Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 2.1 (5-Year IF – 2.0)
Journal Citation Indicator (JCI) (2023) – 0.4
Scopus CiteScore – 3.7 (CiteScore Tracker – 4.0)
Index Copernicus  – 171.00; MNiSW – 70 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2021, vol. 30, nr 8, August, p. 789–795

doi: 10.17219/acem/135980

Publication type: original article

Language: English

License: Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported (CC BY 3.0)

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

Cite as:


Nie C, Meng G, Wu Y, et al. Expression of miR-9a-5p in cirrhosis patients with recurrent portal hypertension after treatment. Adv Clin Exp Med. 2021;30(8):789–795. doi:10.17219/acem/135980

Expression of miR-9a-5p in cirrhosis patients with recurrent portal hypertension after treatment

Cuifang Nie1,A,B,C,E,F, Guangju Meng1,A,C,D,E,F, Yongyun Wu1,A,E,F, Li Liu1,2,A,B,C,F, Li Chen1,B,C,D,E, Shengqiang Yang1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Yan Hu1,A,B,E,F

1 Department of Infectious Disease, Tai’an Central Hospital, China

2 Shanghai Key Laboratory of Tuberculosis, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, China

Abstract

Background. MicroRNA (miR) influences the biological activities of cirrhotic patients with recurrent portal hypertension.

Objectives. The current study was designed to investigate risk factors related to the survival of cirrhosis patients and assessed the possibility of using miR-9a-5p predictability to prevent post-treatment portal hypertension.

Materials and methods. Patients with portal hypertension due to liver cirrhosis treated from January 2015 to September 2016 were included in this study. Patients without relapse after treatment were selected as the success group while patients with relapse after treatment were selected as the recurrence group. Serum samples from healthy people were also collected. The blood indexes of the 2 groups of patients before and after treatment were compared and the miR-9a-5p serum level in each group was determined. The Kaplan–Meier method was applied to analyze three-year survival, Cox univariate regression was used to analyze the risk factors for recurrence of cirrhotic portal hypertension, and the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic value of serum miR-9a-5p, total bilirubin (TBIL) and platelet (PLT) levels in patients with recurrence.

Results. The miR-9a-5p level in the recurrence group was higher than that in the success group after treatment. In patients with recurrence, the miR-9a-5p level was negatively correlated with red blood cell count, TBIL, white blood cell count, and PLT count, and positively correlated with albumin. The miR-9a-5p, TBIL and PLT are potential markers of recurrent portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis. The miR-9a-5p had the highest area under the curve (AUC) value in patients with relapse.

Conclusions. The miR-9a-5p is a risk factor for the recurrence of cirrhotic portal hypertension after treatment. It may be used as a marker of recurrence, and so has potential clinical value for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent portal hypertension.

Key words: miR-9a-5p, liver cirrhosis, portal hypertension, recurrence, risk factor

Background

Liver cirrhosis is a common and chronic liver disease that is caused by extensive fibrosis secondary to long-term liver cell inflammation and necrosis accompanied by the formation of pseudolobules and regenerative nodules, which deform and harden the liver.1 The main causes of cirrhosis are viral hepatitis – a few cases of which are schistosomiasis cirrhosis – alcoholism, autoimmune conditions, and Budd–Chiari syndrome.2, 3 The disease progresses slowly and has no visible symptoms. Most patients have mild or no symptoms that can be relieved by rest. However, once liver function is decompensated, the symptoms become more obvious, and are mainly manifested as liver function decline and portal hypertension.4, 5 The clinical manifestation of cirrhotic portal hypertension is usually the opening of the communicating branch of the portal systemic vein, which results in a large amount of portal vein blood directly entering systemic circulation before entering the liver, resulting in venous dilatation, hypersplenism, splenomegaly, and ascites in the esophagus and abdominal wall.6, 7 Dilatation of the esophageal and gastric fundus veins can occur in severe cases. If rupture occurs, the patient will suffer from severe upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, which endangers their life.8 Massive hemorrhage of the digestive tract caused by rupture of collateral circulation of portal body is one of the main causes of death in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis. Zhao et al. reported that the death rate after the first hemorrhage is about 20%, and the rebleeding rate can reach 45% within 24 h after hemorrhage, and is as high as 75% within 1 year.7 If untreated, about 60% of patients suffer from rebleeding within 1–2 years after the first hemorrhage.9, 10 The most effective treatment for cirrhotic portal hypertension in patients complicated with esophageal and gastric varices bleeding is a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS), which is minimally invasive and can effectively reduce the pressure of the portal vein. However, due to hemodynamic changes after TIPS and mechanical damage during the operation, complications such as liver function damage, hepatic encephalopathy and long-term stent stenosis may occur after TIPS.11, 12

