account for the reduced number of circulating Treg cells observed during the acute phase of DRESS/DIHS and MPE, as these cells are recruited to suppress cutaneous inflammation. Our study demonstrated a progressive increase in circulating Treg cells during the subacute phase (approx. 1 week after the acute stage) in both DRESS/DIHS and MPE, which aligns with the reported timeframe of normalized Treg migratory behavior. Furthermore, circulating Treg cell levels continued to rise during the resolution phase and following discontinuation of systemic corticosteroids in patients with DRESS/DIHS. Glucocorticoids exert complex effects on T cells, both promoting and suppressing T-cell-mediated immunity depending on the immunological context.12 Previous reports have shown that glucocorticoids can induce the expansion of Treg cells in autoimmune conditions, including systemic lupus erythematosus, immune thrombocytopenic purpura, and asthma, as well as in healthy individuals receiving long-term dexamethasone treatment.13 This suggests that the expansion of Treg cells in the post-acute stage of DRESS/DIHS may result from the resolution of inflammation, glucocorticoid therapy, or a combination of both. The expansion of Treg cells likely plays a pivotal role in limiting disease progression and severity, while also preventing the subsequent development of autoimmunity.

Plasmacytoid dendritic cells represent a distinct subset of dendritic cells that specialize in the production and secretion of large amounts of type I interferons (IFNs). They play a crucial role in antiviral immunity and also contribute to the development of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. The association between DRESS/DIHS and HHV-6 reactivation suggests the potential involvement of pDCs in the pathogenesis of this condition. A previous study reported a significant decrease in circulating pDCs around 3–4 weeks after the onset of DRESS/DIHS, with frequencies lower than those in patients with MPE and healthy subjects.8 Another study found decreased frequencies of circulating pDCs during the initial 1–2 weeks of disease onset in DRESS/DIHS compared to MPE patients.7 Our results were consistent with these findings, demonstrating a significant reduction in the mean percentage of pDCs from the acute stage through the resolution phase (3 weeks after the initial presentation) in patients with DRESS/DIHS compared with healthy controls. This reduction in pDCs during the acute stage may be attributable to their migration and infiltration into skin lesions, a phenomenon observed in inflammatory skin diseases such as cutaneous lupus erythematosus and psoriasis.14 Additionally, a previous study reported higher pDC detection in the dermis of patients with DRESS/DIHS compared with those with MPE and healthy subjects.8 Unlike Treg cells, our study did not identify significant differences in the percentage of pDCs between DRESS/DIHS and MPE from the acute through the resolution phases, except after discontinuation of systemic steroids in DRESS/DIHS. Notably, glucocorticoids have been shown to significantly reduce IFN-α production and decrease the number of circulating pDCs.15, 16 These effects are reversible and typically return to baseline within days after steroid cessation.15, 16 During inflammatory periods, the reduction in circulating pDCs likely serves to limit inflammation and promote clinical immunosuppression. This dynamic interplay underscores the complexity of the immunological mechanisms involved in DRESS/DIHS and highlights the role of pDCs in modulating the immune response.

Notably, our study did not identify significant differences in the percentages of Treg cells and pDCs between DRESS/DIHS and MPE from the acute to the resolution phase, which contrasts with findings from previous studies.5, 8 This discrepancy may be attributable to the small sample size of our study or to the lack of assessment of HHV-6 reactivation in patients with DRESS/DIHS. Further investigations incorporating larger cohorts and systematic evaluation of HHV-6 reactivation are warranted to achieve a more comprehensive understanding of the immunological differences between DRESS/DIHS and MPE.

Limitations

This study had some limitations. First, the number of participants in the study was relatively small, as this was a pilot study, and sample size calculation was not performed. Second, the functions and subsets of circulating Treg cells and pDCs were not examined. Third, skin biopsies to evaluate the numbers and functions of Treg cells and pDCs were not conducted. Lastly, reactivation of HHV-6, cytomegalovirus, and EBV was not evaluated in this study. However, this study successfully monitored dynamic changes in the numbers of Treg cells and pDCs throughout the course of DRESS/DIHS and MPE. Further studies assessing HHV reactivation and incorporating genetic testing may enhance the understanding of disease pathogenesis.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated the dynamic interplay between Treg cells and pDCs in the pathogenesis of DRESS/DIHS and MPE. The acute stage of both conditions exhibited a significant decrease in Treg cells and pDCs, suggesting their potential involvement in immune dysregulation during disease onset. However, Treg cells showed a significant increase in the resolution phase of both DRESS/DIHS and MPE, while pDCs continued to decrease until the resolution phase in both conditions. This suggests that Treg cells are likely to play a crucial role in preventing further inflammation in both DRESS/DIHS and MPE.

