Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Title abbreviation: Adv Clin Exp Med
JCR Impact Factor (IF) – 1.736
5-Year Impact Factor – 2.135
Index Copernicus  – 168.52
MEiN – 70 pts

ISSN 1899–5276 (print)
ISSN 2451-2680 (online)
Periodicity – monthly

Download original text (EN)

Advances in Clinical and Experimental Medicine

2018, vol. 27, nr 1, January, p. 71–75

doi: 10.17219/acem/67947

Publication type: original article

Language: English

Download citation:

  • BIBTEX (JabRef, Mendeley)
  • RIS (Papers, Reference Manager, RefWorks, Zotero)

The relationship between QDASH scale and clinical, electrophysiological findings in carpal tunnel syndrome

Yasemin Eren1,A,B,C,D,E,F, Neşe Güngör Yavasoglu2,B,C,D,F, Selim Selcuk Comoglu2,C,D,E,F

1 Department of Neurology, Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey

2 Neurology Clinic, Ankara Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Education and Research Hospital, Turkey

Abstract

Background. Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) occurs as a result of compression of the median nerve at the wrist. The Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire is a selfadministered region-specific outcome instrument which measures symptom severity and functional status.
Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and electrophysiological relationship with QDASH scale in CTS.
Material and Methods. The study included 99 females and 22 males in total out of 121 idiopathic CTS patients with the mean age of 47.9 ±9.5 years. Patients were divided clinically and electrophysiologically into 2 groups as severe and mild based on modified criteria defined by Italian CTS working group. Pain severity was evaluated by visual analog scale (VAS). Patients were evaluated functionally by QDASH scale and the relationship between clinical and electrophysiological effect intensity (degree) was examined.
Results. QDASH scores were found significantly high in female patients, in patients with long disease duration (6 years and more), patients with clinically severe symptoms, and the ones with positive phalen test in both hands. Statistically significant positive relationship was found between QDASH scores, disease duration and clinical severity. However, no relationship was found between electrophysiological severity and QDASH. A mild and positive correlation was observed among disease duration, clinical severity and VAS. A small and positive correlation was detected between VAS and QDASH.
Conclusion. Although electrophysiological findings were prioritized in the follow-up and treatment strategies of CTS patients, clinical and patient-oriented assessment scales should be dealt together. Despite the electrophysiological findings, we believe that individual differences are effective in clinical and functional capacity. We conclude that since QDASH scale has a simple applicability in a short time, it can be used for assessing the symptom severity and disability of patients with CTS.

Key words

carpal tunnel syndrome, VAS, electrophysiology, QDASH

References (25)

  1. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Johnsson R, Ornstein E, Ranstam J, Rosén I. Prevalence of carpal tunnels syndrome in a general population. JAMA. 1999;282(2):153–158.
  2. Tanaka S, Wild DK, Seligman PJ, Behrens V, Cameron L, Putz-Anderson V. The US prevalence of self-reported carpal tunnel syndrome: 1988 National Health Interview Survey data. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(11):1846–1848.
  3. Zanette G, Marani S, Tamburin S. Extra-median spread of sensory symptoms in carpal tunnel syndrome suggests the presence of pain-related mechanisms. Pain. 2006;122(3):264–270.
  4. Zanette G, Marani S, Tamburin S. Proximal pain in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome: A clinical-neurophysiological study. J Peripher Nerv Syst. 2007;12(2):91–97.
  5. Zanette G, Cacciatori C, Tamburin S. Central sensitization in carpal tunnel syndrome with extraterritorial spread of sensory symptoms. Pain. 2010;148(2):227–236.
  6. Aroori S, Spence RA. Carpal tunnel syndrome. Ulster Med J. 2008;77(1): 6–17.
  7. Rempel D, Evanoff B, Amadio PC, et al. Consensus criteria for the classification of carpal tunnel syndrome in epidemiologic studies. Am J Public Health. 1998;88(10):1447–1451.
  8. Hudak P, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of thearm, shoulder and hand). The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–608.
  9. Duger T, Yakut E, Oksuz C, Yurukan S, Bilgutay BS, Ayhan C. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. Fizyoterapi Rehabilitasyon. 2006;17:99–103. [in Turkish]
  10. Koldas Dogan S, Ay S, Evcik D, Baser O. Adaptation of Turkish version of the questionnaire Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick DASH) in patients with carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2011;30(2):185–191.
  11. AAN, AAEM, AAPMR. Practice parameter for carpal tunnel syndrome (summary statement). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology. Neurology. 1993;43(11):2406–2409.
  12. Padua L, Lo Monaco M, Padua R, Gregori B, Tonali P. Neurophysiological classification of carpal tunnel syndrome: Assessment of 600 symptomatic hands. Ital J Neurol Sci. 1997;18(3):145–150.
  13. Padua L, Padua R, Lo Monaco M, Aprile I, Tonali P. Multiperspective assessment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A multicenter study. Italian CTS Study Group. Neurology. 1999;53(8):1654–1659.
  14. Leventoğlu A, Kuruoğlu R. Do electrophysiological findings differ according to the clinical severity of carpal tunnel syndrome? J Neurol Sci. 2006;23(4):9:272–278.
  15. Preston DC, Schapiro BE. Electromyography and neuromuscular disorders. Clinical-electrophysiologic correlations. 2nd ed. Pennsylvania: Elselvier Health Sciences; 2005.
  16. Ibrahim I, Khan WS, Goddard N, Smitham P. Carpal tunnel syndrome: A review of the recent literature. Open Orthop J. 2012;6:69–76.
  17. Itsubo T, Uchiyama S, Momose T, Yasutomi T, Imaeda T, Kato H. Electrophysiological responsiveness and quality of life (QuickDASH, CTSI) evaluation of surgically treated carpa tunnel syndrome. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(1):17–23.
  18. Chan L, Turner JA, Comstock BA, et al. The relationship between electrodiagnostic findings and patient symptoms and function in carpal tunnel syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(1):19–24.
  19. Longstaff L, Milner RH, O’Sullivan S, Fawcett P. Carpal tunnel syndrome: The correlation between outcome, symptoms and nerve conduction study findings. J Hand Surg Br. 2001;26(5):475–480.
  20. De Compos CC, Manzano GM, Leopoldino JF, et al. The relationship between symptoms and electrophysiological detected compression of the median nerve at the wrist. Acta Neurol Scand. 2004;110(6):398–402.
  21. Tamburin S, Cacciatori C, Praitano ML, et al. Median nerve small- and large-fiber damage in carpal tunnel syndrome: A quantitative sensory testing study. J Pain. 2011;12(2):205–212.
  22. Schmid AB, Bland JD, Bhat MA, Bennett DL. The relationship of nerve fiber pathology to sensory function in entrapment neuropathy. Brain. 2014;137(Pt 12):3186–3199.
  23. Truini A, Padua L, Biasiotta A, et al. Differential involvement of A-delta and A-beta fibres in neuropathic pain related to carpal tunnel syndrome. Pain. 2009;145(1–2):105–109.
  24. Imaeda T, Toh S, Wada T, et al. Impairment Evaluation Committee, Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand Version of the Quick Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (QuickDASH-JSSH) questionnaire. J Orthop Sci. 2006;11(3):248–253.
  25. Yücel H, Seyithanoğlu H. Choosing the most efficacious scoring method for carpal tunnel syndrome. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2015;49(1):23–29.
© Wroclaw Medical University