MicroRNA (miR), which is a kind of non-coding RNA containing approx. 22 nucleotides that is widely distributed in organisms, regulates the biological functions of cells by binding to target mRNA 3’UTR to inhibit translation.13 MicroRNA has been found to play a role in many diseases including viral hepatitis,14 liver fibrosis15 and liver cancer.16 It can regulate differentiation, proliferation, apoptosis, metabolism, tumorigenesis, and other biological processes, and has gradually attracted attention in the field of molecular biology.17

Objectives

In order to explore the role of miR-9a-5p in cirrhosis patients with recurrent portal hypertension after treatment, this study assessed miR-9a-5p levels in recurrent patients to explore three-year survival, identify risk factors related to survival, and discuss the possibility of using miR-9a-5p to predict the recurrence of liver cirrhosis portal hypertension after treatment.

Materials and methods

General patient data

From January 2015 to September 2016, 42 patients (28 males and 14 females, aged 49.8 ±12.1 years) who did not relapse (successful operation) after treatment and 35 patients (23 males and 12 females, aged 50.1 ±11.5 years) who suffered from relapse (operation failure) after treatment were selected for TIPS treatment due to liver cirrhosis portal hypertension in our hospital (Tai’an Central Hospital, Tai’an, China). The general characteristics of the 2 groups before treatment were comparable. The success criteria for the TIPS operation are: 1. The portal pressure should be reduced to 12 mm Hg (16 cm H2O), or below 25% of the pressure for treatment of the anterior portal vein after the establishment of the hepatic vein (inferior vena cava of the hepatic segment) 2. Diversion between the portal veins should occur. The diagnostic criteria of shunt dysfunction in TIPS include any of the following signs indicating that shunt dysfunction may be present: 1) ultrasound indicates that the shunt blood flow velocity is >200 cm/s, <50 cm/s or no blood flow, or the shunt diameter is <50%; and 2) recurrence of portal hypertension, i.e., hemorrhage and ascites of the esophagogastric vein after treatment. In all cases, portosystemic pressure gradient (PSG) exceeded 12 mm Hg (16 cm H2O). Suspected shunt dysfunction can only be diagnosed after the portal vein pressure exceeds 12 mm Hg, as determined using portal vein angiography. Data from 30 healthy people were collected during the same time to serve as a control group (18 males and 12 females, aged 50.3 ±10.8 years). All patients and healthy people participating in this study provided informed consent and the study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our institution.

Blood sample collection

Patients in each group received anticoagulants through the antecubital vein on an empty stomach in the morning. A blood sample was then collected and centrifuged at 4°C for 10 min at 3000 rpm. The upper serum was placed in a microcentrifuge tube sterilized with high pressure steam, centrifuged at 4°C for 15 min at 15,000 rpm, collected, divided into smaller samples, and stored in a refrigerator at 4°C.

Quantitative polymerase chain reaction

Serum samples frozen at −80°C were thawed at room temperature. Each microcentrifuge tube contained 100 μL of serum. Total RNA was extracted from serum according to the instructions of the miRNeasy Mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). The concentration and purity of total RNA at 260–280 nm were detected using an ultraviolet spectrophotometer. An OD260/OD280 ratio of 1.8–2.0 indicated acceptable RNA purity. According to the instructions of the reverse transcription kit (Qiagen), a 20 μL reaction system was constructed and reverse transcription was carried out using a Gene AmpPCR System 9700 (37°C for 60 min and 95°C for 5 min). The following miR-9a-5p and U6 primers were designed and synthesized by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China): miR-9a-5p: F: 5’- GGGTCTTTGGTTATCTAGCT-3’; R: 5’- ATCCAGTGCGTGTCGTGGA-3’, U6: 5’-GCTTCGGCAGCACATATACTAAAAT-3’; R:5’-CGCTTCACGAATTTGCGTGTCAT-3’. The PCR kit was purchased from Ribo Bio (Guangzhou, China), and 20 μL of the reaction system was prepared according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The standard three-step method was used: 95°C for 20 s, 95°C for 10 s, 60°C for 20 s, and 70°C for 10 s, for a total of 40 cycles. The serum miR-level was calculated using 2ΔΔCt method.