Supplementary data

The supplementary materials are available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15682125. The package contains the following files:

Supplementary Fig. 1. Residuals of Treg cells from the GEE model across the 3 groups at each visit.

Supplementary Fig. 2. Residuals of Treg cells from the GEE model at each visit, comparing patients with and without immune abnormalities across MPE and DRESS/DISH groups.

Supplementary Fig. 3. Residuals of pDCs from the GEE model across the 3 groups at each visit.

Supplementary Fig. 4. Residuals of pDCs from the GEE model at each visit, comparing patients with and without immune abnormalities across MPE and DRESS/DISH groups.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets supporting the findings of the current study are openly available in Zenodo at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14210150.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Use of AI and AI-assisted technologies

Not applicable.

Tables


Table 1. Baseline characteristics of DRESS/DIHS patients, MPE patients, and healthy subjects

Factors

DRESS/DIHS

9

MPE

8

Control

5

p-value

Age [years]

Min

Q1

Median

Q3

Max

21

30

47

58

69

24

36.5

47.5

60

67

25

26

38

46

58

0.602

(H = 1.02, df = 2)

Male sex, n (%)

5 (55.6)

5 (62.5)

2 (40.0)

0.864

Comorbidities, n (%)

HIV

AOID

UCNTD

4 (44.4)

2 (22.2)

1 (11.1)

1 (11.1)

5 (62.5)

3 (37.5)

2 (25)

0.637

Duration of onset [days]

Min

Q1

Median

Q3

Max

14

14

21

28

35

5

6

9

11

14

<0.001

(z = −3.32)

Causative drugs, n (%)

Cotrimoxazole

Anti-TB drugs

Phenytoin

Efavirenz

Vancomycin

Clarithromycin

9 (100)

4 (44.4)

3 (33.3)

2 (22.2)

8 (100)

2 (25)

2 (25)

2 (25)

1 (12.5)

1 (12.5)

0.328

RegiSCAR score

Min

Q1

Median

Q3

Max

6

6

6

7

8

AOID – adult-onset immunodeficiency; DRESS/DIHS – drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome; HIV – human immunodeficiency virus; MPE – maculopapular drug eruption; UCNTD – undifferentiated connective tissue disease; RegiSCAR – European Registry of Severe Cutaneous Adverse Reactions; Min – minimal value; Max – maximal value; Q1 – 1st quartile; Q3 – 3rd quartile; H – value of the test statistic of the Kruskal–Wallis test; df – degrees of freedom; z – value of the Mann–Whitney U test.
Table 2. The percentage of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells) and the percentage of CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) in healthy subjects, patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE), and patients with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS) at the different time points

Factors

Control

n = 5

DRESS/DIHS

n = 9

MPE

n = 8

%Treg cells

5.41 (1.55)

Visit 1 acute phase

3.31 (0.92)

3.31 (1.09)

Visit 2 subacute phase

5.47 (1.70)

6.58 (0.66)

Visit 3 resolution phase

6.29 (1.23)

6.54 (1.09)

Visit 4 systemic steroid cessation

7.47 (1.91)

%pDCs

1.04 (0.21)

Visit 1 acute phase

0.37 (0.12)

0.48 (0.09)

Visit 2 subacute phase

0.33 (0.09)

0.33 (0.11)

Visit 3 resolution phase

0.35 (0.13)

0.39 (0.12)

Visit 4 systemic steroid cessation

0.84 (0.27)

Data are presented as mean (standard deviation (SD)) because they were normally distributed and used in the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model with multiple comparisons.
Table 3. Comparisons of the percentage of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells) in healthy subjects, patients with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS), and patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE) at the different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, visit 3 – resolution phase, and visit 4 – systemic steroid cessation