Patient follow-up

The non-recurrent group of patients visited the hospital for routine blood, liver function, kidney function, and hemagglutination testing at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after TIPS treatment, and then they were examined once a year. During this period, if the patients suffer from gastrointestinal hemorrhage or ascites, they should return to hospital for examination and treatment at any time. For the relapse group, patients were followed-up by nurses every 6 months through outpatient or telephone visits for 3 years.

Data analyses

IBM SPSS v. 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, USA) software was used for statistical analyses and GraphPad Prism v. 6 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, USA) software was used for visualizing the data. Measurement data are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD). Comparisons between groups were performed using the independent sample t-test, log rank test, and one-analysis of variance (ANOVA), and post hoc pair-wise comparisons were performed using the least significant difference (LSD) test. Count data are reported as n and comparisons were performed using the χ2 test. Receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis was applied to explore the diagnostic value of miR-9a-5p for patients with recurrent cirrhosis portal hypertension after treatment. Cox regression analysis was applied to test the risk factors for recurrence. All data were tested using two-tailed tests. A value of 95% was used for the confidence intervals (95% CI). A difference was considered to be statistically significant when p < 0.05.

Results

Comparison of general data of patients before and after treatment

There were no significant differences in the routine blood index, liver function index, renal function index, Child–Pugh score, or grading before treatment between the 2 groups. After treatment, the routine blood index, liver function index, renal function index, and Child–Pugh score of patients in the recurrence group were significantly lower than those in the success group (p < 0.05; Table 1, Table 2).

Expression of miR-9a-5p
and its influence on prognosis

Comparison of miR-9a-5p levels in patients with different Child–Pugh grades revealed higher levels in patients with liver cirrhosis than in controls, and it was expressed differentially by distinct high Child–Pugh grade (p < 0.05, Figure 1A). The miR-9a-5p level in the recurrence group was significantly higher than that in the success group after treatment (p < 0.05, Figure 1B). Combined with the expression level of miR-9a-5p in patients’ serum samples, the Kaplan–Meier method was applied to analyze the three-year survival of the 77 patients with liver cirrhosis portal hypertension (Figure 1C) and Cox univariate regression was used to test the risk factors of these patients. The results showed no significant difference in three-year survival between the high and low miR-9a-5p groups. Cox univariate analysis showed that miR-9a-5p, serum TBIL, PLT, Child–Pugh score before treatment, and hepatic encephalopathy before treatment were all risk factors for three-year survival in patients with recurrent cirrhotic portal hypertension.

Correlation between serum miR-9a-5p
and various indicators in recurrent patients

The miR-9a-5p levels in patients with recurrent liver cirrhosis portal hypertension were negatively correlated with red blood cell count, TBIL, white blood cell count, and PLT count, and positively correlated with albumin, as shown in Figure 2.

Evaluation of miR-9a-5p, TBIL, and PLT as diagnostic markers of recurrence

In order to determine whether miR-9a-5p, TBIL or PLT can be used as markers for the treatment of recurrent portal hypertension in cirrhosis, the ROC curves of miR-9a-5p, TBIL and PLT were constructed (Figure 3). The area under the curve (AUC) values of miR-9a-5p, TBIL and PLT were 0.8252, 0.8209 and 0.8040, respectively. The above results revealed that miR-9a-5p had the best diagnostic value (Table 3, Table 4).

Discussion

Cirrhosis, as a common liver disease, has a rising incidence rate.18 The liver function of patients with early cirrhosis is normal and there are no obvious clinical symptoms. However, patients with late cirrhosis may experience a portal vein pressure increase and other phenomena that induce portal hypertensive gastropathy, gastrointestinal hemorrhage and other complications. Liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension can further induce splenomegaly and hyperfunction.19 Although drug therapy can alleviate the disease to a certain extent, long-term medication use can lead to a drug withdrawal reaction, low hemostasis rate and other complications. Surgery is a commonly used method for clinical treatment of liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension, but the possibility of recurrence of portal hypertension is high due to the development of liver cirrhosis.20 Studies have shown that although microRNA accounts for only 2% of human genes, it regulates the expression of more than 30% of human genes, and is closely related to the occurrence and development of diseases. Clinically, miR-130a and miR-130b are helpful for the diagnosis and prognosis of liver cirrhosis and can be applied as a joint detection method for liver cirrhosis or for a general survey of liver cirrhosis.21

In the present study, miR-9a-5p in patients with recurrent cirrhosis and portal hypertension after treatment was studied. The results revealed higher miR-9a-5p serum levels in patients with recurrent cirrhosis and portal hypertension than in patients in the success group after treatment. Previous research has revealed that miR-9a-5p is enhanced in rats with liver fibrosis portal hypertension.22 The serum miR-9a-5p level in patients with recurrent liver cirrhosis portal hypertension showed a negative correlation with red blood cell count, TBIL, white blood cell count, and PLT count, and a positive correlation with albumin. About 1/3 of platelets in the normal blood system are stored in the spleen, while 50–90% of platelets in patients with cirrhosis are stored there; if metabolism of the spleen is enhanced, damage to blood cells is increased and the proliferation of monocytes and macrophages is over-activated, thus leading to a decreased PLT level in peripheral blood.23 Albumin plays a decisive role in maintaining blood volume and plasma colloid osmotic pressure. It can expand the blood volume, inhibit the aggregation of leukocyte components, reduce blood consistency, and improve blood flow, which are beneficial for tissue repair and the control of ascites formation. However, albumin also controls ascites and increases portal vein blood flow, thus increasing the risk of esophageal and gastric varices bleeding.24 Serum bilirubin is a metabolite of heme in hemoglobin and other heme proteins in macrophages or other reticuloendothelial cells and hepatocytes. Blood detection indexes include indirect bilirubin level (IBIL) combined with albumin in blood, and direct bilirubin level (DBIL) combined with glucuronic acid in liver. The increase in bilirubin is likely caused by a related increase in bilirubin production or issues with the uptake, binding or excretion of bilirubin.25 The miR-9a-5p, TBIL and PLT are potential markers for diagnosis of recurrent portal hypertension in liver cirrhosis. Previously, several investigations have found that platelet count is an independent factor affecting the survival rate of patients with refractory ascites.26 Therefore, PLT count is related to postoperative liver function and survival rate, and a higher PLT count is beneficial to liver function.27 In the present study, miR-9a-5p had the highest AUC value in patients with relapse.

Limitations

Although the most optimal care possible has been provided by the researchers during every step of this study, still some limitations exist.

This was a clinic-based study and only hematological analysis was carried out; therefore, futher investigation is required in this aspect. Due to time constraints, the collected sample size was not adequate to represent all patients’ characteristics. The result might be area-specific and might not necessarily represent the community scenario. Finally, the study might lack external validity.

Conclusions

Overall, by studying the expression of miR-9a-5p in the serum of patients with recurrent cirrhosis portal hypertension, this study has identified factors associated with recurrence after treatment of cirrhosis portal hypertension. The miR-9a-5p may be used as a marker of recurrence, and so has clear potential clinical value for the diagnosis and treatment of recurrent portal hypertension.

Tables


Table 1. General data of patients before treatment

Variable

Success group

(n = 42)

Recurrence group (n = 35)

χ2/t

p-value

Gender, n (%)

0.0077

0.9299

Male

28

23

Female

14

12

Age [years]

49.8 ±12.1

50.1 ±11.5

0.1108

0.9121

Red blood cell count [×1012/L]

4.46 ±1.86

4.39 ±1.91

0.1624

0.8713

White blood cell count [×109/L]

3.56 ±1.03

3.48 ±1.08

0.3269

0.7446

Platelet count [×109/L]

50.35 ±15.23

53.25 ±16.98

0.7896

0.4322

Albumin [g/L]

31.65 ±3.26

31.58 ±3.03

0.0969

0.9231

TBIL [μmol/L]

23.75 ±5.98

23.52 ±5.85

0.1697

0.8657

Alanine transaminase [U/L]

52.06 ±10.74

51.97 ±10.82

0.0365

0.9710

Thrombin activity [%]

60.03 ±8.26

59.56 ±8.74

0.2421

0.8093

INR

1.15 ±0.12

1.16 ±0.09

0.4067

0.6854

Blood creatinine [μmol/L]

59.8 ±2.96

58.7 ±3.12

1.5843

0.1173

Child–Pugh score

6.85 ±1.02

6.73 ±1.16

0.4829

0.6306

Child–Pugh grading (A/B/C)

32/10/0

26/7/0

0.0711

0.7897

TBIL – total bilirubin; INR – International Normalized Ratio.
Table 2. Comparison of indexes after treatment

Variable

Success group

(n = 42)

Recurrence group (n = 35)

χ2/t

p-value

Red blood cell count [×1012/L]

5.23 ±1.36

4.39 ±1.91

2.2482

0.0275

White blood cell count [×109/L]