Comparisons

Coefficient

95% CI

z-value

p-value

DRESS/DIHS

Visit 1: vs healthy

−2.10

−3.44, −0.75

−3.05

0.002

Visit 2–visit 1

2.16

0.97, 3.35

3.56

<0.001

Visit 3–visit 1

2.97

1.79, 4.16

4.91

<0.001

Visit 3–visit 2

0.82

−0.37, 2.00

1.35

0.178

Visit 4–visit 1

4.14

2.92, 5.36

6.66

<0.001

Visit 4–visit 2

1.99

0.77, 3.21

3.19

0.001

Visit 4–visit 3

1.17

−0.05, 2.39

1.88

0.060

Visit 4: vs healthy

2.05

0.67, 3.42

2.92

0.003

Visit 1: DRESS/DIHS-MPE

0.003

−1.17, 1.18

0.01

0.996

Visit 2: DRESS/DIHS-MPE

−1.11

−2.28, 0.06

−1.85

0.064

Visit 3: DRESS/DIHS-MPE

−0.25

−1.42, 0.92

−0.42

0.673

MPE

Visit 1: vs healthy

−2.10

−3.47, −0.72

−2.99

0.003

Visit 2–visit 1

3.27

2.01, 4.53

5.09

<0.001

Visit 3–visit 1

3.23

1.97, 4.49

5.03

<0.001

Visit 3–visit 2

−0.04

−1.30, 1.22

−0.06

0.949

95% CI – 95% confidence interval. All comparisons were performed using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) with multiple comparisons.
Table 4. The percentage of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells) and the percentage of CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) in patients with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS) and patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE) at different time points and with different immune status

Factors

DRESS/DIHS

n = 9

MPE

n = 8

without immune abnormalities (n = 5)

immune abnormalities (n = 4)

without immune abnormalities (n = 3)

immune abnormalities (n = 5)

%Treg cells

Visit 1 acute phase

3.75 (0.98)

2.77 (0.53)

2.86 (1.27)

3.58 (1.01)

Visit 2 subacute phase

5.10 (1.90)

5.94 (1.56)

6.68 (0.63)

6.52 (0.74)

Visit 3 resolution phase

6.03 (1.42)

6.61 (1.03)

5.70 (1.04)

7.04 (0.84)

Visit 4 systemic steroid cessation

7.70 (1.56)

7.17 (2.24)

%pDCs

Visit 1 acute phase

0.33 (0.12)

0.42 (0.13)

0.53 (0.05)

0.44 (0.10)

Visit 2 subacute phase

0.37 (0.10)

0.28 (0.05)

0.29 (0.13)

0.36 (0.10)

Visit 3 resolution phase

0.39 (0.10)

0.30 (0.15)

0.26 (0.08)

0.45 (0.06)

Visit 4 systemic steroid cessation

0.79 (0.31)

0.91 (0.18)

Data are presented as mean (standard deviation (SD)) because they were normally distributed and used in the generalized estimating equation (GEE) model with multiple comparisons.
Table 5. Comparisons of the percentage of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells) in patient with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS) with and without immune abnormalities at different time points and patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE) with and without immune abnormalities at different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, visit 3 – resolution phase, and visit 4 – systemic steroid cessation

Comparisons

Coefficient

95% CI

z-value

p-value

DRESS/DIHS

with IA vs without IA

Visit 1

−0.98

−2.48, 0.52

−1.28

0.200

Visit 2

0.84

−0.66, 2.34

1.10

0.271

Visit 3

0.59

−0.91, 2.08

0.77

0.444

Visit 4

−0.53

−2.02, 0.97

−0.69

0.491

MPE

with IA vs without IA

Visit 1

0.72

−0.91, 2.35

0.87

0.384

Visit 2

−0.15

−1.78, 1.48

−0.18

0.853

Visit 3

1.34

−0.29, 2.97

1.61

0.106

IA – immune abnormalities; 95% CI – 95% confidence interval. All comparisons were performed using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) with multiple comparisons.
Table 6. Comparisons of the percentage of CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) in healthy subjects, patients with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS), and patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE) at different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, visit 3 – resolution phase, and visit 4 – systemic steroid cessation