8.06 ±1.75

3.48 ±1.08

13.4827

<0.0001

Platelet count [×109/L]

305.36 ±20.36

137.98 ±12.03

42.7823

<0.0001

Albumin [g/L]

23.85 ±3.72

28.63 ±3.16

6.0061

<0.0001

TBIL [μmol/L]

30.06 ±6.32

24.36 ±4.53

4.4631

<0.0001

Alanine transaminase [U/L]

41.05 ±5.23

49.85 ±10.82

4.6619

<0.0001

Thrombin activity [%]

78.69 ±8.03

64.26 ±7.84

7.9363

<0.0001

INR

1.89 ±0.36

1.30 ±0.18

8.8144

<0.0001

Blood creatinine [μmol/L]

55.3 ±1.29

58.7 ±2.85

6.9326

<0.0001

Child–Pugh score

6.03 ±0.71

6.89 ±1.05

4.2673

<0.0001

TBIL – total bilirubin; INR – International Normalized Ratio.
Table 3. Results of COX regression analysis

Variable

HR

95% CI

p-value

miR-9a-5p

1.032

1.001–1.062

0.034

Gender

1.385

0.921–2.052

0.192

Age

1.521

0.943–2.522

0.083

Serum TBIL

1.236

1.026–1.273

0.010

Platelet count

0.972

0.932–1.009

0.035

Child–Pugh score before treatment

1.125

1.001–1.043

0.027

HE before treatment

1.018

0.905–0.973

0.007

TBIL – total bilirubin; HE – hepatic encephalopathy; 95% CI – 95% confidence interval; HR – hazard ratio.
Table 4. Diagnostic value of miR-9a-5p, TBIL and PLT for recurrence of portal hypertension

Variable

AUC

SE

95% CI

p-value

miR-9a-5p

0.8252

0.052

0.7240–0.9263

<0.0001

TBIL

0.8209

0.049

0.7248–0.9170

<0.0001

PLT

0.8040

0.050

0.7050–0.9030

<0.0001

AUC – area under the curve, SE – standard error; 95% CI – 95% confidence interval; TBIL – total bilirubin; PLT – platelet level.

Figures


Fig. 1. Expression of miR-9a-5p and its relationship with prognosis. A. Expression of miR-9a-5p in serum of patients with different Child–Pugh grades; B. Expression of miR-9a-5p in serum of different groups of patients; C. Prognosis of patients with different miR-9a-5p expression levels
*** significant intergroup differences; p < 0.001
Fig. 2. Correlation between serum miR-9a-5p and various indexes in relapsed patients. A. Correlation between miR-9a-5p and red blood cell count; B. Correlation between miR-9a-5p and albumin; C. Correlation between miR-9a-5p and total bilirubin (TBIL); D. Correlation between miR-9a-5p and leukocyte count; E. Correlation between miR-9a-5p and platelet (PLT) count
Fig. 3. Use of miR-9a-5p, total bilirubin (TBIL) and platelet (PLT) for diagnosis of recurrence. A. Use of miR-9a-5p for diagnosis of recurrent patients; B. Use of TBIL for diagnosis of recurrent patients; C. Use of PLT for diagnosis of recurrent patients

References (27)