Comparisons

Coefficient

95% CI

z-value

p-value

DRESS/DIHS

Visit 1: vs healthy

−0.67

−0.83, −0.52

−8.64

<0.001

Visit 2–visit 1

−0.04

−0.16, 0.09

−0.58

0.559

Visit 3–visit 1

−0.02

−0.14, 0.11

−0.25

0.804

Visit 3–visit 2

0.02

−0.11, 0.15

0.33

0.738

Visit 4–visit 1

0.47

0.34, 0.60

7.05

<0.001

Visit 4–visit 2

0.51

0.38, 0.64

7.62

<0.001

Visit 4–visit 3

0.49

0.36, 0.62

7.30

<0.001

Visit 4: vs healthy

−0.20

−0.36, −0.04

−2.52

0.012

Visit 1: DRESS/DIHS-MPE

−0.11

−0.24, 0.03

−1.58

0.115

Visit 2: DRESS/DIHS-MPE

0.0003

−0.13, 0.133

0.00

0.996

Visit 3: DRESS/DIHS-MPE

−0.03

−0.16, 0.11

−0.39

0.696

MPE

Visit 1: vs healthy

−0.66

−0.72, −0.41

−7.11

<0.001

Visit 2–visit 1

−0.15

−0.28, −0.01

−2.11

0.035

Visit 3–visit 1

−0.10

−0.24, 0.04

−1.40

0.160

Visit 3–visit 2

0.05

−0.09, 0.18

0.71

0.480

95% CI – 95% confidence interval. All comparisons were performed using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) with multiple comparisons.
Table 7. Comparisons of the percentage of CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) in patients with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS) with and without immune abnormalities at different time points and patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE) with and without immune abnormalities at the different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, visit 3 – resolution phase, and visit 4 – systemic steroid cessation

Comparisons

Coefficient

95% CI

z-value

p-value

DRESS/DIHS

with IA vs without IA

Visit 1

0.09

−0.07, 0.25

1.05

0.293

Visit 2

−0.10

−0.26, 0.06

−1.20

0.231

Visit 3

−0.09

−0.25, 0.07

−1.10

0.271

Visit 4

0.11

−0.05, 0.27

1.41

0.160

MPE

with IA vs without IA

Visit 1

−0.09

−0.07, 0.25

1.05

0.293

Visit 2

0.07

−0.10, 0.25

0.81

0.416

Visit 3

0.19

0.05, 0.37

2.19

0.029

Visit 4

IA – immune abnormalities; 95% CI – 95% confidence interval. All comparisons were performed using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) with multiple comparisons.

Figures


Fig. 1. The percentage of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells) in healthy subjects (control: n = 5), patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE, n = 8), and patients with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS, n = 9) at different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, visit 3 – resolution phase, and visit 4 – systemic steroids cessation. A significantly low percentage of Treg cells was observed in the acute stage of DRESS/DIHS and MPE. However, the percentage of Treg increased significantly in the subacute to the resolution phase of DRESS/DIHS and MPE when compared to the acute stage. Post-systemic steroid cessation in DRESS/DIHS, the percentage of Treg cells continued rising and was significantly higher than in the control group. No significant differences were detected between the DRESS/DIHS and MPE groups. The data were analyzed as the mean of percentages. All comparisons were computed using a generalized estimating equation (GEE) with multiple comparisons
** p < 0.001 between the DRESS/DIHS group; †† p < 0.001 between the MPE group, mean difference between the MPE vs healthy subject at visit 1; p = 0.003, mean difference between the DRESS/DIHS group vs healthy subjects at visit 1; p = 0.002, mean difference between the DRESS/DIHS group at visit 4 vs healthy subjects; p = 0.003.
Fig. 2. The percentage of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells) in drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS) patients without immune abnormalities (n = 5) and with immune abnormalities (n = 4) at different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, visit 3 – resolution phase, and visit 4 – systemic steroids cessation. A trend of continuously increasing percentage of Treg cells was observed in both groups during each visit. No significant differences were observed between the 2 groups in each visit
Fig. 3. The percentage of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells (Treg cells) in maculopapular drug eruption patients without immune abnormalities (n = 3) and with immune abnormalities (n = 5) at different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, and visit 3 – resolution phase. An increasing percentage of Treg cells was observed in both groups during the subacute phase. In the resolution phase, the percentage of Treg cells increased in patients with immune abnormalities, while it decreased in patients without immune abnormalities, but there was no statistical significance
Fig. 4. The percentage of CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) in healthy subjects (control: n = 5), patients with maculopapular drug eruption (MPE, n = 8), and patients with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS, n = 9) at different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, visit 3 – resolution phase, and visit 4 – systemic steroids cessation. The percentage of pDCs significantly decreased in the acute stage of both DRESS/DIHS and MPE compared to the control group. Moreover, the percentage of pDCs was significantly lower in the subacute phase of MPE compared to the acute stage, while no significant difference was found in DRESS/DIHS. No significant differences were observed during the subacute to resolution phases of both DRESS/DIHS and MPE. Although the percentage of pDCs increased significantly after systemic steroid cessation in DRESS/DIHS, it was still significantly lower than in the control group. No significant differences were detected between the DRESS/DIHS and MPE groups. The data were analyzed as the mean of percentages; all comparisons were calculated with a generalized estimating equation (GEE) with multiple comparisons
**p < 0.001, mean difference between acute and subacute phase in patients with MPE (p = 0.035), mean difference after discontinuing systemic steroid and healthy controls (p = 0.012).
Fig. 5. The percentage of CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) in drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms/drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome (DRESS/DIHS) patients without immune abnormalities (n = 5) and with immune abnormalities (n = 4) at different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, visit 3 – resolution phase, and visit 4 – systemic steroids cessation. A decreasing percentage of pDCs was observed in patients with immune abnormalities during the subacute to resolution phase, while the percentage of pDCs tended to increase in patients without immune abnormalities. The percentage of pDCs increased significantly after systemic steroid cessation in both groups. No significant differences were detected between both groups
Fig. 6. The percentage of CD123+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) in maculopapular drug eruption patients without immune abnormalities (n = 3) and with immune abnormalities (n = 5) at different time points: visit 1 – acute phase, visit 2 – subacute phase, and visit 3 resolution phase. A decreasing percentage of pDCs was observed in both groups during the subacute phase. In the resolution phase, the percentage of pDCs increased in patients with immune abnormalities, while it decreased in patients without immune abnormalities. This change was significant in the resolution phase

References (16)

  1. Kroshinsky D, Cardones ARG, Blumenthal KG. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. N Engl J Med. 2024;391(23):2242–2254. doi:10.1056/NEJMra2204547
  2. Cho YT, Yang CW, Chu CY. Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS): An interplay among drugs, viruses, and immune system. Int J Mol Sci. 2017;18(6):1243. doi:10.3390/ijms18061243
  3. Vignali DAA, Collison LW, Workman CJ. How regulatory T cells work. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(7):523–532. doi:10.1038/nri2343
  4. Grover P, Goel PN, Greene MI. Regulatory T cells: Regulation of identity and function. Front Immunol. 2021;12:750542. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.750542
  5. Takahashi R, Kano Y, Yamazaki Y, Kimishima M, Mizukawa Y, Shiohara T. Defective regulatory T cells in patients with severe drug eruptions: Timing of the dysfunction is associated with the pathological phenotype and outcome. J Immunol. 2009;182(12):8071–8079. doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0804002
  6. Ye Y, Gaugler B, Mohty M, Malard F. Plasmacytoid dendritic cell biology and its role in immune-mediated diseases. Clin Transl Immunol. 2020;9(5):e1139. doi:10.1002/cti2.1139
  7. Hsu SH, Yang CW, Hsieh YC, et al. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells diminution in peripheral blood is prevalent in drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms and may precede human herpesvirus 6 reactivation. Dermatol Sin. 2021;39(4):175–181. doi:10.4103/ds.ds_37_21
  8. Sugita K, Tohyama M, Watanabe H, et al. Fluctuation of blood and skin plasmacytoid dendritic cells in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2010;126(2):408–410. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2010.06.004
  9. Hannoodee S, Nasuruddin DN. Acute inflammatory response. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island, USA: StatPearls Publishing; 2025:Bookshelf ID: NBK556083. PMID:32310543.
  10. Morito H, Ogawa K, Fukumoto T, et al. Increased ratio of FoxP3+ regulatory T cells/CD3+ T cells in skin lesions in drug-induced hypersensitivity syndrome/drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2014;39(3):284–291. doi:10.1111/ced.12246
  11. Norman MU, Chow Z, Snelgrove SL, Prakongtham P, Hickey MJ. Dynamic regulation of the molecular mechanisms of regulatory T cell migration in inflamed skin. Front Immunol. 2021;12:655499. doi:10.3389/fimmu.2021.655499
  12. Taves MD, Ashwell JD. Glucocorticoids in T cell development, differentiation and function. Nat Rev Immunol. 2021;21(4):233–243. doi:10.1038/s41577-020-00464-0
  13. Cari L, De Rosa F, Nocentini G, Riccardi C. Context-dependent effect of glucocorticoids on the proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis of regulatory T cells: A review of the empirical evidence and clinical applications. Int J Mol Sci. 2019;20(5):1142. doi:10.3390/ijms20051142
  14. Dias De Oliveira NF, Santi CG, Maruta CW, Aoki V. Plasmacytoid dendritic cells in dermatology. An Bras Dermatol. 2021;96(1):76–81. doi:10.1016/j.abd.2020.08.006
  15. Shodell M, Siegal FP. Corticosteroids depress IFN-α-producing plasmacytoid dendritic cells in human blood. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108(3):446–448. doi:10.1067/mai.2001.117928
  16. Shodell M, Shah K, Siegal FP. Circulating human plasmacytoid dendritic cells are highly sensitive to corticosteroid administration. Lupus. 2003;12(3):222–230. doi:10.1191/0961203303lu362xx