  1. Barnett R. Liver cirrhosis. Lancet. 2018;392(10144):275. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31659-3
  2. Nishikawa K, Osawa Y, Kimura K. Wnt/β-catenin signaling as a potential target for the treatment of liver cirrhosis using antifibrotic drugs. Int J Mol Sci. 2018;19(10):3103. doi:10.3390/ijms19103103
  3. Iliescu L, Toma L, Mercan-Stanciu A, et al. Budd–Chiari syndrome: Carious etiologies and imagistic findings. A pictorial review. Med Ultrason. 2019;21(3):344–348. doi:10.11152/mu-1921
  4. D’Amico G, Morabito A, D’Amico M, et al. Clinical states of cirrhosis and competing risks. J Hepatol. 2018;68(3):563–576. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.10.020
  5. Acharya C, Sahingur SE, Bajaj JS. Microbiota, cirrhosis, and the emerging oral–gut–liver axis. JCI Insight. 2017;2(19):e94416. doi:10.1172/jci.insight.94416
  6. Jiang XW, Gao F, Ma Y, Feng SF, Liu XL, Zhou HK. Percutaneous microwave ablation in the spleen for treatment of hypersplenism in cirrhosis patients. Dig Dis Sci. 2016;61(1):287–292. doi:10.1007/s10620-015-3732-7
  7. Zhao R, Lu J,Shi Y, Zhao H, Xu K, Sheng J. Current management of refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis. J Int Med Res. 2018;46(3):1138–1145. doi:10.1177/0300060517735231
  8. Zacharias AP, Jeyaraj R, Hobolth L, Bendtsen F, Gluud LL, Morgan MY. Carvedilol versus traditional, non-selective beta-blockers for adults with cirrhosis and gastroesophageal varices. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;10(10):CD011510. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD011510.pub2
  9. Moodley J, Lopez R, Carey W. Compliance with practice guidelines and risk of a first esophageal variceal hemorrhage in patients with cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;8(8):703–708. doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2010.02.022
  10. Sauerbruch T, Mengel M, Dollinger M, et al; German Study Group for Prophylaxis of Variceal Rebleeding. Prevention of rebleeding from esophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis receiving small-diameter stents versus hemodynamically controlled medical therapy. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(3):660-8.e1. doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2015.05.011
  11. Lv Y, Zuo L, Zhu X, et al. Identifying optimal candidates for early TIPS among patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding: A multicentre observational study. Gut. 2019;68(7):1297–1310. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317057
  12. Qi X, Han G, Fan D. Management of portal vein thrombosis in liver cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;11(7):435–446. doi:10.1038/nrgastro.2014.36
  13. Lu TX, Rothenberg ME. MicroRNA. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2018;141:1202–1207. doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2017.08.034
  14. Yang X, Li H, Sun H, et al. Hepatitis B virus-encoded miRNA controls viral replication. J Virol. 2017:91(10):e01919-16. doi:10.1128/JVI.01919-16
  15. Chen J, Yu Y, Li S, et al. MicroRNA-30a ameliorates hepatic fibrosis by inhibiting beclin1-mediated autophagy. J Cell Mol Med. 2017;21(12):3679–3692. doi:10.1111/jcmm.13278
  16. Sandbothe M, Buurman R, Reich N, et al. The microRNA-449 family inhibits TGF-β-mediated liver cancer cell migration by targeting SOX4. J Hepatol. 2017;66(5):1012–1021. doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2017.01.004
  17. Acunzo M, Romano G, Wernicke D, Croce CM. MicroRNA and cancer: A brief overview. Adv Biol Regul. 2015;57:1–9. doi:10.1016/j.jbior.2014.09.013
  18. Ascione T, Di Flumeri G, Boccia G, De Caro F. Infections in patients affected by liver cirrhosis: An update. Infez Med. 2017;25(2):91–97. PMID:28603226
  19. Dunne RM, Shyn PB, Sung JC, et al. Percutaneous treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with cirrhosis: A comparison of the safety of cryoablation and radiofrequency ablation. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(4):632–638. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.01.007
  20. Reverter E, Lozano JJ, Alonso C, et al. Metabolomics discloses potential biomarkers to predict the acute HVPG response to propranolol in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2019;39(4):705–713. doi:10.1111/liv.14042
  21. Lu L, Wang J, Lu H, et al. MicroRNA-130a and -130b enhance activation of hepatic stellate cells by suppressing PPARγ expression: A rat fibrosis model study. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;465:387–393. doi:10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.08.012
  22. Qi F, Hu JF, Liu BH, et al. MiR-9a-5p regulates proliferation and migration of hepatic stellate cells under pressure through inhibition of Sirt1. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(34):9900–9915. doi:10.3748/wjg.v21.i34.9900
  23. Bucsics T, Hoffman S, Grünberger J, et al. ePTFE-TIPS vs repetitive LVP plus albumin for the treatment of refractory ascites in patients with cirrhosis. Liver Int. 2018;38(6):1036–1044. doi:10.1111/liv.13615
  24. Ruohoniemi DM, Taslakian B, Aaltonen EA, et al. Comparative analysis of safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with and without pre-existing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(3):409–415. doi:10.1016/j.jvir.2019.11.020
  25. Allegretti AS, Frenk NE, Li DK, et al. Evaluation of model performance to predict survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt placement. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0217442. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0217442
  26. Wang J, Zhang M, Zhou T, Zhao S, Zhenguo S, Liu X. Role of platelet infiltration as independent prognostic marker for gastric adenocarcinomas. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34(8):e23320. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23320
  27. Zhang F, Zhuge Y, Zou X, et al. Different scoring systems in predicting survival in Chinese patients with liver cirrhosis undergoing trans­jugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;26(8):853–860. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000000134